152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17919081)
1. To ignore or explore: top-down modulation of novelty processing.
Chong H; Riis JL; McGinnis SM; Williams DM; Holcomb PJ; Daffner KR
J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jan; 20(1):120-34. PubMed ID: 17919081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Frontal and parietal components of a cerebral network mediating voluntary attention to novel events.
Daffner KR; Scinto LF; Weitzman AM; Faust R; Rentz DM; Budson AE; Holcomb PJ
J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Feb; 15(2):294-313. PubMed ID: 12683359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Surprise? Early visual novelty processing is not modulated by attention.
Tarbi EC; Sun X; Holcomb PJ; Daffner KR
Psychophysiology; 2011 May; 48(5):624-32. PubMed ID: 20880260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of stimulus deviance on electrophysiologic and behavioral responses to novel events.
Daffner KR; Scinto LF; Calvo V; Faust R; Mesulam MM; West WC; Holcomb PJ
J Cogn Neurosci; 2000 May; 12(3):393-406. PubMed ID: 10931766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Age-related changes in early novelty processing as measured by ERPs.
Riis JL; Chong H; McGinnnis S; Tarbi E; Sun X; Holcomb PJ; Rentz DM; Daffner KR
Biol Psychol; 2009 Sep; 82(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 19463888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Attention capture by auditory significant stimuli: semantic analysis follows attention switching.
Escera C; Yago E; Corral MJ; Corbera S; Nuñez MI
Eur J Neurosci; 2003 Oct; 18(8):2408-12. PubMed ID: 14622204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The valence strength of negative stimuli modulates visual novelty processing: electrophysiological evidence from an event-related potential study.
Yuan JJ; Yang JM; Meng XX; Yu FQ; Li H
Neuroscience; 2008 Dec; 157(3):524-31. PubMed ID: 18926886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The central role of the prefrontal cortex in directing attention to novel events.
Daffner KR; Mesulam MM; Scinto LF; Acar D; Calvo V; Faust R; Chabrerie A; Kennedy B; Holcomb P
Brain; 2000 May; 123 ( Pt 5)():927-39. PubMed ID: 10775538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The time course of novelty processing in sensation seeking: an ERP study.
Zheng Y; Xu J; Jin Y; Sheng W; Ma Y; Zhang X; Shen H
Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 May; 76(2):57-63. PubMed ID: 20171999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An electrophysiological index of stimulus unfamiliarity.
Daffner KR; Mesulam MM; Scinto LF; Calvo V; Faust R; Holcomb PJ
Psychophysiology; 2000 Nov; 37(6):737-47. PubMed ID: 11117454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Age-related differences in attention to novelty among cognitively high performing adults.
Daffner KR; Ryan KK; Williams DM; Budson AE; Rentz DM; Wolk DA; Holcomb PJ
Biol Psychol; 2006 Apr; 72(1):67-77. PubMed ID: 16198046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What is novel in the novelty oddball paradigm? Functional significance of the novelty P3 event-related potential as revealed by independent component analysis.
Debener S; Makeig S; Delorme A; Engel AK
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Mar; 22(3):309-21. PubMed ID: 15722203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detecting novelty and significance.
Ferrari V; Bradley MM; Codispoti M; Lang PJ
J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Feb; 22(2):404-11. PubMed ID: 19400680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The enhanced processing of visual novel events in females: ERP correlates from two modified three-stimulus oddball tasks.
Yuan J; Xu S; Li C; Yang J; Li H; Yuan Y; Huang Y
Brain Res; 2012 Feb; 1437():77-88. PubMed ID: 22230670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Task switching and novelty processing activate a common neural network for cognitive control.
Barcelo F; Escera C; Corral MJ; Periáñez JA
J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Oct; 18(10):1734-48. PubMed ID: 17014377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Auditory novelty oddball allows reliable distinction of top-down and bottom-up processes of attention.
Debener S; Kranczioch C; Herrmann CS; Engel AK
Int J Psychophysiol; 2002 Oct; 46(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 12374648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pathophysiology underlying diminished attention to novel events in patients with early AD.
Daffner KR; Rentz DM; Scinto LF; Faust R; Budson AE; Holcomb PJ
Neurology; 2001 May; 56(10):1377-83. PubMed ID: 11376191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Negative emotional context enhances auditory novelty processing.
Domínguez-Borràs J; Garcia-Garcia M; Escera C
Neuroreport; 2008 Mar; 19(4):503-7. PubMed ID: 18287956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stimulus novelty and cognitive-related ERP components of the infant brain.
Ackles PK
Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Feb; 106(1):3-20. PubMed ID: 18459351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Expecting the unexpected: the effects of deviance on novelty processing.
Schomaker J; Roos R; Meeter M
Behav Neurosci; 2014 Apr; 128(2):146-60. PubMed ID: 24773435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
