These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17919445)

  • 1. Reproducibility of visual field end point criteria for standard automated perimetry, full-threshold, and Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm strategies: diagnostic innovations in glaucoma study.
    Bourne RR; Jahanbakhsh K; Boden C; Zangwill LM; Hoffmann EM; Medeiros FA; Weinreb RN; Sample PA
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Dec; 144(6):908-913. PubMed ID: 17919445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing the full-threshold and Swedish interactive thresholding algorithms for short-wavelength automated perimetry.
    Ng M; Racette L; Pascual JP; Liebmann JM; Girkin CA; Lovell SL; Zangwill LM; Weinreb RN; Sample PA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Apr; 50(4):1726-33. PubMed ID: 19074800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relationship of SITA and full-threshold standard perimetry to frequency-doubling technology perimetry in glaucoma.
    Boden C; Pascual J; Medeiros FA; Aihara M; Weinreb RN; Sample PA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2433-9. PubMed ID: 15980232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detecting visual function abnormalities using the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm and matrix perimetry in eyes with glaucomatous appearance of the optic disc.
    Sakata LM; Deleon-Ortega J; Arthur SN; Monheit BE; Girkin CA
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2007 Mar; 125(3):340-5. PubMed ID: 17353404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. SITA standard in optic neuropathies and hemianopias: a comparison with full threshold testing.
    Wall M; Punke SG; Stickney TL; Brito CF; Withrow KR; Kardon RH
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Feb; 42(2):528-37. PubMed ID: 11157893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of visual field defects using matrix perimetry and standard achromatic perimetry.
    Patel A; Wollstein G; Ishikawa H; Schuman JS
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Mar; 114(3):480-7. PubMed ID: 17123623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of threshold estimation and learning effect of two perimetric strategies, SITA Fast and CLIP, in damaged visual fields.
    Capris P; Autuori S; Capris E; Papadia M
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2008; 18(2):182-90. PubMed ID: 18320509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients.
    Bozkurt B; Yilmaz PT; Irkec M
    J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the new perimetric GATE strategy with conventional full-threshold and SITA standard strategies.
    Schiefer U; Pascual JP; Edmunds B; Feudner E; Hoffmann EM; Johnson CA; Lagrèze WA; Pfeiffer N; Sample PA; Staubach F; Weleber RG; Vonthein R; Krapp E; Paetzold J
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Jan; 50(1):488-94. PubMed ID: 19060285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of glaucomatous visual field defects using standard full threshold and Swedish interactive threshold algorithms.
    Budenz DL; Rhee P; Feuer WJ; McSoley J; Johnson CA; Anderson DR
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2002 Sep; 120(9):1136-41. PubMed ID: 12215086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.
    Leeprechanon N; Giangiacomo A; Fontana H; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of false positives with the Humphrey Field Analyzer II perimeter with the SITA Algorithm.
    Newkirk MR; Gardiner SK; Demirel S; Johnson CA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Oct; 47(10):4632-7. PubMed ID: 17003461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
    Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic sensitivity of fast blue-yellow and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma: a comparison between different test programs.
    Bengtsson B; Heijl A
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Jul; 113(7):1092-7. PubMed ID: 16815399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm for central visual field defects unrelated to nerve fiber layer.
    Hirasawa K; Shoji N
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016 May; 254(5):845-54. PubMed ID: 26279004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sensitivity of Swedish interactive threshold algorithm compared with standard full threshold algorithm in Humphrey visual field testing.
    Sekhar GC; Naduvilath TJ; Lakkai M; Jayakumar AJ; Pandi GT; Mandal AK; Honavar SG
    Ophthalmology; 2000 Jul; 107(7):1303-8. PubMed ID: 10889102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Full-threshold versus Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm (SITA) in normal individuals undergoing automated perimetry for the first time.
    Schimiti RB; Avelino RR; Kara-José N; Costa VP
    Ophthalmology; 2002 Nov; 109(11):2084-92; discussion 2092. PubMed ID: 12414419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantification and Predictors of Visual Field Variability in Healthy, Glaucoma Suspect, and Glaucomatous Eyes Using SITA-Faster.
    Tan JCK; Agar A; Kalloniatis M; Phu J
    Ophthalmology; 2024 Jun; 131(6):658-666. PubMed ID: 38110124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of false-negative responses for full threshold and SITA standard perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal observers.
    Johnson CA; Sherman K; Doyle C; Wall M
    J Glaucoma; 2014; 23(5):288-92. PubMed ID: 23632399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the Humphrey swedish interactive thresholding algorithm (SITA) and full threshold strategies.
    Sharma AK; Goldberg I; Graham SL; Mohsin M
    J Glaucoma; 2000 Feb; 9(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 10708227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.