These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17919515)

  • 1. Factors associated with incomplete colonoscopy: further information from a large prospective Italian survey.
    Radaelli F; Minoli G
    Gastroenterology; 2007 Oct; 133(4):1390-1; author reply 1392. PubMed ID: 17919515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Technical performance of colonoscopy: the key role of sedation/analgesia and other quality indicators.
    Radaelli F; Meucci G; Sgroi G; Minoli G;
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 May; 103(5):1122-30. PubMed ID: 18445096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors associated with incomplete colonoscopy: a population-based study.
    Shah HA; Paszat LF; Saskin R; Stukel TA; Rabeneck L
    Gastroenterology; 2007 Jun; 132(7):2297-303. PubMed ID: 17570204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing the extent of colonoscopy.
    Taylor KM; Harris AW
    Gastroenterology; 2007 Oct; 133(4):1391-2; author reply 1392. PubMed ID: 17919517
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variation of quality of colonoscopy in Italy over five years: a nation-wide observational study.
    Radaelli F; Paggi S; Minoli G
    Dig Liver Dis; 2013 Jan; 45(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 22921044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Home repair and colonoscopy: quality counts.
    Lieberman D
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2006 Oct; 64(4):563-4. PubMed ID: 16996350
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Colonoscopy practice in Italy: a prospective survey on behalf of the Italian Association of Hospital Gastroenterologists.
    Radaelli F; Meucci G; Minoli G;
    Dig Liver Dis; 2008 Nov; 40(11):897-904. PubMed ID: 18395500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Are colonoscopies performed in private offices less likely to be successful?
    Rubin RA; Galambos MR
    Gastroenterology; 2007 Oct; 133(4):1390; author reply 1392. PubMed ID: 17919516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Quality indicators in colonoscopy].
    Lachter J; Ben Hur D
    Harefuah; 2011 Jun; 150(6):507-11, 553, 552. PubMed ID: 21800487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality evaluation of colonoscopy reporting and colonoscopy performance in daily clinical practice.
    de Jonge V; Sint Nicolaas J; Cahen DL; Moolenaar W; Ouwendijk RJ; Tang TJ; van Tilburg AJ; Kuipers EJ; van Leerdam ME;
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):98-106. PubMed ID: 21907986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness of a continuous quality improvement program on colonoscopy practice.
    Imperiali G; Minoli G; Meucci GM; Spinzi G; Strocchi E; Terruzzi V; Radaelli F
    Endoscopy; 2007 Apr; 39(4):314-8. PubMed ID: 17273959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A prospective study of factors that determine cecal intubation time at colonoscopy.
    Zuber-Jerger I; Kullmann F
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2006 Feb; 63(2):358-9. PubMed ID: 16427963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Colonoscopy: a tarnished gold standard?
    Cooper GS
    Gastroenterology; 2007 Jun; 132(7):2588-90. PubMed ID: 17570228
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new composite measure of colonoscopy: the Performance Indicator of Colonic Intubation (PICI).
    Valori RM; Damery S; Gavin DR; Anderson JT; Donnelly MT; Williams JG; Swarbrick ET
    Endoscopy; 2018 Jan; 50(1):40-51. PubMed ID: 28753700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality in colonoscopy reporting: an assessment of compliance and performance improvement.
    Coe SG; Panjala C; Heckman MG; Patel M; Qumseya BJ; Wang YR; Dalton B; Tran P; Palmer W; Diehl N; Wallace MB; Raimondo M
    Dig Liver Dis; 2012 Aug; 44(8):660-4. PubMed ID: 22579446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality in colonoscopy: cecal intubation first, then what?
    Rex DK
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2006 Apr; 101(4):732-4. PubMed ID: 16635220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Colonoscopy performance in a large private practice: a comparison to quality benchmarks.
    Morelli MS; Miller JS; Imperiale TF
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2010 Feb; 44(2):152-3. PubMed ID: 19770678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Variable detection of nonadenomatous polyps by individual endoscopists at colonoscopy and correlation with adenoma detection.
    Chen SC; Rex DK
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2008 Jul; 42(6):704-7. PubMed ID: 18496392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality assurance for screening colonoscopies.
    Birkner B
    Z Gastroenterol; 2008 Apr; 46 Suppl 1():S43-4. PubMed ID: 18368643
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rates of complete colonic evaluation after incomplete colonoscopy and their associated factors: a population-based study.
    Rizek R; Paszat LF; Stukel TA; Saskin R; Li C; Rabeneck L
    Med Care; 2009 Jan; 47(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 19106730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.