These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17919516)

  • 1. Are colonoscopies performed in private offices less likely to be successful?
    Rubin RA; Galambos MR
    Gastroenterology; 2007 Oct; 133(4):1390; author reply 1392. PubMed ID: 17919516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing the extent of colonoscopy.
    Taylor KM; Harris AW
    Gastroenterology; 2007 Oct; 133(4):1391-2; author reply 1392. PubMed ID: 17919517
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Colonoscopy: a tarnished gold standard?
    Cooper GS
    Gastroenterology; 2007 Jun; 132(7):2588-90. PubMed ID: 17570228
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factors associated with incomplete colonoscopy: a population-based study.
    Shah HA; Paszat LF; Saskin R; Stukel TA; Rabeneck L
    Gastroenterology; 2007 Jun; 132(7):2297-303. PubMed ID: 17570204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality and safety issues in procedural rural practice: a prospective evaluation of current quality and safety guidelines in 3000 colonoscopies.
    Azzopardi J; DeWitt DE
    Rural Remote Health; 2012; 12():1949. PubMed ID: 22985075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality in colonoscopy: cecal intubation first, then what?
    Rex DK
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2006 Apr; 101(4):732-4. PubMed ID: 16635220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors associated with incomplete colonoscopy: further information from a large prospective Italian survey.
    Radaelli F; Minoli G
    Gastroenterology; 2007 Oct; 133(4):1390-1; author reply 1392. PubMed ID: 17919515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Colonoscopy: Not quite the gold standard.
    Harewood GC
    Dig Liver Dis; 2007 Jul; 39(7):690-1. PubMed ID: 17531552
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Technical performance of colonoscopy: the key role of sedation/analgesia and other quality indicators.
    Radaelli F; Meucci G; Sgroi G; Minoli G;
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 May; 103(5):1122-30. PubMed ID: 18445096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Single-center Review of Pediatric Colonoscopy Quality Indicators.
    Pasquarella CS; Kaplan B; Mahajan L; Lamparyk K; Kay M
    J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2019 May; 68(5):648-654. PubMed ID: 30562311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What are the sensitivity and specificity of endoscopic photographs in determining completion of colonoscopy? Results from an online questionnaire.
    Thuraisingam AI; Brown JL; Anderson JT
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Jun; 20(6):567-71. PubMed ID: 18467917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Variation of quality of colonoscopy in Italy over five years: a nation-wide observational study.
    Radaelli F; Paggi S; Minoli G
    Dig Liver Dis; 2013 Jan; 45(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 22921044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Monitoring photographic proof of cecal intubation: A closed-loop audit of best practice colonoscopy.
    Whitehead-Clarke T; Sothinathan R; Sandhya MA; Sharma D; Raja MA
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2021 Feb; 40(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 33219988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect and Tolerability of Same-Day Repeat Colonoscopy.
    Akgul G; Ozgur Yeniova A; Ozsoy Z; Yenidogan E; Kefeli A; Dasıran MF; Daldal E; Akbas A; Okan İ
    J Invest Surg; 2020 Jun; 33(5):459-465. PubMed ID: 30380338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Introduction of a quality index in a Hungarian endoscopy unit].
    Gyökeres T; Rusznyák K; Visnyei Z; Schäfer E; Szamosi T; Banai J
    Orv Hetil; 2012 Jul; 153(29):1142-52. PubMed ID: 22805040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adenoma detection rate: the real indicator of quality in colonoscopy.
    Millan MS; Gross P; Manilich E; Church JM
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2008 Aug; 51(8):1217-20. PubMed ID: 18500502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application of ANAES guidelines for colonoscopy in France: a practical survey.
    Huppertz J; Coriat R; Leblanc S; Gaudric M; Brezault C; Grandjouan S; Chaput U; Prat F; Chaussade S
    Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2010 Oct; 34(10):541-8. PubMed ID: 20739131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality assurance for screening colonoscopies.
    Birkner B
    Z Gastroenterol; 2008 Apr; 46 Suppl 1():S43-4. PubMed ID: 18368643
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of exclusion criteria on a physician's adenoma detection rate.
    Marcondes FO; Dean KM; Schoen RE; Leffler DA; Rose S; Morris M; Mehrotra A
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Oct; 82(4):668-75. PubMed ID: 26385275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efficacy and effectiveness of colonoscopy: how do we bridge the gap?
    Hewett DG; Kahi CJ; Rex DK
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2010 Oct; 20(4):673-84. PubMed ID: 20889071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.