These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17919925)

  • 1. Power calculation for group fMRI studies accounting for arbitrary design and temporal autocorrelation.
    Mumford JA; Nichols TE
    Neuroimage; 2008 Jan; 39(1):261-8. PubMed ID: 17919925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Power and sample size calculation for neuroimaging studies by non-central random field theory.
    Hayasaka S; Peiffer AM; Hugenschmidt CE; Laurienti PJ
    Neuroimage; 2007 Sep; 37(3):721-30. PubMed ID: 17658273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Simple group fMRI modeling and inference.
    Mumford JA; Nichols T
    Neuroimage; 2009 Oct; 47(4):1469-75. PubMed ID: 19463958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Increasing the effect size in event-related fMRI studies.
    McKeown MJ; Wang ZJ; Abugharbieh R; Handy TC
    IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2006; 25(2):91-101. PubMed ID: 16568941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Making the most of fMRI at 7 T by suppressing spontaneous signal fluctuations.
    Bianciardi M; van Gelderen P; Duyn JH; Fukunaga M; de Zwart JA
    Neuroimage; 2009 Jan; 44(2):448-54. PubMed ID: 18835582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Joint spatial denoising and active region of interest delineation in functional magnetic resonance imaging.
    Ng B; Abugharbieh R; Palmer SJ; McKeown MJ
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():3404-7. PubMed ID: 18002728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analyzing the connectivity between regions of interest: an approach based on cluster Granger causality for fMRI data analysis.
    Sato JR; Fujita A; Cardoso EF; Thomaz CE; Brammer MJ; Amaro E
    Neuroimage; 2010 Oct; 52(4):1444-55. PubMed ID: 20472076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimizing the imaging of the monkey auditory cortex: sparse vs. continuous fMRI.
    Petkov CI; Kayser C; Augath M; Logothetis NK
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Oct; 27(8):1065-73. PubMed ID: 19269764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Bayesian hierarchical framework for spatial modeling of fMRI data.
    DuBois Bowman F; Caffo B; Bassett SS; Kilts C
    Neuroimage; 2008 Jan; 39(1):146-56. PubMed ID: 17936016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anatomically informed bayesian model selection for fMRI group data analysis.
    Keller M; Lavielle M; Perrot M; Roche A
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2009; 12(Pt 2):450-7. PubMed ID: 20426143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison between shifted Spearman rank correlation test and SPM in fMRI.
    Dewalle AS; Betrouni N; Steinling M; Vermandel M; Rousseau J; Vasseur C
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():3400-3. PubMed ID: 18002727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Activation detection in functional MRI using model-free technique based on CCA-ICA analysis.
    El-Shabrawy N; Mohamed AS; Youssef AB; Kadah YM
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():3430-3. PubMed ID: 18002734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Parametric response surface models for analysis of multi-site fMRI data.
    Kim S; Smyth P; Stern H; Turner J
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2005; 8(Pt 1):352-9. PubMed ID: 16685865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Model-independent method for fMRI analysis.
    Soltanian-Zadeh H; Peck DJ; Hearshen DO; Lajiness-O'Neill RR
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Mar; 23(3):285-96. PubMed ID: 15027521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Revisiting multi-subject random effects in fMRI: advocating prevalence estimation.
    Rosenblatt JD; Vink M; Benjamini Y
    Neuroimage; 2014 Jan; 84():113-21. PubMed ID: 23988271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Discovering structure in the space of activation profiles in fMRI.
    Lashkari D; Vul E; Kanwisher N; Golland P
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2008; 11(Pt 1):1016-24. PubMed ID: 18979845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. From spatial regularization to anatomical priors in fMRI analysis.
    Ou W; Golland P
    Inf Process Med Imaging; 2005; 19():88-100. PubMed ID: 17354687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Incorporating spatial dependence into Bayesian multiple testing of statistical parametric maps in functional neuroimaging.
    Brown DA; Lazar NA; Datta GS; Jang W; McDowell JE
    Neuroimage; 2014 Jan; 84():97-112. PubMed ID: 23981437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hemodynamic-informed parcellation of fMRI data in a joint detection estimation framework.
    Chaari L; Forbes F; Vincent T; Ciuciu P
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2012; 15(Pt 3):180-8. PubMed ID: 23286129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of temporal resolution and serial autocorrelations in event-related functional MRI.
    Sahib AK; Mathiak K; Erb M; Elshahabi A; Klamer S; Scheffler K; Focke NK; Ethofer T
    Magn Reson Med; 2016 Dec; 76(6):1805-1813. PubMed ID: 26749161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.