BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

446 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17919934)

  • 1. The self in conflict: the role of executive processes during truthful and deceptive responses about attitudes.
    Johnson R; Henkell H; Simon E; Zhu J
    Neuroimage; 2008 Jan; 39(1):469-82. PubMed ID: 17919934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differential effects of practice on the executive processes used for truthful and deceptive responses: an event-related brain potential study.
    Johnson R; Barnhardt J; Zhu J
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):386-404. PubMed ID: 16099352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The contribution of executive processes to deceptive responding.
    Johnson R; Barnhardt J; Zhu J
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(7):878-901. PubMed ID: 14998703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An event-related potential study of deception to self preferences.
    Tu S; Li H; Jou J; Zhang Q; Wang T; Yu C; Qiu J
    Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 1247():142-8. PubMed ID: 18952072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Brain activity during simulated deception: an event-related functional magnetic resonance study.
    Langleben DD; Schroeder L; Maldjian JA; Gur RC; McDonald S; Ragland JD; O'Brien CP; Childress AR
    Neuroimage; 2002 Mar; 15(3):727-32. PubMed ID: 11848716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attempting to hide our real thoughts: electrophysiological evidence from truthful and deceptive responses during evaluation.
    Dong G; Wu H
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Jul; 479(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 20470861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lie-specific involvement of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in deception.
    Priori A; Mameli F; Cogiamanian F; Marceglia S; Tiriticco M; Mrakic-Sposta S; Ferrucci R; Zago S; Polezzi D; Sartori G
    Cereb Cortex; 2008 Feb; 18(2):451-5. PubMed ID: 17584853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A truth that's told with bad intent: an ERP study of deception.
    CarriĆ³n RE; Keenan JP; Sebanz N
    Cognition; 2010 Jan; 114(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 19836013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Deceiving others: distinct neural responses of the prefrontal cortex and amygdala in simple fabrication and deception with social interactions.
    Abe N; Suzuki M; Mori E; Itoh M; Fujii T
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Feb; 19(2):287-95. PubMed ID: 17280517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The processes leading to deception: ERP spatiotemporal principal component analysis and source analysis.
    Sun SY; Mai X; Liu C; Liu JY; Luo YJ
    Soc Neurosci; 2011; 6(4):348-59. PubMed ID: 21225491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does willingness affect the N2-P3 effect of deceptive and honest responses?
    Wu H; Hu X; Fu G
    Neurosci Lett; 2009 Dec; 467(2):63-6. PubMed ID: 19818837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characteristics of alpha power event-related desynchronization in the discrimination of spontaneous deceptive responses.
    Kim S; Jung KH; Lee JH
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Aug; 85(2):230-5. PubMed ID: 22554580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Single-trial discrimination of truthful from deceptive responses during a game of financial risk using alpha-band MEG signals.
    Seth AK; Iversen JR; Edelman GM
    Neuroimage; 2006 Aug; 32(1):465-76. PubMed ID: 16678444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Thirty-site P300 scalp distribution, amplitude variance across sites, and amplitude in detection of deceptive concealment of multiple guilty items.
    Lui MA; Rosenfeld JP; Ryan AH
    Soc Neurosci; 2009; 4(6):491-509. PubMed ID: 18633836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attitudes to the right- and left: frontal ERP asymmetries associated with stimulus valence and processing goals.
    Cunningham WA; Espinet SD; DeYoung CG; Zelazo PD
    Neuroimage; 2005 Dec; 28(4):827-34. PubMed ID: 16039143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying deceptive hazard evaluation: An event-related potentials investigation.
    Fu H; Qiu W; Ma H; Ma Q
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0182892. PubMed ID: 28793344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lying in the scanner: covert countermeasures disrupt deception detection by functional magnetic resonance imaging.
    Ganis G; Rosenfeld JP; Meixner J; Kievit RA; Schendan HE
    Neuroimage; 2011 Mar; 55(1):312-9. PubMed ID: 21111834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The deceptive response: effects of response conflict and strategic monitoring on the late positive component and episodic memory-related brain activity.
    Johnson R; Barnhardt J; Zhu J
    Biol Psychol; 2003 Nov; 64(3):217-53. PubMed ID: 14630405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A replication study of the neural correlates of deception.
    Kozel FA; Padgett TM; George MS
    Behav Neurosci; 2004 Aug; 118(4):852-6. PubMed ID: 15301611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Study of brain mechanisms in error detection during deceptive responses in the normal state and under the influence of alcohol].
    Kireev MV; Pakhomov SV; Medvedev SV
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 2008; 34(2):13-22. PubMed ID: 18472568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.