BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17920500)

  • 1. Photographic soft-tissue profile analysis in children at 6 years of age.
    Dimaggio FR; Ciusa V; Sforza C; Ferrario VF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):475-80. PubMed ID: 17920500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of the soft tissue facial profile by means of angular measurements.
    Anić-Milosević S; Lapter-Varga M; Slaj M
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 18263886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of soft tissue facial morphometry in children with Class I and Class II occlusions.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Serrao G; Puletto S; Bignotto M; Tartaglia G
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(3):187-94. PubMed ID: 7814923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Turkish adults.
    Malkoç S; Demir A; Uysal T; Canbuldu N
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 19064675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Angles of facial convexity in different skeletal Classes.
    Godt A; Müller A; Kalwitzki M; Göz G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):648-53. PubMed ID: 17878186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two-dimensional vs three-dimensional assessment of soft tissue facial profile: a non invasive study in 6-year-old healthy children.
    Sforza C; Dimaggio FR; Dellavia C; Grandi G; Ferrario VF
    Minerva Stomatol; 2007 May; 56(5):253-65. PubMed ID: 17529913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Facial soft tissue changes after orthodontic treatment.
    Aksakalli S; Demir A
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2014; 17(3):282-6. PubMed ID: 24714003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients.
    Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Morphometric analysis of facial profile in adults.
    Krey KF; Dannhauer KH
    J Orofac Orthop; 2008 Nov; 69(6):424-36. PubMed ID: 19169639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Anatolian Turkish adults.
    Kale-Varlk S
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Nov; 19(6):1481-6. PubMed ID: 19098536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Soft tissue facial angles in Down's syndrome subjects: a three-dimensional non-invasive study.
    Ferrario VF; Dellavia C; Serrao G; Sforza C
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):355-62. PubMed ID: 16043473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Soft tissue facial morphology related to headform: a three-dimensional quantitative analysis in childhood.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Poggio CE; Schmitz JH; Colombo A
    J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol; 1997; 17(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 9224943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Condylar and ramal vertical asymmetry in unilateral and bilateral posterior crossbite patients and a normal occlusion sample.
    Uysal T; Sisman Y; Kurt G; Ramoglu SI
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 19577146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the effects of Twin Block and activator treatment on the soft tissue profile.
    Varlik SK; Gültan A; Tümer N
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 18281262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validity and reliability of facial profile evaluation in vertical and horizontal dimensions from lateral cephalograms and lateral photographs.
    Michiels G; Sather AH
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 8006483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of providers' and consumers' perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness.
    Maple JR; Vig KW; Beck FM; Larsen PE; Shanker S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):690-6; quiz 801. PubMed ID: 16360907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Class II subdivision malocclusion types and evaluation of their asymmetries.
    Janson G; de Lima KJ; Woodside DG; Metaxas A; de Freitas MR; Henriques JF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan; 131(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 17208107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The relationship between facial 3-D morphometry and the perception of attractiveness in children.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Poggio CE; Colombo A; Tartaglia G
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1997; 12(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 9511485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of facial attractiveness from end-of-treatment facial photographs.
    Shafiee R; Korn EL; Pearson H; Boyd RL; Baumrind S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):500-8. PubMed ID: 18405813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Elliptic Fourier analysis of facial profiles during growth and development.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Dellavia C; Ciusa V; Serrao G
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2002; 17(4):348-54. PubMed ID: 12596695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.