These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17920500)

  • 61. Dental and alveolar arch asymmetries in normal occlusion and Class II Division 1 and Class II subdivision malocclusions.
    Uysal T; Kurt G; Ramoglu SI
    World J Orthod; 2009; 10(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 19388427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Soft tissue facial angles in individuals with ectodermal dysplasia: A three-dimensional noninvasive study.
    Sforza C; Dellavia C; Goffredi M; Ferrario VF
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2006 May; 43(3):339-49. PubMed ID: 16681407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Configuration of facial features influences subjective evaluation of facial type.
    Karavaka SM; Halazonetis DJ; Spyropoulos MN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):277-82. PubMed ID: 18249295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. The perception of facial aesthetics in a young Spanish population.
    Macías Gago AB; Romero Maroto M; Crego A
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 34(3):335-9. PubMed ID: 21447783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Relationship between dental arch width and vertical facial morphology in untreated adults.
    Forster CM; Sunga E; Chung CH
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Jun; 30(3):288-94. PubMed ID: 18263889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Assessment of orthodontic treatment need: a comparison of study models and facial photographs.
    Sherlock JM; Cobourne MT; McDonald F
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 36(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 18205636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. [Sex differences of segments and angles of the facial profile, as studied by discriminant analysis].
    Terk B; Fenart R
    Orthod Fr; 1992; 63 Pt 2():613-7. PubMed ID: 1341754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Ranking facial attractiveness.
    Knight H; Keith O
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):340-8. PubMed ID: 16043472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. An Asian community's perspective on facial profile attractiveness.
    Soh J; Chew MT; Wong HB
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 35(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 17244134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Soft tissue facial profile of normal dental and skeletal subjects in Croatian population aged 12 to 15 years.
    Lapter Varga M; Anić Milosević S; Vusić A; Slaj M; Varga S; Perinić M; Slaj M
    Coll Antropol; 2008 Jun; 32(2):523-8. PubMed ID: 18756905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. The effect of increasing occlusal vertical dimension on face height.
    Gross MD; Nissan J; Ormianer Z; Dvori S; Shifman A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(4):353-7. PubMed ID: 12170849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Dentofacial characteristics of growing patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a morphological study.
    Morel-Verdebout C; Botteron S; Kiliaridis S
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Oct; 29(5):500-7. PubMed ID: 17974540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. A morphological study of the relationship between arch dimensions and craniofacial structures in adolescents with Class II Division 1 malocclusions and various facial types.
    Kageyama T; Domínguez-Rodríguez GC; Vigorito JW; Deguchi T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Mar; 129(3):368-75. PubMed ID: 16527632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Harmonized profiloplasty using balanced angular profile analysis.
    Park HS; Rhee SC; Kang SR; Lee JH
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2004; 28(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 15156291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Cephalometric norms for the Saudi children living in the western region of Saudi Arabia: a research report.
    Hassan AH
    Head Face Med; 2005 Aug; 1():5. PubMed ID: 16270926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Lateral cephalometric norms for adolescent Kuwaitis: soft tissue measurements.
    Al-Azemi R; Al-Jame B; Artun J
    Med Princ Pract; 2008; 17(3):215-20. PubMed ID: 18408390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. The relationship between craniofacial structures and the nose in Anatolian Turkish adults: a cephalometric evaluation.
    Gulsen A; Okay C; Aslan BI; Uner O; Yavuzer R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Aug; 130(2):131.e15-25. PubMed ID: 16905054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Three-dimensional facial morphometry of attractive children and normal children in the deciduous and early mixed dentition.
    Sforza C; Laino A; D'Alessio R; Dellavia C; Grandi G; Ferrario VF
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Nov; 77(6):1025-33. PubMed ID: 18004919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Divine proportions in the growing face.
    Ferring V; Pancherz H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Oct; 134(4):472-9. PubMed ID: 18929263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Correlations between cephalometric and photographic measurements of facial attractiveness in Chinese and US patients after orthodontic treatment.
    Oh HS; Korn EL; Zhang X; Liu Y; Xu T; Boyd R; Baumrind S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):762.e1-14; discussion 762-3. PubMed ID: 19962590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.