375 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17920503)
1. A long-term follow-up study of Class II malocclusion correction after treatment with Class II elastics or fixed functional appliances.
Nelson B; Hägg U; Hansen K; Bendeus M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):499-503. PubMed ID: 17920503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Class II correction in patients treated with class II elastics and with fixed functional appliances: a comparative study.
Nelson B; Hansen K; Hägg U
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 10935954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term comparison of treatment outcome and stability of Class II patients treated with functional appliances versus bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Berger JL; Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; George C; Kaczynski R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):451-64; quiz 516-7. PubMed ID: 15821690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term effects of Class III treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy followed by fixed appliances.
Westwood PV; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Sarver DM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):306-20. PubMed ID: 12637903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Herbst treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions in retrognathic and prognathic facial types.
Bock N; Pancherz H
Angle Orthod; 2006 Nov; 76(6):930-41. PubMed ID: 17090166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the headgear activator and Herbst appliance--effects and post-treatment changes.
Phan KL; Bendeus M; Hägg U; Hansen K; Rabie AB
Eur J Orthod; 2006 Dec; 28(6):594-604. PubMed ID: 17142260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term stability of skeletal Class III patients treated with splints, Class III elastics, and chincup.
Ferro A; Nucci LP; Ferro F; Gallo C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Apr; 123(4):423-34. PubMed ID: 12695770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion in adults: stepwise vs single-step advancement with the Herbst appliance.
Purkayastha SK; Rabie AB; Wong R
World J Orthod; 2008; 9(3):233-43. PubMed ID: 18834006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of changes in the vertical facial dimension with different anchorage systems in extraction and non-extraction subjects treated by Begg fixed appliances: a retrospective study.
Alkumru P; Erdem D; Altug-Atac AT
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Oct; 29(5):508-16. PubMed ID: 17974541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The integrated Herbst appliance--treatment effects in a group of adolescent males with Class II malocclusions compared with growth changes in an untreated control group.
Hägglund P; Segerdal S; Forsberg CM
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):120-7. PubMed ID: 18216374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Timing of Class II treatment: skeletal changes comparing 1-phase and 2-phase treatment.
Dolce C; McGorray SP; Brazeau L; King GJ; Wheeler TT
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 17920501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Treatment timing for Twin-block therapy.
Baccetti T; Franchi L; Toth LR; McNamara JA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 10935956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An evaluation of maxillary and mandibular rotational responses with the Clark twin block appliance.
Lau EY; Sampson WJ; Townsend GC; Hughes T
Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 19634464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
de Oliveira JN; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Rodrigues de Almeida M; de Oliveira JN
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17628251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Orthodontic treatment changes of chin position in Class II Division 1 patients.
LaHaye MB; Buschang PH; Alexander RG; Boley JC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Dec; 130(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 17169735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Facial aesthetics and the divine proportion: a comparison of surgical and non-surgical class II treatment.
Shell TL; Woods MG
Aust Orthod J; 2004 Nov; 20(2):51-63. PubMed ID: 16429875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cephalometric evaluation of Class II malocclusion treatment with cervical headgear and mandibular fixed appliances.
Freitas MR; Lima DV; Freitas KM; Janson G; Henriques JF
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Oct; 30(5):477-82. PubMed ID: 18725383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Initial and late treatment effects of headgear-Herbst appliance with mandibular step-by-step advancement.
Hägg U; Du X; Rabie AB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):477-85. PubMed ID: 12439475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Short-term skeletal and dental effects of the Xbow appliance as measured on lateral cephalograms.
Flores-Mir C; Barnett G; Higgins DW; Heo G; Major PW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):822-32. PubMed ID: 19962605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of soft-tissue profiles after treatment with headgear or Herbst appliance.
Sloss EA; Southard KA; Qian F; Stock SE; Mann KR; Meyer DL; Southard TE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):509-14. PubMed ID: 18405814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
