149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17920599)
1. A comparison of liquid-based cytology with conventional cytology.
Celik C; Gezginç K; Toy H; Findik S; Yilmaz O
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2008 Feb; 100(2):163-6. PubMed ID: 17920599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Increased detection of epithelial cell abnormalities by liquid-based gynecologic cytology preparations. A review of accumulated data.
Austin RM; Ramzy I
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):178-84. PubMed ID: 9479337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cervical cancer screening with liquid cytology in women with developmental disabilities.
Kavoussi SK; Smith YR; Ernst SD; Quint EH
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2009; 18(1):115-8. PubMed ID: 19072727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Direct comparison of liquid-based and conventional cytology in a South African screening trial.
Taylor S; Kuhn L; Dupree W; Denny L; De Souza M; Wright TC
Int J Cancer; 2006 Feb; 118(4):957-62. PubMed ID: 16152600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. CytoRich liquid-based cervical cytologic test. Screening results in a routine cytopathology service.
Vassilakos P; Griffin S; Megevand E; Campana A
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):198-202. PubMed ID: 9479340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multicenter masked evaluation of AutoCyte PREP thin layers with matched conventional smears. Including initial biopsy results.
Bishop JW; Bigner SH; Colgan TJ; Husain M; Howell LP; McIntosh KM; Taylor DA; Sadeghi MH
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):189-97. PubMed ID: 9479339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Health technology assessment report. Use of liquid-based cytology for cervical cancer precursors screening].
Ronco G; Confortini M; Maccallini V; Naldoni C; Segnan N; Sideri M; Zappa M; Zorzi M; Calvia M; Giorgi Rossi P
Epidemiol Prev; 2012; 36(5 Suppl 2):e1-e33. PubMed ID: 23139163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Liquid-based cytology and conventional cervical smears: a comparison study in an Asian screening population.
Cheung AN; Szeto EF; Leung BS; Khoo US; Ng AW
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 99(6):331-5. PubMed ID: 14681939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Liquid-based cytology: evaluation of effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and application to present practice.
Cox JT
J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2004 Nov; 2(6):597-611. PubMed ID: 19780303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Critical Analyses of the Introduction of Liquid-Based Cytology in a Public Health Service of the State of São Paulo, Brazil.
Longatto-Filho A; Levi JE; Martins TR; Cohen D; Cury L; Villa LL; Eluf-Neto J
Acta Cytol; 2015; 59(3):273-7. PubMed ID: 26279162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Human papillomavirus testing and liquid-based cytology: results at recruitment from the new technologies for cervical cancer randomized controlled trial.
Ronco G; Segnan N; Giorgi-Rossi P; Zappa M; Casadei GP; Carozzi F; Dalla Palma P; Del Mistro A; Folicaldi S; Gillio-Tos A; Nardo G; Naldoni C; Schincaglia P; Zorzi M; Confortini M; Cuzick J;
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Jun; 98(11):765-74. PubMed ID: 16757701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Human papillomavirus testing versus repeat cytology for triage of minor cytological cervical lesions.
Arbyn M; Roelens J; Simoens C; Buntinx F; Paraskevaidis E; Martin-Hirsch PP; Prendiville WJ
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Mar; 2013(3):CD008054. PubMed ID: 23543559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of liquid-based and conventional cytology using data for cervical cancer screening from the Japan Cancer Society.
Ito K; Kimura R; Konishi H; Ozawa N; Yaegashi N; Ohashi Y; Suzuki M; Kakizoe T
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2020 Feb; 50(2):138-144. PubMed ID: 31735963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Unsatisfactory Rates and Detection of Abnormal Cervical Cytology Between Conventional Papanicolaou Smear and Liquid-Based Cytology (Sure Path®).
Kituncharoen S; Tantbirojn P; Niruthisard S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(18):8491-4. PubMed ID: 26745107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of thin-layer cytology in patients undergoing cervical cone biopsy.
Bergeron C; Bishop J; Lemarie A; Cas F; Ayivi J; Huynh B; Barrasso R
Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(4):519-24. PubMed ID: 11480712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reappraisal of cytology-histology correlation in cervical cytology based on the recent American Society of Cytopathology guidelines (2017) at a cancer research centre.
Gupta R; Hariprasad R; Dhanasekaran K; Sodhani P; Mehrotra R; Kumar N; Gupta S
Cytopathology; 2020 Jan; 31(1):53-58. PubMed ID: 31535740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Efficacy in Abnormal Cervical Cell Detection between Liquid-based Cytology and Conventional Cytology.
Tanabodee J; Thepsuwan K; Karalak A; Laoaree O; Krachang A; Manmatt K; Anontwatanawong N
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(16):7381-4. PubMed ID: 26514540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the SurePath liquid-based Papanicolaou smear with the conventional Papanicolaou smear in a multisite direct-to-vial study.
Fremont-Smith M; Marino J; Griffin B; Spencer L; Bolick D
Cancer; 2004 Oct; 102(5):269-79. PubMed ID: 15386329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficacy assessment of CellSlide in liquid-based gynecologic cytology.
Chung JH; Park EJ; Choi YD; Kim HS; Lee YJ; Ko HM; Kim KS; Nam JH; Park CS
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Dec; 99(3):597-602. PubMed ID: 16137748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Neural-network-assisted analysis and microscopic rescreening in presumed negative cervical cytologic smears. A comparison.
Mango LJ; Valente PT
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):227-32. PubMed ID: 9479345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
