These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

467 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17921048)

  • 1. A quantitative approach of using genetic algorithm in designing a probability scoring system of an adverse drug reaction assessment system.
    Koh Y; Yap CW; Li SC
    Int J Med Inform; 2008 Jun; 77(6):421-30. PubMed ID: 17921048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A new method for assessing drug causation provided agreement with experts' judgment.
    Arimone Y; Bégaud B; Miremont-Salamé G; Fourrier-Réglat A; Molimard M; Moore N; Haramburu F
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Mar; 59(3):308-14. PubMed ID: 16488362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reporting of fatal adverse drug reactions.
    Liu BA; Knowles SR; Mittmann N; Einarson T; Shear NH
    Can J Clin Pharmacol; 2001; 8(2):84-8. PubMed ID: 11493936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficacy of an adverse drug reaction electronic reporting system integrated into a hospital information system.
    Ortega A; Aguinagalde A; Lacasa C; Aquerreta I; Fernández-Benítez M; Fernández LM
    Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Oct; 42(10):1491-6. PubMed ID: 18780808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An approach to the evaluation and documentation of adverse drug reaction.
    Goh CL
    Singapore Med J; 1989 Jun; 30(3):285-9. PubMed ID: 2531469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Spontaneous reporting system for the assessment of new, unknown and rare undesirable effects of drugs].
    Hartmann K; Kuhn M; Gartmann J
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1992 Sep; 122(38):1409-13. PubMed ID: 1411399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Therapeutic risk-assessment model for identifying patients with adverse drug reactions.
    Tschepik W; Segal R; Sherrin TP; Schneider DN; Hammond RL
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1990 Feb; 47(2):330-4. PubMed ID: 2309721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of measures of disproportionality for signal detection in spontaneous reporting systems for adverse drug reactions.
    van Puijenbroek EP; Bate A; Leufkens HG; Lindquist M; Orre R; Egberts AC
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2002; 11(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 11998548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How do pharmaceutical companies handle consumer adverse drug reaction reports? An overview based on a survey of French drug safety managers and officers.
    Fleuranceau-Morel P
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2002; 11(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 11998550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prevalence of adverse drug reactions with commonly prescribed drugs in different hospitals of Kathmandu valley.
    Jha N; Bajracharya O; Namgyal T
    Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ); 2007; 5(4):504-10. PubMed ID: 18604084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multidisciplinary program for detecting and evaluating adverse drug reactions.
    Keith MR; Bellanger-McCleery RA; Fuchs JE
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1989 Sep; 46(9):1809-12. PubMed ID: 2801715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nurses are increasingly involved in pharmacovigilance in Sweden.
    Ulfvarson J; Mejyr S; Bergman U
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2007 May; 16(5):532-7. PubMed ID: 17072915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of three algorithms used to evaluate adverse drug reactions.
    Michel DJ; Knodel LC
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1986 Jul; 43(7):1709-14. PubMed ID: 3752106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Organization and results of drug vigilance in France].
    Bégaud B; Chaslerie A; Haramburu F
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1994; 42(5):416-23. PubMed ID: 7973001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Under-reporting of serious adverse drug reactions in Sweden.
    Bäckström M; Mjörndal T; Dahlqvist R
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2004 Jul; 13(7):483-7. PubMed ID: 15269932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New guideline for tramadol usage following adverse drug reactions reported to the Iranian Pharmacovigilance Center.
    Gholami K; Shalviri G; Zarbakhsh A; Daryabari N; Yousefian S
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2007 Feb; 16(2):229-37. PubMed ID: 17063533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adverse drug reactions: a review of relevant factors.
    Ajayi FO; Sun H; Perry J
    J Clin Pharmacol; 2000 Oct; 40(10):1093-101. PubMed ID: 11028248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sensitivity and specificity of three methods of detecting adverse drug reactions.
    Berry LL; Segal R; Sherrin TP; Fudge KA
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1988 Jul; 45(7):1534-9. PubMed ID: 3046347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection of adverse drug reaction signals using an electronic health records database: Comparison of the Laboratory Extreme Abnormality Ratio (CLEAR) algorithm.
    Yoon D; Park MY; Choi NK; Park BJ; Kim JH; Park RW
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2012 Mar; 91(3):467-74. PubMed ID: 22237257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A potential causal association mining algorithm for screening adverse drug reactions in postmarketing surveillance.
    Ji Y; Ying H; Dews P; Mansour A; Tran J; Miller RE; Massanari RM
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2011 May; 15(3):428-37. PubMed ID: 21435986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.