BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17921223)

  • 1. Analysis of FRET signals in the presence of free donors and acceptors.
    Wlodarczyk J; Woehler A; Kobe F; Ponimaskin E; Zeug A; Neher E
    Biophys J; 2008 Feb; 94(3):986-1000. PubMed ID: 17921223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer-based stoichiometry in living cells.
    Hoppe A; Christensen K; Swanson JA
    Biophys J; 2002 Dec; 83(6):3652-64. PubMed ID: 12496132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) measurement with acceptor photobleaching and spectral unmixing.
    Gu Y; Di WL; Kelsell DP; Zicha D
    J Microsc; 2004 Aug; 215(Pt 2):162-73. PubMed ID: 15315503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliable measurement of the FRET sensitized-quenching transition factor for FRET quantification in living cells.
    Zhang J; Zhang L; Chai L; Yang F; Du M; Chen T
    Micron; 2016 Sep; 88():7-15. PubMed ID: 27239984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. satFRET: estimation of Förster resonance energy transfer by acceptor saturation.
    Beutler M; Makrogianneli K; Vermeij RJ; Keppler M; Ng T; Jovin TM; Heintzmann R
    Eur Biophys J; 2008 Nov; 38(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 18769914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Superior robustness of ExEm-spFRET to IIem-spFRET method in live-cell FRET measurement.
    Lin F; Zhang C; Du M; Wang L; Mai Z; Chen T
    J Microsc; 2018 Nov; 272(2):145-150. PubMed ID: 30338530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modelling Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) using anisotropy resolved multi-dimensional emission spectroscopy (ARMES).
    Gordon F; Elcoroaristizabal S; Ryder AG
    Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj; 2021 Feb; 1865(2):129770. PubMed ID: 33214128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Flow cytometric measurement of fluorescence (Förster) resonance energy transfer from cyan fluorescent protein to yellow fluorescent protein using single-laser excitation at 458 nm.
    He L; Bradrick TD; Karpova TS; Wu X; Fox MH; Fischer R; McNally JG; Knutson JR; Grammer AC; Lipsky PE
    Cytometry A; 2003 May; 53(1):39-54. PubMed ID: 12701131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anomalous surplus energy transfer observed with multiple FRET acceptors.
    Koushik SV; Blank PS; Vogel SS
    PLoS One; 2009 Nov; 4(11):e8031. PubMed ID: 19946626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving the spectral analysis of Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer in live cells: application to interferon receptors and Janus kinases.
    Krause CD; Digioia G; Izotova LS; Pestka S
    Cytokine; 2013 Oct; 64(1):272-85. PubMed ID: 23796694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fluorescent resonant energy transfer: correlated fluctuations of donor and acceptor.
    Yu ZG
    J Chem Phys; 2007 Dec; 127(22):221101. PubMed ID: 18081378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of heterogeneity and dark acceptor states on FRET: implications for using fluorescent protein donors and acceptors.
    Vogel SS; Nguyen TA; van der Meer BW; Blank PS
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e49593. PubMed ID: 23152925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Extending Förster resonance energy transfer measurements beyond 100 Å using common organic fluorophores: enhanced transfer in the presence of multiple acceptors.
    Maliwal BP; Raut S; Fudala R; D'Auria S; Marzullo VM; Luini A; Gryczynski I; Gryczynski Z
    J Biomed Opt; 2012 Jan; 17(1):011006. PubMed ID: 22352640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing FRET using spectral techniques.
    Leavesley SJ; Britain AL; Cichon LK; Nikolaev VO; Rich TC
    Cytometry A; 2013 Oct; 83(10):898-912. PubMed ID: 23929684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating the distance separating fluorescent protein FRET pairs.
    Vogel SS; van der Meer BW; Blank PS
    Methods; 2014 Mar; 66(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 23811334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A quantitative protocol for intensity-based live cell FRET imaging.
    Kaminski CF; Rees EJ; Schierle GS
    Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1076():445-54. PubMed ID: 24108638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimization of pairings and detection conditions for measurement of FRET between cyan and yellow fluorescent proteins.
    Rizzo MA; Springer G; Segawa K; Zipfel WR; Piston DW
    Microsc Microanal; 2006 Jun; 12(3):238-54. PubMed ID: 17481360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ma-PbFRET: multiple acceptors FRET measurement based on partial acceptor photobleaching.
    Yu H; Zhang J; Li H; Chen T
    Microsc Microanal; 2013 Feb; 19(1):171-9. PubMed ID: 23347498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative Förster resonance energy transfer efficiency measurements using simultaneous spectral unmixing of excitation and emission spectra.
    Mustafa S; Hannagan J; Rigby P; Pfleger K; Corry B
    J Biomed Opt; 2013 Feb; 18(2):26024. PubMed ID: 23423332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer of GFP and YFP by spectral imaging and quantitative acceptor photobleaching.
    Dinant C; van Royen ME; Vermeulen W; Houtsmuller AB
    J Microsc; 2008 Jul; 231(Pt 1):97-104. PubMed ID: 18638193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.