188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17922117)
1. Searching for two feature singletons in the visual scene: the localized attentional interference effect.
Wei P; Lü J; Müller HJ; Zhou X
Exp Brain Res; 2008 Feb; 185(2):175-88. PubMed ID: 17922117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Selecting and ignoring salient objects within and across dimensions in visual search.
Schubö A; Müller HJ
Brain Res; 2009 Aug; 1283():84-101. PubMed ID: 19501066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dimensional weighting of primary and secondary target-defining dimensions in visual search for singleton conjunction targets.
Weidner R; Müller HJ
Psychol Res; 2009 Mar; 73(2):198-211. PubMed ID: 19084996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Which search are you on? Adapting to color while searching for shape.
Bergmann N; Tünnermann J; Schubö A
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Feb; 82(2):457-477. PubMed ID: 31741316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Visual search for feature singletons: multiple mechanisms produce sequence effects in visual search.
Rangelov D; Müller HJ; Zehetleitner M
J Vis; 2013 Aug; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 23912066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Target uncertainty does not lead to greater singleton distractor interference when target shapes are not interchangeable with nontarget shapes.
Berry JH
Vision Res; 2013 Mar; 80():31-40. PubMed ID: 23385060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hybrid foraging search: Searching for multiple instances of multiple types of target.
Wolfe JM; Aizenman AM; Boettcher SE; Cain MS
Vision Res; 2016 Feb; 119():50-9. PubMed ID: 26731644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Visual search for singleton feature targets across dimensions: Stimulus- and expectancy-driven effects in dimensional weighting.
Muller HJ; Reimann B; Krummenacher J
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):1021-35. PubMed ID: 14585020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Expectancies modulate attentional capture by salient color singletons.
Geyer T; Müller HJ; Krummenacher J
Vision Res; 2008 May; 48(11):1315-26. PubMed ID: 18407311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.
Kumada T
Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Active suppression of salient-but-irrelevant stimuli does not underlie resistance to visual interference.
Barras C; Kerzel D
Biol Psychol; 2016 Dec; 121(Pt A):74-83. PubMed ID: 27756581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Visual and central attention share a capacity limitation when the demands for serial item selection in visual search are high.
Reimer CB; Schubert T
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Feb; 82(2):715-728. PubMed ID: 31974939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differences in the associability of relevant and irrelevant stimuli.
Dopson JC; Esber GR; Pearce JM
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2010 Apr; 36(2):258-67. PubMed ID: 20384405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evidence for attentional capture by a surprising color singleton in visual search.
Horstmann G
Psychol Sci; 2002 Nov; 13(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 12430832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The neural processing fate of singleton target and nontarget stimuli.
Akyürek EG; Dinkelbach A; Schubö A
Brain Res; 2010 Jan; 1307():115-33. PubMed ID: 19833112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Automatic attention lateral asymmetry in visual discrimination tasks.
Righi LL; Ribeiro-do-Valle LE
Psychol Res; 2011 Jan; 75(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 20559654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. More insight into the interplay of response selection and visual attention in dual-tasks: masked visual search and response selection are performed in parallel.
Reimer CB; Schubert T
Psychol Res; 2019 Apr; 83(3):459-475. PubMed ID: 28917014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intertrial target-feature changes do not lead to more distraction by singletons: target uncertainty does.
Lamy D; Yashar A
Vision Res; 2008 May; 48(10):1274-9. PubMed ID: 18395767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Target-nontarget similarity decreases search efficiency and increases stimulus-driven control in visual search.
Barras C; Kerzel D
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Oct; 79(7):2037-2043. PubMed ID: 28681179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of item clustering on visual search: It all depends on the nature of the visual search.
Xu Y
J Vis; 2010 Dec; 10(14):. PubMed ID: 21177422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
