These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17922347)

  • 1. Repeatability of the TEN(HL) test for detecting cochlear dead regions.
    Cairns S; Frith R; Munro KJ; Moore BC
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Oct; 46(10):575-84. PubMed ID: 17922347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identifying dead regions in the cochlea: psychophysical tuning curves and tone detection in threshold-equalizing noise.
    Summers V; Molis MR; Müsch H; Walden BE; Surr RK; Cord MT
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 12677110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a group of professional singers who have normal pure-tone hearing thresholds.
    Hamdan AL; Abouchacra KS; Zeki Al Hazzouri AG; Zaytoun G
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):360-77. PubMed ID: 18382377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cochlear origin of early hearing loss in vestibular schwannoma.
    Gouveris HT; Victor A; Mann WJ
    Laryngoscope; 2007 Apr; 117(4):680-3. PubMed ID: 17429875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reassessment of cochlear dead regions in hearing-impaired teenagers with severe-to-profound hearing loss.
    Munro KJ; Felthouse C; Moore BC; Kapadia S
    Int J Audiol; 2005 Aug; 44(8):470-7. PubMed ID: 16149242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Agreement between psychophysical tuning curves and the threshold equalizing noise test in dead region identification.
    Warnaar B; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Jun; 51(6):456-64. PubMed ID: 22429189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Frequency discrimination in ears with and without contralateral cochlear dead regions.
    Heggdal PO; Lind O; Brännström KJ
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Aug; 52(8):553-7. PubMed ID: 23786393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Test-retest repeatability of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Wagner W; Heppelmann G; Vonthein R; Zenner HP
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):378-91. PubMed ID: 18382378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Test-retest reliability of the acoustic stapedial reflex test in healthy neonates.
    Mazlan R; Kei J; Hickson L
    Ear Hear; 2009 Jun; 30(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 19322092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Application of the TEN test to hearing-impaired teenagers with severe-to-profound hearing loss.
    Moore BC; Killen T; Munro KJ
    Int J Audiol; 2003 Dec; 42(8):465-74. PubMed ID: 14658854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of cochlear hearing disorders: normative distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.
    Mills DM; Feeney MP; Gates GA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):778-92. PubMed ID: 17982366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of tinnitus patients with normal hearing sensitivity using TEOAEs and TEN test.
    Thabet EM
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Dec; 36(6):633-6. PubMed ID: 19285816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are There Cochlear Dead Regions Involved in Hearing Loss after Cisplatin Ototoxicity?
    Schultz C; Pecora Liberman PH; Schmidt Goffi-Gomez MV
    Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(5):253-257. PubMed ID: 31661686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors affecting sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions to ototoxic hearing loss.
    Reavis KM; Phillips DS; Fausti SA; Gordon JS; Helt WJ; Wilmington D; Bratt GW; Konrad-Martin D
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):875-93. PubMed ID: 18753950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prevalence of dead regions in subjects with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Vinay ; Moore BC
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):231-41. PubMed ID: 17496673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of ambient acoustic noise on the auditory steady-state response thresholds in normally hearing adults.
    Kei J; Smith D; Joseph S; Stopa J; Kang S; Darnell R
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 17715465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory steady-state responses to bone conduction stimuli in children with hearing loss.
    Swanepoel de W; Ebrahim S; Friedland P; Swanepoel A; Pottas L
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Dec; 72(12):1861-71. PubMed ID: 18963045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of auditory steady-state responses and auditory brainstem responses in audiometric assessment of adults with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Lin YH; Ho HC; Wu HP
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Apr; 36(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 18620826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnosing cochlear dead regions in children.
    Malicka AN; Munro KJ; Baker RJ
    Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):238-46. PubMed ID: 19935424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cortical electric response audiometry hearing threshold estimation: accuracy, speed, and the effects of stimulus presentation features.
    Lightfoot G; Kennedy V
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):443-56. PubMed ID: 16957496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.