These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17922574)

  • 1. Power to detect risk alleles using genome-wide tag SNP panels.
    Eberle MA; Ng PC; Kuhn K; Zhou L; Peiffer DA; Galver L; Viaud-Martinez KA; Lawley CT; Gunderson KL; Shen R; Murray SS
    PLoS Genet; 2007 Oct; 3(10):1827-37. PubMed ID: 17922574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Design of tag SNP whole genome genotyping arrays.
    Peiffer DA; Gunderson KL
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 529():51-61. PubMed ID: 19381970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tag SNP selection for candidate gene association studies using HapMap and gene resequencing data.
    Xu Z; Kaplan NL; Taylor JA
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2007 Oct; 15(10):1063-70. PubMed ID: 17568388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of weighted reference panels based on empirical estimates of ancestry for capturing untyped variation.
    Egyud MR; Gajdos ZK; Butler JL; Tischfield S; Le Marchand L; Kolonel LN; Haiman CA; Henderson BE; Hirschhorn JN
    Hum Genet; 2009 Apr; 125(3):295-303. PubMed ID: 19184111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Singleton SNPs in the human genome and implications for genome-wide association studies.
    Ke X; Taylor MS; Cardon LR
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2008 Apr; 16(4):506-15. PubMed ID: 18197193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. HapMap coverage for SNPs in the Japanese population.
    Takeuchi F; Serizawa M; Kato N
    J Hum Genet; 2008; 53(1):96-99. PubMed ID: 18043864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A compilation of tri-allelic SNPs from 1000 Genomes and use of the most polymorphic loci for a large-scale human identification panel.
    Phillips C; Amigo J; Tillmar AO; Peck MA; de la Puente M; Ruiz-Ramírez J; Bittner F; Idrizbegović Š; Wang Y; Parsons TJ; Lareu MV
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 May; 46():102232. PubMed ID: 31986343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficient association study design via power-optimized tag SNP selection.
    Han B; Kang HM; Seo MS; Zaitlen N; Eskin E
    Ann Hum Genet; 2008 Nov; 72(Pt 6):834-47. PubMed ID: 18702637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Power analysis for genome-wide association studies.
    Klein RJ
    BMC Genet; 2007 Aug; 8():58. PubMed ID: 17725844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. SNP selection for genes of iron metabolism in a study of genetic modifiers of hemochromatosis.
    Constantine CC; Gurrin LC; McLaren CE; Bahlo M; Anderson GJ; Vulpe CD; Forrest SM; Allen KJ; Gertig DM;
    BMC Med Genet; 2008 Mar; 9():18. PubMed ID: 18366708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of genome-wide power of genetic association studies based on empirical data from the HapMap project.
    Nannya Y; Taura K; Kurokawa M; Chiba S; Ogawa S
    Hum Mol Genet; 2007 Oct; 16(20):2494-505. PubMed ID: 17666406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Analysis and application of SNP and haplotype in the human genome].
    Li J; Pan YC; Li YX; Shi TL
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2005 Aug; 32(8):879-89. PubMed ID: 16231744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Whole-genome genotyping of haplotype tag single nucleotide polymorphisms.
    Gunderson KL; Kuhn KM; Steemers FJ; Ng P; Murray SS; Shen R
    Pharmacogenomics; 2006 Jun; 7(4):641-8. PubMed ID: 16768648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identifying rarer genetic variants for common complex diseases: diseased versus neutral discovery panels.
    Curtin K; Iles MM; Camp NJ
    Ann Hum Genet; 2009 Jan; 73(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 19132978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Information capture using SNPs from HapMap and whole-genome chips differs in a sample of inflammatory and cardiovascular gene-centric regions from genome-wide estimates.
    Wallace C; Dobson RJ; Munroe PB; Caulfield MJ
    Genome Res; 2007 Nov; 17(11):1596-602. PubMed ID: 17895426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tag SNP selection for Finnish individuals based on the CEPH Utah HapMap database.
    Willer CJ; Scott LJ; Bonnycastle LL; Jackson AU; Chines P; Pruim R; Bark CW; Tsai YY; Pugh EW; Doheny KF; Kinnunen L; Mohlke KL; Valle TT; Bergman RN; Tuomilehto J; Collins FS; Boehnke M
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Feb; 30(2):180-90. PubMed ID: 16374835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Power of genome-wide association studies in the presence of interacting loci.
    Pickrell J; Clerget-Darpoux F; Bourgain C
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Nov; 31(7):748-62. PubMed ID: 17508359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How well do HapMap SNPs capture the untyped SNPs?
    Tantoso E; Yang Y; Li KB
    BMC Genomics; 2006 Sep; 7():238. PubMed ID: 16982009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tag SNP selection for association studies.
    Stram DO
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 27(4):365-74. PubMed ID: 15372618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genome-wide selection of tag SNPs using multiple-marker correlation.
    Hao K
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Dec; 23(23):3178-84. PubMed ID: 18006555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.