These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17922721)

  • 1. Foraging for intermittently refuged prey: theory and field observations of a parasitoid.
    White JA; Andow DA
    J Anim Ecol; 2007 Nov; 76(6):1244-54. PubMed ID: 17922721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimal Bayesian foraging policies and prey population dynamics-some comments on Rodriguez-Girones and Vasquez.
    Olsson O; Holmgren NM
    Theor Popul Biol; 2000 Jun; 57(4):369-75. PubMed ID: 10900189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of prey density on foraging mode selection in juvenile lumpfish: balancing food intake with the metabolic cost of foraging.
    Killen SS; Brown JA; Gamperl AK
    J Anim Ecol; 2007 Jul; 76(4):814-25. PubMed ID: 17584387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Time allocation of a parasitoid foraging in heterogeneous vegetation: implications for host-parasitoid interactions.
    Bukovinszky T; Gols R; Hemerik L; Van Lenteren JC; Vet LE
    J Anim Ecol; 2007 Sep; 76(5):845-53. PubMed ID: 17714262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Behaviourally mediated indirect effects: interference competition increases predation mortality in foraging redshanks.
    Minderman J; Lind J; Cresswell W
    J Anim Ecol; 2006 May; 75(3):713-23. PubMed ID: 16689954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intra- and interspecific density-dependent dispersal in an aquatic prey-predator system.
    Hauzy C; Hulot FD; Gins A; Loreau M
    J Anim Ecol; 2007 May; 76(3):552-8. PubMed ID: 17439471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Individual specialization in diet by a generalist marine predator reflects specialization in foraging behaviour.
    Woo KJ; Elliott KH; Davidson M; Gaston AJ; Davoren GK
    J Anim Ecol; 2008 Nov; 77(6):1082-91. PubMed ID: 18624834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intake rates and the functional response in shorebirds (Charadriiformes) eating macro-invertebrates.
    Goss-Custard JD; West AD; Yates MG; Caldow RW; Stillman RA; Bardsley L; Castilla J; Castro M; Dierschke V; Durell SE; Eichhorn G; Ens BJ; Exo KM; Udayangani-Fernando PU; Ferns PN; Hockey PA; Gill JA; Johnstone I; Kalejta-Summers B; Masero JA; Moreira F; Nagarajan RV; Owens IP; Pacheco C; Perez-Hurtado A; Rogers D; Scheiffarth G; Sitters H; Sutherland WJ; Triplet P; Worrall DH; Zharikov Y; Zwarts L; Pettifor RA
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2006 Nov; 81(4):501-29. PubMed ID: 16863594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ecological mechanisms favouring behavioural diversification in the absence of morphological diversification: a theoretical examination using brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis).
    De Kerckhove D; McLaughlin RL; Noakes DL
    J Anim Ecol; 2006 Mar; 75(2):506-17. PubMed ID: 16638003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Continuous cycling of grouped vs. solitary strategy frequencies in a predator-prey model.
    Lett C; Auger P; Gaillard JM
    Theor Popul Biol; 2004 May; 65(3):263-70. PubMed ID: 15066422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. 'Take-away' foraging spatially uncouples predator and prey-attack distributions.
    Smallegange IM; van der Meer J; Sabelis MW
    J Anim Ecol; 2010 Jul; 79(4):769-76. PubMed ID: 20443987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Group formation stabilizes predator-prey dynamics.
    Fryxell JM; Mosser A; Sinclair AR; Packer C
    Nature; 2007 Oct; 449(7165):1041-3. PubMed ID: 17960242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prey processing in central place foragers.
    Rands SA; Houston AI; Gasson CE
    J Theor Biol; 2000 Jan; 202(2):161-74. PubMed ID: 10640435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Incompletely informed shorebirds that face a digestive constraint maximize net energy gain when exploiting patches.
    van Gils JA; Schenk IW; Bos O; Piersma T
    Am Nat; 2003 May; 161(5):777-93. PubMed ID: 12858284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Resource dynamics influence the strength of non-consumptive predator effects on prey.
    Preisser EL; Bolnick DI; Grabowski JH
    Ecol Lett; 2009 Apr; 12(4):315-23. PubMed ID: 19243407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The social structure and strategies of delphinids: predictions based on an ecological framework.
    Gowans S; Würsig B; Karczmarski L
    Adv Mar Biol; 2007; 53():195-294. PubMed ID: 17936137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of habitat fragmentation on cyclic population dynamics: a numerical study.
    Strohm S; Tyson R
    Bull Math Biol; 2009 Aug; 71(6):1323-48. PubMed ID: 19352778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimal forager against ideal free distributed prey.
    Garay J; Cressman R; Xu F; Varga Z; Cabello T
    Am Nat; 2015 Jul; 186(1):111-22. PubMed ID: 26098343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatial dynamics of communities with intraguild predation: the role of dispersal strategies.
    Amarasekare P
    Am Nat; 2007 Dec; 170(6):819-31. PubMed ID: 18171165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Deep-diving foraging behaviour of sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus).
    Watwood SL; Miller PJ; Johnson M; Madsen PT; Tyack PL
    J Anim Ecol; 2006 May; 75(3):814-25. PubMed ID: 16689963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.