These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1792298)

  • 1. The effects of hemispheric differences on feature perturbations.
    Polich J; Mackie KD; Spencer KM; Ohashi K
    Psychol Res; 1991; 53(4):274-80. PubMed ID: 1792298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Handedness and hemispheric differences for feature perturbations.
    Polich J; Morgan CD
    Brain Cogn; 1994 Jul; 25(2):220-34. PubMed ID: 7917243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hemispheric local/global processing revisited.
    Polich J; Aguilar V
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1990 Jun; 74(1):47-60. PubMed ID: 2392956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hemispheric patterns in visual search.
    Polich J
    Brain Cogn; 1984 Apr; 3(2):128-39. PubMed ID: 6537246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hemispheric representation of the central retina of commissurotomized subjects.
    Sugishita M; Hamilton CR; Sakuma I; Hemmi I
    Neuropsychologia; 1994 Apr; 32(4):399-415. PubMed ID: 8047248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hemispheric differences in visual search of simple line arrays.
    Polich J; DeFrancesco DP; Garon JF; Cohen W
    Psychol Res; 1990; 52(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 2377726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Effect of task difficulty on hemispheric differences in visual image processing].
    Hildebrandt H; Fresenborg I; Engel A
    Z Exp Psychol; 1995; 42(2):256-79. PubMed ID: 7497072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hemispheric specialization in the detection of subjective objects.
    Atchley RA; Atchley P
    Neuropsychologia; 1998 Dec; 36(12):1373-86. PubMed ID: 9863691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hemispheric differences for feature detection.
    Polich J; Lentz WH; Crossman DL
    Neuropsychologia; 1986; 24(4):591-5. PubMed ID: 3774144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of perceptual quality on the processing of human faces presented to the left and right cerebral hemispheres.
    Hellige JB; Corwin WH; Jonsson JE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Feb; 10(1):90-107. PubMed ID: 6242766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Right hemispheric dominance in gaze-triggered reflexive shift of attention in humans.
    Okada T; Sato W; Toichi M
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Nov; 62(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 16730869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual field differences in the magnitude of the Oppel-Kundt illusion vary with processing time.
    Rothwell B; Zaidel E
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Feb; 47(2):180-90. PubMed ID: 2304816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating effects of divided hemispheric processing on word recognition in foveal and extrafoveal displays: the evidence from Arabic.
    Almabruk AA; Paterson KB; McGowan V; Jordan TR
    PLoS One; 2011 Apr; 6(4):e18131. PubMed ID: 21559084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hemispheric differences are found in the identification, but not the detection, of low versus high spatial frequencies.
    Kitterle FL; Christman S; Hellige JB
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Oct; 48(4):297-306. PubMed ID: 2243753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hemispheric asymmetries in categorical judgments of direction versus coordinate judgments of velocity of motion.
    Christman SD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Jun; 9(2):298-305. PubMed ID: 12120792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hemispheric control of spatial attention.
    Reuter-Lorenz PA; Kinsbourne M; Moscovitch M
    Brain Cogn; 1990 Mar; 12(2):240-66. PubMed ID: 2340154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hemispheric differences in recognizing upper and lower facial displays of emotion.
    Prodan CI; Orbelo DM; Testa JA; Ross ED
    Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol; 2001; 14(4):206-12. PubMed ID: 11725213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptual interference and hemispheric specialization.
    Hines D; Glista J; Byers B
    Brain Cogn; 1985 Jan; 4(1):76-89. PubMed ID: 4027057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of retinal eccentricity on hemispheric dominance.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Stachurski M
    Neuropsychology; 2008 Nov; 22(6):738-45. PubMed ID: 18999347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Target detection in one visual field in the presence or absence of stimuli in the contralateral field by right- and left-handed subjects.
    Yund EW; Efron R; Nichols DR
    Brain Cogn; 1990 Jan; 12(1):117-27. PubMed ID: 2297429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.