These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17923120)

  • 1. The role of attention in subitizing.
    Railo H; Koivisto M; Revonsuo A; Hannula MM
    Cognition; 2008 Apr; 107(1):82-104. PubMed ID: 17923120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modulating attentional load affects numerosity estimation: evidence against a pre-attentive subitizing mechanism.
    Vetter P; Butterworth B; Bahrami B
    PLoS One; 2008 Sep; 3(9):e3269. PubMed ID: 18813345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A candidate for the attentional bottleneck: set-size specific modulation of the right TPJ during attentive enumeration.
    Vetter P; Butterworth B; Bahrami B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Mar; 23(3):728-36. PubMed ID: 20350059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Subitizing but not estimation of numerosity requires attentional resources.
    Burr DC; Turi M; Anobile G
    J Vis; 2010 Jun; 10(6):20. PubMed ID: 20884569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can subitizing survive the attentional blink? An ERP study.
    Xu X; Liu C
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Aug; 440(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 18556118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What eye fixation patterns tell us about subitizing.
    Sophian C; Crosby ME
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2008; 33(3):394-409. PubMed ID: 18473205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does subitizing reflect numerical estimation?
    Revkin SK; Piazza M; Izard V; Cohen L; Dehaene S
    Psychol Sci; 2008 Jun; 19(6):607-14. PubMed ID: 18578852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fractionation of the component processes underlying successful episodic encoding: a combined fMRI and divided-attention study.
    Uncapher MR; Rugg MD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Feb; 20(2):240-54. PubMed ID: 18275332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intentional subitizing: exploring the role of automaticity in enumeration.
    Pincham HL; Szűcs D
    Cognition; 2012 Aug; 124(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 22695378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cortical activation patterns during subitizing and counting.
    Vuokko E; Niemivirta M; Helenius P
    Brain Res; 2013 Feb; 1497():40-52. PubMed ID: 23268353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of eye movements in subitizing and counting.
    Watson DG; Maylor EA; Bruce LA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1389-99. PubMed ID: 18085951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Effects of size-equivalence and symmetry in enumeration tasks].
    Sakai K; Fujii A
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2007 Jun; 78(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 17657976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision.
    Trick LM; Pylyshyn ZW
    Psychol Rev; 1994 Jan; 101(1):80-102. PubMed ID: 8121961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Linking visual attention and number processing in the brain: the role of the temporo-parietal junction in small and large symbolic and nonsymbolic number comparison.
    Ansari D; Lyons IM; van Eimeren L; Xu F
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Nov; 19(11):1845-53. PubMed ID: 17958487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What enumeration studies can show us about spatial attention: evidence for limited capacity preattentive processing.
    Trick LM; Pylyshyn ZW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Apr; 19(2):331-51. PubMed ID: 8473843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. More than superstition: differential effects of featural heterogeneity and change on subitizing and counting.
    Trick LM
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Jul; 70(5):743-60. PubMed ID: 18613623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Early visual tagging: effects of target-distractor similarity and old age on search, subitization, and counting.
    Watson DG; Maylor EA; Allen GE; Bruce LA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Jun; 33(3):549-69. PubMed ID: 17563221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. One, two, three, many - subitizing in active touch.
    Plaisier MA; Bergmann Tiest WM; Kappers AM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jun; 131(2):163-70. PubMed ID: 19460685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What you see is what you set: sustained inattentional blindness and the capture of awareness.
    Most SB; Scholl BJ; Clifford ER; Simons DJ
    Psychol Rev; 2005 Jan; 112(1):217-42. PubMed ID: 15631594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attentional biases in social anxiety: an investigation using the inattentional blindness paradigm.
    Lee HJ; Telch MJ
    Behav Res Ther; 2008 Jul; 46(7):819-35. PubMed ID: 18486100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.