These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17923147)

  • 1. The carbon-sequestration potential of municipal wastewater treatment.
    Rosso D; Stenstrom MK
    Chemosphere; 2008 Feb; 70(8):1468-75. PubMed ID: 17923147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The potential of bio-methane as bio-fuel/bio-energy for reducing greenhouse gas emissions: a qualitative assessment for Europe in a life cycle perspective.
    Tilche A; Galatola M
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(11):1683-92. PubMed ID: 18547917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of the greenhouse effect impact of technologies used for energy recovery from municipal waste: a case for England.
    Papageorgiou A; Barton JR; Karagiannidis A
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Jul; 90(10):2999-3012. PubMed ID: 19482412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Carbon balance of anaerobic granulation process: carbon credit.
    Wong BT; Show KY; Lee DJ; Lai JY
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Mar; 100(5):1734-9. PubMed ID: 18990565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Greenhouse gas production in wastewater treatment: process selection is the major factor.
    Keller J; Hartley K
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(12):43-8. PubMed ID: 12926668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Options to reduce greenhouse gas emissions during wastewater treatment for agricultural use.
    Fine P; Hadas E
    Sci Total Environ; 2012 Feb; 416():289-99. PubMed ID: 22209373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimation of greenhouse gas generation in wastewater treatment plants--model development and application.
    Bani Shahabadi M; Yerushalmi L; Haghighat F
    Chemosphere; 2010 Feb; 78(9):1085-92. PubMed ID: 20110104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Energy conservation and recovery: two requirements for sustainable wastewater treatment.
    Stenstrom MK; Rosso D
    Water Environ Res; 2007 Aug; 79(8):819-20. PubMed ID: 17824526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The United States Department of Energy's Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships program: a collaborative approach to carbon management.
    Litynski JT; Klara SM; McIlvried HG; Srivastava RD
    Environ Int; 2006 Jan; 32(1):128-44. PubMed ID: 16054694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Greenhouse gas emission reduction and environmental quality improvement from implementation of aerobic waste treatment systems in swine farms.
    Vanotti MB; Szogi AA; Vives CA
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(4):759-66. PubMed ID: 18060761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anaerobic digestion: impact of future greenhouse gases mitigation policies on methane generation and usage.
    Greenfield PF; Batstone DJ
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(1-2):39-47. PubMed ID: 16180407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of the environmental impact of management measures for the biodegradable fraction of municipal solid waste in São Paulo City.
    Mendes MR; Aramaki T; Hanaki K
    Waste Manag; 2003; 23(5):403-9. PubMed ID: 12893012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Anaerobic treatment of municipal wastewater using the UASB-technology.
    Urban I; Weichgrebe D; Rosenwinkel KH
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(10):37-44. PubMed ID: 18048975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Greenhouse gases emission from municipal waste management: The role of separate collection.
    Calabrò PS
    Waste Manag; 2009 Jul; 29(7):2178-87. PubMed ID: 19318239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Role of primary sedimentation on plant-wide energy recovery and carbon footprint.
    Gori R; Giaccherini F; Jiang LM; Sobhani R; Rosso D
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 68(4):870-8. PubMed ID: 23985518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Carbon footprint of aerobic biological treatment of winery wastewater.
    Rosso D; Bolzonella D
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(5):1185-9. PubMed ID: 19717904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The climate footprint: a practical tool to address climate change.
    Janse T; Wiers P
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(4):157-63. PubMed ID: 17851216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating sustainable energy strategies for a water utility.
    Zakkour PD; Gochin RJ; Lester JN
    Environ Technol; 2002 Jul; 23(7):823-38. PubMed ID: 12164642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Domestic wastewater treatment as a net energy producer--can this be achieved?
    McCarty PL; Bae J; Kim J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Sep; 45(17):7100-6. PubMed ID: 21749111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impacts of urban forests on offsetting carbon emissions from industrial energy use in Hangzhou, China.
    Zhao M; Kong ZH; Escobedo FJ; Gao J
    J Environ Manage; 2010; 91(4):807-13. PubMed ID: 19914765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.