BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17923153)

  • 1. Quantitative determination of radio-opacity: equivalence of digital and film X-ray systems.
    Nomoto R; Mishima A; Kobayashi K; McCabe JF; Darvell BW; Watts DC; Momoi Y; Hirano S
    Dent Mater; 2008 Jan; 24(1):141-7. PubMed ID: 17923153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Comparative study on radio-opacity of dental composite resin materials'determination using film imaging and digital imaging].
    Li Y; Lin H; Zhang TJ
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2021 Oct; 53(5):995-1001. PubMed ID: 34650308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiopacity of dental materials using a digital X-ray system.
    Gu S; Rasimick BJ; Deutsch AS; Musikant BL
    Dent Mater; 2006 Aug; 22(8):765-70. PubMed ID: 16360848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of low-contrast perceptibility in dental restorative materials under the influence of ambient light conditions.
    Cruz AD; Lobo IC; Lemos AL; Aguiar MF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(5):20140360. PubMed ID: 25629721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiopacity Measurement of Restorative Resins Using Film and Three Digital Systems for Comparison with ISO 4049: International Standard.
    Kapila R; Matsuda Y; Araki K; Okano T; Nishikawa K; Sano T
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2015; 56(4):207-14. PubMed ID: 26657519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optical densities of dental resin composites: a comparison of CCD, storage phosphor, and Ektaspeed plus radiographic film.
    Farman TT; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ
    Gen Dent; 1996; 44(6):532-7. PubMed ID: 9515395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radiopacity of resin-based materials measured in film radiographs and storage phosphor plate (Digora).
    Sabbagh J; Vreven J; Leloup G
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(6):677-84. PubMed ID: 15646224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro perception of low-contrast features in digital, film, and digitized dental radiographs: a receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Grassl U; Schulze RK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 May; 103(5):694-701. PubMed ID: 17466887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiopacity evaluation of new root canal filling materials by digitalization of images.
    Tanomaru-Filho M; Jorge EG; Guerreiro Tanomaru JM; Gonçalves M
    J Endod; 2007 Mar; 33(3):249-51. PubMed ID: 17320706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differences in aluminum equivalent values of endodontic sealers: conventional versus digital radiography.
    Baksi BG; Sen BH; Eyuboglu TF
    J Endod; 2008 Sep; 34(9):1101-4. PubMed ID: 18718374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measuring the radiopacity of luting cements, dowels, and core build-up materials with a digital radiography system using a CCD sensor.
    Rasimick BJ; Gu S; Deutsch AS; Musikant BL
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(5):357-64. PubMed ID: 17559533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Calibrating automatic exposure control devices for digital radiography.
    Doyle P; Martin CJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):5475-85. PubMed ID: 17047264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of image quality in dental radiography, part 1: phantom validity.
    Yoshiura K; Kawazu T; Chikui T; Tatsumi M; Tokumori K; Tanaka T; Kanda S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Jan; 87(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 9927090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Image-receptor performance: a comparison of Trophy RVG UI sensor and Kodak Ektaspeed Plus film.
    Ludlow J; Mol A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jan; 91(1):109-19. PubMed ID: 11174581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effective dosages for recording Veraviewepocs dental panoramic images: analog film, digital, and panoramic scout for CBCT.
    Garcia Silva MA; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Gründler K; Visser H; Hirsch E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):571-7. PubMed ID: 18602314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radiopacity of endodontic materials on film and a digital sensor.
    Rasimick BJ; Shah RP; Musikant BL; Deutsch AS
    J Endod; 2007 Sep; 33(9):1098-101. PubMed ID: 17931942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of ceramic thickness and curing mode on the polymerization shrinkage kinetics of dual-cured resin cements.
    Lee IB; An W; Chang J; Um CM
    Dent Mater; 2008 Aug; 24(8):1141-7. PubMed ID: 18433858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radiopacity of endodontic sealers: development of a new method for direct measurement.
    Tagger M; Katz A
    J Endod; 2003 Nov; 29(11):751-5. PubMed ID: 14651284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determination of X-ray mass attenuation coefficients using HPGe detector.
    Sharanabasappa ; Kerur BR; Anilkumar S; Hanumaiah B
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2010 Jan; 68(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 19726203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.