These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17923153)

  • 21. Is digital better in dental radiography?
    Zdesar U; Fortuna T; Valantic B; Skrk D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):138-9. PubMed ID: 18375462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Densitometric evaluation of three intra-oral radiographic films.
    Seeliger JE; Prinsloo JJ
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1989 May; 44(5):177-9. PubMed ID: 2635441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [A dynamic fitness test and a new method to measure the thickness of film using the digital subtraction system of X-ray photographic density].
    Hanatani S
    Tsurumi Shigaku; 1989 Jan; 15(1):119-30. PubMed ID: 2697107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. COBRA-STAR, a five frame point-projection x-ray imaging system for 1 MA scale wire-array Z pinches.
    Douglass JD; Hammer DA
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2008 Mar; 79(3):033503. PubMed ID: 18377006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of conventional and digital radiography for radiometric differentiation of dental cements.
    Baksi BG; Ermis RB
    Quintessence Int; 2007 Oct; 38(9):e532-6. PubMed ID: 17873973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Film thicknesses of recently introduced luting cements.
    Kious AR; Roberts HW; Brackett WW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Mar; 101(3):189-92. PubMed ID: 19231571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Backscatter from metal surfaces in diagnostic radiology.
    Kodera Y; Schmidt RA; Chan HP; Doi K
    Radiology; 1984 Jan; 150(1):231-4. PubMed ID: 6689765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Exposure variability and image quality in computed radiography.
    Fauber TL
    Radiol Technol; 2009; 80(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 19153197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Film thickness of resin cements used with adhesive systems.
    Zahra VN; Abate PF; Macchi RL
    Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2008; 21(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 18841743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Are conventional dental x-ray films a thing of the past?].
    Sanderink GC
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1995 Dec; 102(12):496-8. PubMed ID: 11836821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [X-ray hardening correction for ICT in testing workpiece].
    Peng GH; Cai XH; Han Z; Yang XH
    Guang Pu Xue Yu Guang Pu Fen Xi; 2008 Jun; 28(6):1426-9. PubMed ID: 18800741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of the Radiopacities of Bulk-fill Restoratives Using Two Digital Radiography Systems.
    Yasa E; Yasa B; Aglarci OS; Ertas ET
    Oper Dent; 2015; 40(5):E197-205. PubMed ID: 26237642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An examination of mass thickness measurements with X-ray sources.
    Mincong C; Hongmei L; Ziyu C; Ji S
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Oct; 66(10):1387-91. PubMed ID: 18550378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of time and exposure to air on radiographic contrast and relative film speed of three rapid dental film processing solutions.
    Matthee MJ; Seeliger JE; Prinsloo NJ; Swart NG
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1993 Jan; 48(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 9511608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Radiopacity of endodontic materials using two models for conversion to millimeters of aluminum.
    Ochoa-RodrÍguez VM; Wilches-Visbal JH; Roma B; Coaguila-Llerena H; Tanomaru-Filho M; GonÇalves A; Spin-Neto R; Faria G
    Braz Oral Res; 2020; 34():e080. PubMed ID: 32696910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Characteristics of Kodak Insight, an F-speed intraoral film.
    Ludlow JB; Platin E; Mol A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jan; 91(1):120-9. PubMed ID: 11174582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of bit depth and kVp of digital radiography for detection of subtle differences.
    Heo MS; Choi DH; Benavides E; Huh KH; Yi WJ; Lee SS; Choi SC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):278-83. PubMed ID: 19272812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of aluminum-copper alloy filtration on photon spectra, air kerma rate and image contrast.
    Gonçalves A; Rollo JM; Gonçalves M; Haiter Neto F; Bóscolo FN
    Braz Dent J; 2004; 15(3):214-9. PubMed ID: 15798826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparative physical evaluation of four X-ray films.
    Egyed M; Shearer DR
    Radiol Manage; 1981 Sep; 3(4):11-20. PubMed ID: 10253292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Is the lead-equivalent suited for rating protection properties of lead-free radiation protective clothing?].
    Eder H; Panzer W; Schöfer H
    Rofo; 2005 Mar; 177(3):399-404. PubMed ID: 15719303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.