These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
362 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17923826)
1. [Pharmacological induction of labour: benefits and risks]. Romanelli M; Ribiani E; Burnelli L; Luzi G; Affronti G; Di Renzo GC Minerva Ginecol; 2007 Aug; 59(4):347-55. PubMed ID: 17923826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Dinoprostone: slow release vaginal insert (Propess) and intracervical gel (Prepidil) for the induction of labour with unriped cervix]. Grignaffini A; Soncini E; Anfuso S; Ronzoni E Minerva Ginecol; 2004 Oct; 56(5):413-8. PubMed ID: 15531859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Uterine hyperstimulation following cervix ripening with dinoprostone in a vaginal insert system]. Brouwers JM; Briët JW; Brouwers JR Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2004 Jun; 148(26):1300-3. PubMed ID: 15279216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of two preparations of dinoprostone for pre-induction of labour in nulliparous women with very unfavourable cervical condition: a randomised clinical trial. Facchinetti F; Venturini P; Verocchi G; Volpe A Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Apr; 119(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 15808378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of intracervical and intravaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and labour induction in patients with an unfavourable cervix. Srisomboon J; Piyamongkol W; Aiewsakul P J Med Assoc Thai; 1997 Mar; 80(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 9175387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Study of the effect of Propess for ripening of the unfavorable cervix for the induction of labor due to medical indications]. Nikolov A; Dimitrov A; Krŭsteva K; Nashar S Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2003; 42(3):5-8. PubMed ID: 12858482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Elective cervical ripening in women beyond the 290th day of pregnancy: a randomized trial comparing 2 dinoprostone preparations. Facchinetti F; Venturini P; Fazzio M; Volpe A J Reprod Med; 2007 Oct; 52(10):945-9. PubMed ID: 17977171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial. Denguezli W; Trimech A; Haddad A; Hajjaji A; Saidani Z; Faleh R; Sakouhi M Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Uterine hyperstimulation following cervix ripening with dinoprostone in a vaginal insert system]. Veerman HM Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Jan; 149(2):105-6; author reply 106. PubMed ID: 15688844 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative study of misoprostol vs dinoprostone for induction of labour. Kulshreshtha S; Sharma P; Mohan G; Singh S; Singh S Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2007; 51(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 17877293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective randomised controlled trial to compare safety and efficacy of intravaginal Misoprostol with intracervical Cerviprime for induction of labour with unfavourable cervix. Krithika KS; Aggarwal N; Suri V J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Apr; 28(3):294-7. PubMed ID: 18569471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cervical ripening and induction of labor by prostaglandin E2: a comparison between intracervical gel and vaginal pessary. D'Aniello G; Bocchi C; Florio P; Ignacchiti E; Guidoni CG; Centini G; Cito G; Picciolini E; Severi FM; Petraglia F J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2003 Sep; 14(3):158-62. PubMed ID: 14694970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outpatient misoprostol compared with dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial. Meyer M; Pflum J; Howard D Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):466-72. PubMed ID: 15738009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial. Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of extraamniotic Foley catheter and intracervical prostaglandin E gel for preinduction cervical ripening. Dalui R; Suri V; Ray P; Gupta I Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Apr; 84(4):362-7. PubMed ID: 15762966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Induction of labour in nulliparous and multiparous women: a UK, multicentre, open-label study of intravaginal misoprostol in comparison with dinoprostone. Calder AA; Loughney AD; Weir CJ; Barber JW BJOG; 2008 Sep; 115(10):1279-88. PubMed ID: 18715414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Induction of labor with a new intracervically administered prostaglandin E2 gel. Report of initial experience]. Ammann M; Schneider H; Gyr T; Dürig P; Hänggi W; Huber B Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1992 Oct; 52(10):602-5. PubMed ID: 1294435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Experiences with labor induction at term with a PGE2 gel (Prepidil Gel) in unripe cervix]. Bredow V; Straube W; Göretzlehner G Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1990 Nov; 50(11):865-9. PubMed ID: 2283012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of intracervical Foley catheter used alone or combined with a single dose of dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening: a randomised study. Chowdhary A; Bagga R; Jasvinder Kalra ; Jain V; Saha SC; Kumar P J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 May; 39(4):461-467. PubMed ID: 30747025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of intravaginal and two intracervical prostaglandin E2 gels in pre-induction of labour. Ekblad U; Erkkola R; Pirhonen J Ann Chir Gynaecol Suppl; 1994; 208():64-7. PubMed ID: 8092777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]