367 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17923826)
1. [Pharmacological induction of labour: benefits and risks].
Romanelli M; Ribiani E; Burnelli L; Luzi G; Affronti G; Di Renzo GC
Minerva Ginecol; 2007 Aug; 59(4):347-55. PubMed ID: 17923826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Dinoprostone: slow release vaginal insert (Propess) and intracervical gel (Prepidil) for the induction of labour with unriped cervix].
Grignaffini A; Soncini E; Anfuso S; Ronzoni E
Minerva Ginecol; 2004 Oct; 56(5):413-8. PubMed ID: 15531859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Uterine hyperstimulation following cervix ripening with dinoprostone in a vaginal insert system].
Brouwers JM; Briët JW; Brouwers JR
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2004 Jun; 148(26):1300-3. PubMed ID: 15279216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of two preparations of dinoprostone for pre-induction of labour in nulliparous women with very unfavourable cervical condition: a randomised clinical trial.
Facchinetti F; Venturini P; Verocchi G; Volpe A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Apr; 119(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 15808378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of intracervical and intravaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and labour induction in patients with an unfavourable cervix.
Srisomboon J; Piyamongkol W; Aiewsakul P
J Med Assoc Thai; 1997 Mar; 80(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 9175387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Study of the effect of Propess for ripening of the unfavorable cervix for the induction of labor due to medical indications].
Nikolov A; Dimitrov A; Krŭsteva K; Nashar S
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2003; 42(3):5-8. PubMed ID: 12858482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Elective cervical ripening in women beyond the 290th day of pregnancy: a randomized trial comparing 2 dinoprostone preparations.
Facchinetti F; Venturini P; Fazzio M; Volpe A
J Reprod Med; 2007 Oct; 52(10):945-9. PubMed ID: 17977171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
Denguezli W; Trimech A; Haddad A; Hajjaji A; Saidani Z; Faleh R; Sakouhi M
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Uterine hyperstimulation following cervix ripening with dinoprostone in a vaginal insert system].
Veerman HM
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Jan; 149(2):105-6; author reply 106. PubMed ID: 15688844
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative study of misoprostol vs dinoprostone for induction of labour.
Kulshreshtha S; Sharma P; Mohan G; Singh S; Singh S
Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2007; 51(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 17877293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective randomised controlled trial to compare safety and efficacy of intravaginal Misoprostol with intracervical Cerviprime for induction of labour with unfavourable cervix.
Krithika KS; Aggarwal N; Suri V
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Apr; 28(3):294-7. PubMed ID: 18569471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cervical ripening and induction of labor by prostaglandin E2: a comparison between intracervical gel and vaginal pessary.
D'Aniello G; Bocchi C; Florio P; Ignacchiti E; Guidoni CG; Centini G; Cito G; Picciolini E; Severi FM; Petraglia F
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2003 Sep; 14(3):158-62. PubMed ID: 14694970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outpatient misoprostol compared with dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
Meyer M; Pflum J; Howard D
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):466-72. PubMed ID: 15738009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of extraamniotic Foley catheter and intracervical prostaglandin E gel for preinduction cervical ripening.
Dalui R; Suri V; Ray P; Gupta I
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Apr; 84(4):362-7. PubMed ID: 15762966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Induction of labour in nulliparous and multiparous women: a UK, multicentre, open-label study of intravaginal misoprostol in comparison with dinoprostone.
Calder AA; Loughney AD; Weir CJ; Barber JW
BJOG; 2008 Sep; 115(10):1279-88. PubMed ID: 18715414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Induction of labor with a new intracervically administered prostaglandin E2 gel. Report of initial experience].
Ammann M; Schneider H; Gyr T; Dürig P; Hänggi W; Huber B
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1992 Oct; 52(10):602-5. PubMed ID: 1294435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Experiences with labor induction at term with a PGE2 gel (Prepidil Gel) in unripe cervix].
Bredow V; Straube W; Göretzlehner G
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1990 Nov; 50(11):865-9. PubMed ID: 2283012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of intracervical Foley catheter used alone or combined with a single dose of dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening: a randomised study.
Chowdhary A; Bagga R; Jasvinder Kalra ; Jain V; Saha SC; Kumar P
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 May; 39(4):461-467. PubMed ID: 30747025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of intravaginal and two intracervical prostaglandin E2 gels in pre-induction of labour.
Ekblad U; Erkkola R; Pirhonen J
Ann Chir Gynaecol Suppl; 1994; 208():64-7. PubMed ID: 8092777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
