BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

636 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17924449)

  • 1. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical carcinoma patients, comparing results with total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy cases. The future is now?
    Sert B; Abeler V
    Int J Med Robot; 2007 Sep; 3(3):224-8. PubMed ID: 17924449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
    Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robotic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical carcinoma: a pilot study.
    Kim YT; Kim SW; Hyung WJ; Lee SJ; Nam EJ; Lee WJ
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Feb; 108(2):312-6. PubMed ID: 18035405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A case matched analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy.
    Estape R; Lambrou N; Diaz R; Estape E; Dunkin N; Rivera A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Jun; 113(3):357-61. PubMed ID: 19345987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type II-III) with pelvic lymphadenectomy in early invasive cervical cancer.
    Gil-Moreno A; Puig O; Pérez-Benavente MA; Díaz B; Vergés R; De la Torre J; Martínez-Palones JM; Xercavins J
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 15904613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Vaginal robot-assisted radical hysterectomy (VRARH) after laparoscopic staging: feasibility and operative results.
    Oleszczuk A; Köhler C; Paulick J; Schneider A; Lanowska M
    Int J Med Robot; 2009 Mar; 5(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 19153971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The outcome of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer: a prospective analysis of 295 patients.
    Chen Y; Xu H; Li Y; Wang D; Li J; Yuan J; Liang Z
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2847-55. PubMed ID: 18649105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
    Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of laparascopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
    Steed H; Rosen B; Murphy J; Laframboise S; De Petrillo D; Covens A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Jun; 93(3):588-93. PubMed ID: 15196849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy?
    Seamon LG; Cohn DE; Henretta MS; Kim KH; Carlson MJ; Phillips GS; Fowler JM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19168206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The value of laparoscopic surgery to stage gynecological cancers: present and future.
    Mettler L; Meinhold-Heerlein I
    Minerva Ginecol; 2009 Aug; 61(4):319-37. PubMed ID: 19745797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy.
    Magrina JF; Kho RM; Weaver AL; Montero RP; Magtibay PM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Apr; 109(1):86-91. PubMed ID: 18279944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy using pulsed bipolar system: comparison with conventional bipolar electrosurgery.
    Lee CL; Huang KG; Wang CJ; Lee PS; Hwang LL
    Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Jun; 105(3):620-4. PubMed ID: 17303226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
    Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robotic radical hysterectomy: Technical aspects.
    Magrina JF; Kho R; Magtibay PM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 19176237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robotics versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a multicenter study.
    Tinelli R; Malzoni M; Cosentino F; Perone C; Fusco A; Cicinelli E; Nezhat F
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Sep; 18(9):2622-8. PubMed ID: 21394663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with Ib1 stage cervical cancer: analysis of surgical and oncological outcome.
    Pellegrino A; Vizza E; Fruscio R; Villa A; Corrado G; Villa M; Dell'Anna T; Vitobello D
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2009 Jan; 35(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 18760562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy using harmonic shears.
    Nezhat F; Mahdavi A; Nagarsheth NP
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 16431319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy and laparotomy in the treatment of Ib-IIa cervical cancer.
    Li G; Yan X; Shang H; Wang G; Chen L; Han Y
    Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Apr; 105(1):176-80. PubMed ID: 17197013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recent advances in the surgical management of cervical cancer.
    Zakashansky K; Bradley WH; Chuang L; Rahaman J; Dottino P
    Mt Sinai J Med; 2009 Dec; 76(6):567-76. PubMed ID: 20014423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.