These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1792461)

  • 1. A general parametric approach to the meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
    Whitehead A; Whitehead J
    Stat Med; 1991 Nov; 10(11):1665-77. PubMed ID: 1792461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical methods for the meta-analysis of cluster randomization trials.
    Donner A; Piaggio G; Villar J
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2001 Oct; 10(5):325-38. PubMed ID: 11697225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combining summaries of binary outcomes with those of continuous outcomes in a meta-analysis.
    Whitehead A; Bailey AJ; Elbourne D
    J Biopharm Stat; 1999 Mar; 9(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 10091907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Bayesian meta-analytic approach for safety signal detection in randomized clinical trials.
    Odani M; Fukimbara S; Sato T
    Clin Trials; 2017 Apr; 14(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 28059578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Borrowing strength from external trials in a meta-analysis.
    Higgins JP; Whitehead A
    Stat Med; 1996 Dec; 15(24):2733-49. PubMed ID: 8981683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An empirical study of the possible relation of treatment differences to quality scores in controlled randomized clinical trials.
    Emerson JD; Burdick E; Hoaglin DC; Mosteller F; Chalmers TC
    Control Clin Trials; 1990 Oct; 11(5):339-52. PubMed ID: 1963128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of networks of randomized trials.
    Salanti G; Higgins JP; Ades AE; Ioannidis JP
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Jun; 17(3):279-301. PubMed ID: 17925316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Trial Sequential Analysis in systematic reviews with meta-analysis.
    Wetterslev J; Jakobsen JC; Gluud C
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Mar; 17(1):39. PubMed ID: 28264661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Incorporation of sequential trials into a fixed effects meta-analysis.
    Todd S
    Stat Med; 1997 Dec; 16(24):2915-25. PubMed ID: 9483723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Standardized mean differences in individually-randomized and cluster-randomized trials, with applications to meta-analysis.
    White IR; Thomas J
    Clin Trials; 2005; 2(2):141-51. PubMed ID: 16279136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Empirical Bayes estimation and inference for the random effects model with binary response.
    Waclawiw MA; Liang KY
    Stat Med; 1994 Mar 15-Apr 15; 13(5-7):541-51. PubMed ID: 8023034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitative synthesis in systematic reviews.
    Lau J; Ioannidis JP; Schmid CH
    Ann Intern Med; 1997 Nov; 127(9):820-6. PubMed ID: 9382404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Meta-analyses involving cluster randomization trials: a review of published literature in health care.
    Laopaiboon M
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2003 Dec; 12(6):515-30. PubMed ID: 14653354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reporting and handling missing outcome data in mental health: a systematic review of Cochrane systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Spineli LM; Pandis N; Salanti G
    Res Synth Methods; 2015 Jun; 6(2):175-87. PubMed ID: 26099485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Designing multiregional trials under the discrete random effects model.
    Lan KK; Pinheiro J; Chen F
    J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(2):415-28. PubMed ID: 24605977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Meta-analysis of continuous outcome data from individual patients.
    Higgins JP; Whitehead A; Turner RM; Omar RZ; Thompson SG
    Stat Med; 2001 Aug; 20(15):2219-41. PubMed ID: 11468761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sensitivity subgroup analysis based on single-center vs. multi-center trial status when interpreting meta-analyses pooled estimates: the logical way forward.
    Alexander PE; Bonner AJ; Agarwal A; Li SA; Hariharan A; Izhar Z; Bhatnagar N; Alba C; Akl EA; Fei Y; Guyatt GH; Beyene J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jun; 74():80-92. PubMed ID: 26597972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Increasing the degrees of freedom in existing group randomized trials: the df* approach.
    Blitstein JL; Hannan PJ; Murray DM; Shadish WR
    Eval Rev; 2005 Jun; 29(3):241-67. PubMed ID: 15860765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An evaluation of homogeneity tests in meta-analyses in pain using simulations of individual patient data.
    Gavaghan DJ; Moore AR; McQuay HJ
    Pain; 2000 Apr; 85(3):415-424. PubMed ID: 10781914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.