These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17924788)

  • 41. Discrete-trial vs. continuous free-operant procedures in assessing whether reinforcement context affects reinforcement value.
    McDevitt MA; Bell MC
    Behav Processes; 2008 Mar; 77(3):376-83. PubMed ID: 18054442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Training delays reduce the choose-short effect with keylight, but not with food, duration samples in pigeons.
    Grant DS
    Behav Processes; 2007 Feb; 74(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 17079092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Preference as a function of absolute response durations.
    Shimp CP; Sabulsky SL; Childers LJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1990 Jul; 16(3):288-97. PubMed ID: 2398340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Discrimination of duration ratios.
    Fetterman JG; Dreyfus LR; Stubbs DA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1989 Jul; 15(3):253-63. PubMed ID: 2760563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Errorless learning of a conditional temporal discrimination.
    Arantes J; Machado A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2011 Jan; 95(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 21541167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Signals, resistance to change, and conditioned reinforcement in a multiple schedule.
    Bell MC; Gomez BE; Kessler K
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jun; 78(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 18355988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The role of terminal-link stimuli in concurrent-chain schedules: revisited using a behavioral-history procedure.
    Ono K; Yamagishi N; Aotsuka T; Hojo R; Nogawa Y
    Behav Processes; 2005 Aug; 70(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 15967283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Control of pigeons' matching-to-sample performance by differential sample response requirements.
    Hogan DE; Zentall TR; Pace G
    Am J Psychol; 1983; 96(1):37-49. PubMed ID: 6859346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Acquisition versus steady state in the time-left experiment.
    Machado A; Vasconcelos M
    Behav Processes; 2006 Feb; 71(2-3):172-87. PubMed ID: 16343806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effects of delays on human performance on a temporal discrimination procedure: evidence of a choose-short effect.
    Lieving LM; Lane SD; Cherek DR; Tcheremissine OV
    Behav Processes; 2006 Feb; 71(2-3):135-43. PubMed ID: 16289517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Some effects of procedural variations on choice responding in concurrent chains.
    Moore J
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2009 Nov; 92(3):345-65. PubMed ID: 20514166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Rapid acquisition of preference in concurrent schedules: effects of d-amphetamine on sensitivity to reinforcement amount.
    Maguire DR; Rodewald AM; Hughes CE; Pitts RC
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):238-43. PubMed ID: 19429218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The value hypothesis and acquisition of preference in concurrent chains.
    Grace RC
    Anim Learn Behav; 2002 Feb; 30(1):21-33. PubMed ID: 12017965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Rapid acquisition of preference in concurrent chains.
    Grace RC; Bragason O; McLean AP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Sep; 80(2):235-52. PubMed ID: 14674731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Feature-short and feature-long discrimination learning in the pigeon: conditional control of a two-event temporal map.
    Nakajima S
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jan; 80(1):80-9. PubMed ID: 18977418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Pigeons learn signal-food intervals independently in a multiple peak procedure.
    Rice N; Grace RC; Kyonka EG
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2014 Apr; 40(2):241-8. PubMed ID: 24364669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Rapid acquisition of preference in concurrent chains: effects of d-amphetamine on sensitivity to reinforcement delay.
    Ta WM; Pitts RC; Hughes CE; McLean AP; Grace RC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2008 Jan; 89(1):71-91. PubMed ID: 18338676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Pigeons may not use dual coding in the radial maze analog task.
    DiGian KA; Zentall TR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2007 Jul; 33(3):262-72. PubMed ID: 17620025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Time-sharing in pigeons: Independent effects of gap duration, position and discriminability from the timed signal.
    Buhusi CV; Paskalis JP; Cerutti DT
    Behav Processes; 2006 Feb; 71(2-3):116-25. PubMed ID: 16414210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Choice with uncertain outcomes: conditioned reinforcement effects.
    Dunn R; Spetch ML
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 Mar; 53(2):201-18. PubMed ID: 2324663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.