These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17924810)

  • 1. Target selection during bimanual reaching to direct cues is unaffected by the perceptual similarity of the targets.
    Albert NB; Weigelt M; Hazeltine E; Ivry RB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Oct; 33(5):1107-16. PubMed ID: 17924810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bimanual cross-talk during reaching movements is primarily related to response selection, not the specification of motor parameters.
    Hazeltine E; Diedrichsen J; Kennerley SW; Ivry RB
    Psychol Res; 2003 Feb; 67(1):56-70. PubMed ID: 12589450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Goal-selection and movement-related conflict during bimanual reaching movements.
    Diedrichsen J; Grafton S; Albert N; Hazeltine E; Ivry RB
    Cereb Cortex; 2006 Dec; 16(12):1729-38. PubMed ID: 16400162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bimanual interference in rapid discrete movements is task specific and occurs at multiple levels of processing.
    Obhi SS; Goodale MA
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Sep; 94(3):1861-8. PubMed ID: 15917318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conceptual binding: integrated visual cues reduce processing costs in bimanual movements.
    Wenderoth N; Van Dooren M; Vandebroek A; De Vos J; Vangheluwe S; Stinear CM; Byblow WD; Swinnen SP
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Jul; 102(1):302-11. PubMed ID: 19369359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Moving to directly cued locations abolishes spatial interference during bimanual actions.
    Diedrichsen J; Hazeltine E; Kennerley S; Ivry RB
    Psychol Sci; 2001 Nov; 12(6):493-8. PubMed ID: 11760137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Independent on-line control of the two hands during bimanual reaching.
    Diedrichsen J; Nambisan R; Kennerley SW; Ivry RB
    Eur J Neurosci; 2004 Mar; 19(6):1643-52. PubMed ID: 15066160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bimanual interference with compatible and incompatible tool transformations.
    Massen C; Sattler C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Oct; 135(2):201-8. PubMed ID: 20619385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bimanual reaches with symbolic cues exhibit errors in target selection.
    Blinch J; Cameron BD; Franks IM; Chua R
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Aug; 212(4):541-54. PubMed ID: 21687986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Re-examining structural constraints on the initiation of bimanual movements: the role of starting locations, movement amplitudes, and target locations.
    Weigelt M
    Hum Mov Sci; 2007 Apr; 26(2):212-25. PubMed ID: 17343946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual attention during the preparation of bimanual movements.
    Baldauf D; Deubel H
    Vision Res; 2008 Feb; 48(4):549-63. PubMed ID: 18206205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intermanual interactions related to movement amplitudes and endpoint locations.
    Heuer H; Klein W
    J Mot Behav; 2006 Mar; 38(2):126-38. PubMed ID: 16531395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Increased cognitive demands boost the spatial interference effect in bimanual pointing.
    Stanciu I; Biehl SC; Hesse C
    Psychol Res; 2017 May; 81(3):582-595. PubMed ID: 26935561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of switching between targets on the performance of a simple motor skill.
    Fairbrother JT; Brueckner S; Barros JA
    Hum Mov Sci; 2009 Feb; 28(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 18842312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intermanual cross-talk effects in unimanual choice reactions.
    Heuer H; Kleinsorge T; Spijkers W; Steglich C
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Aug; 57(6):993-1018. PubMed ID: 15370513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bimanual interference associated with the selection of target locations.
    Diedrichsen J; Ivry RB; Hazeltine E; Kennerley S; Cohen A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Feb; 29(1):64-77. PubMed ID: 12669748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual cues influence motor coordination: behavioral results and potential neural mechanisms mediating perception-action coupling and response selection.
    Wenderoth N; Weigelt M
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 174():179-88. PubMed ID: 19477339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evidence from a response choice task reveals a selection bias in the attentional cueing paradigm.
    Wilson DE; Pratt J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Nov; 126(3):216-25. PubMed ID: 17280639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of movement cues on intermanual interactions.
    Heuer H; Klein W
    Psychol Res; 2006 Jul; 70(4):229-44. PubMed ID: 16082546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The neural dynamics of timed motor tasks: evidence from a synchronization-continuation paradigm.
    Serrien DJ
    Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Mar; 27(6):1553-60. PubMed ID: 18336571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.