These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

827 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17924955)

  • 1. Male versus female mate choice: sexual selection and the evolution of species recognition via reinforcement.
    Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2007 Dec; 61(12):2772-89. PubMed ID: 17924955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The evolution of female mating preferences: differentiation from species with promiscuous males can promote speciation.
    McPeek MA; Gavrilets S
    Evolution; 2006 Oct; 60(10):1967-80. PubMed ID: 17133854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Population genetic models of male and mutual mate choice.
    Servedio MR; Lande R
    Evolution; 2006 Apr; 60(4):674-85. PubMed ID: 16739450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The evolution of reproductive character displacement conflicts with how sexual selection operates within a species.
    Higgie M; Blows MW
    Evolution; 2008 May; 62(5):1192-203. PubMed ID: 18298640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gentlemen prefer blondes: the evolution of mate preference among strategically allocated males.
    Rowell JT; Servedio MR
    Am Nat; 2009 Jan; 173(1):12-25. PubMed ID: 19063659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Indirect mate choice, direct mate choice and species recognition in a bower-building cichlid fish lek.
    Genner MJ; Young KA; Haesler MP; Joyce DA
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Sep; 21(5):1387-96. PubMed ID: 18547351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gender differences in species recognition and the evolution of asymmetric sexual isolation.
    Svensson EI; Karlsson K; Friberg M; Eroukhmanoff F
    Curr Biol; 2007 Nov; 17(22):1943-7. PubMed ID: 17935996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sex differences in mate recognition and conspecific preference in species with mutual mate choice.
    Kozak GM; Reisland M; Boughmann JW
    Evolution; 2009 Feb; 63(2):353-65. PubMed ID: 19154359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can non-directional male mating preferences facilitate honest female ornamentation?
    Chenoweth SF; Doughty P; Kokko H
    Ecol Lett; 2006 Feb; 9(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 16958883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evolution of mate choice for genome-wide heterozygosity.
    Fromhage L; Kokko H; Reid JM
    Evolution; 2009 Mar; 63(3):684-94. PubMed ID: 19220455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sympatric speciation by sexual selection alone is unlikely.
    Arnegard ME; Kondrashov AS
    Evolution; 2004 Feb; 58(2):222-37. PubMed ID: 15068341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mate choice evolution, dominance effects, and the maintenance of genetic variation.
    Lehmann L; Keller LF; Kokko H
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Jan; 244(2):282-95. PubMed ID: 16979189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reinforcement of mate preference among hybridizing Heliconius butterflies.
    Kronforst MR; Young LG; Gilbert LE
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Jan; 20(1):278-85. PubMed ID: 17210020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A theoretical study on the evolution of male parental care and female multiple mating: effects of female mate choice and male care bias.
    Seki M; Wakano JY; Ihara Y
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Jul; 247(2):281-96. PubMed ID: 17448499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evolution of mate-choice imprinting: competing strategies.
    Tramm NA; Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2008 Aug; 62(8):1991-2003. PubMed ID: 18485111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Female mate-choice behavior and sympatric speciation.
    Verzijden MN; Lachlan RF; Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2005 Oct; 59(10):2097-108. PubMed ID: 16405155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adaptive plasticity in female mate choice dampens sexual selection on male ornaments in the lark bunting.
    Chaine AS; Lyon BE
    Science; 2008 Jan; 319(5862):459-62. PubMed ID: 18218896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Female mate-choice drives the evolution of male-biased dispersal in a social mammal.
    Höner OP; Wachter B; East ML; Streich WJ; Wilhelm K; Burke T; Hofer H
    Nature; 2007 Aug; 448(7155):798-801. PubMed ID: 17700698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reconciling sexual selection to species recognition: a process-based model of mating decision.
    Castellano S; Cermelli P
    J Theor Biol; 2006 Oct; 242(3):529-38. PubMed ID: 16712871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. No fecundity cost of female secondary sexual trait expression in the horned beetle Onthophagus sagittarius.
    Simmons LW; Emlen DJ
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Sep; 21(5):1227-35. PubMed ID: 18631210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 42.