212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17925077)
1. Effects of computerized decision support systems on nursing performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review.
Randell R; Mitchell N; Dowding D; Cullum N; Thompson C
J Health Serv Res Policy; 2007 Oct; 12(4):242-9. PubMed ID: 17925077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computerised decision support systems in order communication for diagnostic, screening or monitoring test ordering: systematic reviews of the effects and cost-effectiveness of systems.
Main C; Moxham T; Wyatt JC; Kay J; Anderson R; Stein K
Health Technol Assess; 2010 Oct; 14(48):1-227. PubMed ID: 21034668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review.
Garg AX; Adhikari NK; McDonald H; Rosas-Arellano MP; Devereaux PJ; Beyene J; Sam J; Haynes RB
JAMA; 2005 Mar; 293(10):1223-38. PubMed ID: 15755945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of pharmacy computerised clinical decision support on prescribing, clinical and patient outcomes: a systematic review of the literature.
Robertson J; Walkom E; Pearson SA; Hains I; Williamsone M; Newby D
Int J Pharm Pract; 2010 Apr; 18(2):69-87. PubMed ID: 20441116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of computerised clinical decision support systems (CDSS) on nursing and allied health professional performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review of experimental and observational studies.
Mebrahtu TF; Skyrme S; Randell R; Keenan AM; Bloor K; Yang H; Andre D; Ledward A; King H; Thompson C
BMJ Open; 2021 Dec; 11(12):e053886. PubMed ID: 34911719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computerized decision support systems in primary care for type 2 diabetes patients only improve patients' outcomes when combined with feedback on performance and case management: a systematic review.
Cleveringa FG; Gorter KJ; van den Donk M; van Gijsel J; Rutten GE
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2013 Feb; 15(2):180-92. PubMed ID: 23360424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A national survey of computerized decision support systems available to nurses in England.
Mitchell N; Randell R; Foster R; Dowding D; Lattimer V; Thompson C; Cullum N; Summers R
J Nurs Manag; 2009 Nov; 17(7):772-80. PubMed ID: 19793233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review.
Hunt DL; Haynes RB; Hanna SE; Smith K
JAMA; 1998 Oct; 280(15):1339-46. PubMed ID: 9794315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Registered nurses' use of computerised decision support in medication reviews.
Johansson-Pajala RM; Martin L; Jorsäter Blomgren K
Int J Health Care Qual Assur; 2018 Jul; 31(6):531-544. PubMed ID: 29954263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Do providers use computerized clinical decision support systems? A systematic review and meta-regression of clinical decision support uptake.
Kouri A; Yamada J; Lam Shin Cheung J; Van de Velde S; Gupta S
Implement Sci; 2022 Mar; 17(1):21. PubMed ID: 35272667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of a computerized decision support system on pressure ulcers and malnutrition in nursing homes for the elderly.
Fossum M; Alexander GL; Ehnfors M; Ehrenberg A
Int J Med Inform; 2011 Sep; 80(9):607-17. PubMed ID: 21783409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Review of computerized clinical decision support in community pharmacy.
Curtain C; Peterson GM
J Clin Pharm Ther; 2014 Aug; 39(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 24806361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A review of randomized controlled trials of medical record powered clinical decision support system to improve quality of diabetes care.
Ali SM; Giordano R; Lakhani S; Walker DM
Int J Med Inform; 2016 Mar; 87():91-100. PubMed ID: 26806716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects and characteristics of clinical decision support systems on the outcomes of patients with kidney disease: a systematic review.
Mirpanahi N; Nabovati E; Sharif R; Amirazodi S; Karami M
Hosp Pract (1995); 2023 Aug; 51(3):110-123. PubMed ID: 37068105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of electronic medical record-based clinical decision support on HIV care in resource-constrained settings: a systematic review.
Oluoch T; Santas X; Kwaro D; Were M; Biondich P; Bailey C; Abu-Hanna A; de Keizer N
Int J Med Inform; 2012 Oct; 81(10):e83-92. PubMed ID: 22921485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Exposure to and experiences with a computerized decision support intervention in primary care: results from a process evaluation.
Lugtenberg M; Pasveer D; van der Weijden T; Westert GP; Kool RB
BMC Fam Pract; 2015 Oct; 16():141. PubMed ID: 26474603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prescriber perceptions of medication-related computerized decision support systems in hospitals: A synthesis of qualitative research.
Van Dort BA; Zheng WY; Baysari MT
Int J Med Inform; 2019 Sep; 129():285-295. PubMed ID: 31445268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of clinical decision support systems for diabetes care: An overview of current evidence.
Jia P; Zhao P; Chen J; Zhang M
J Eval Clin Pract; 2019 Feb; 25(1):66-77. PubMed ID: 29947136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Medication related computerized decision support system (CDSS): make it a clinicians' partner!
Marcilly R; Leroy N; Luyckx M; Pelayo S; Riccioli C; Beuscart-Zéphir MC
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2011; 166():84-94. PubMed ID: 21685614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The use and effectiveness of electronic clinical decision support tools in the ambulatory/primary care setting: a systematic review of the literature.
Bryan C; Boren SA
Inform Prim Care; 2008; 16(2):79-91. PubMed ID: 18713524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
