These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17925240)

  • 41. A model for learning topographically organized parts-based representations of objects in visual cortex: topographic nonnegative matrix factorization.
    Hosoda K; Watanabe M; Wersing H; Körner E; Tsujino H; Tamura H; Fujita I
    Neural Comput; 2009 Sep; 21(9):2605-33. PubMed ID: 19548799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The effects of joint attention on object processing in 4- and 9-month-old infants.
    Cleveland A; Striano T
    Infant Behav Dev; 2007 Aug; 30(3):499-504. PubMed ID: 17610957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A tale of two recognition systems: implications of the fusiform face area and the visual word form area for lateralized object recognition models.
    Dien J
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan; 47(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 18805434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Visual attention during the preparation of bimanual movements.
    Baldauf D; Deubel H
    Vision Res; 2008 Feb; 48(4):549-63. PubMed ID: 18206205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Lateralized effects of categorical and coordinate spatial processing of component parts on the recognition of 3D non-nameable objects.
    Saneyoshi A; Michimata C
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Dec; 71(3):181-6. PubMed ID: 19800727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A quantitative theory of immediate visual recognition.
    Serre T; Kreiman G; Kouh M; Cadieu C; Knoblich U; Poggio T
    Prog Brain Res; 2007; 165():33-56. PubMed ID: 17925239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Invariant object recognition with trace learning and multiple stimuli present during training.
    Stringer SM; Rolls ET; Tromans JM
    Network; 2007 Jun; 18(2):161-87. PubMed ID: 17966074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A Bayesian model for efficient visual search and recognition.
    Elazary L; Itti L
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1338-52. PubMed ID: 20080120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Attention modulates initial stages of visual word processing.
    Ruz M; Nobre AC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Sep; 20(9):1727-36. PubMed ID: 18345981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Bilateral attentional advantage on elementary visual tasks.
    Reardon KM; Kelly JG; Matthews N
    Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(7):691-701. PubMed ID: 19200437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The effect of the inter-phase delay interval in the spontaneous object recognition test for pigs.
    Kornum BR; Thygesen KS; Nielsen TR; Knudsen GM; Lind NM
    Behav Brain Res; 2007 Aug; 181(2):210-7. PubMed ID: 17524499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Induced gamma-band activity elicited by visual representation of unattended objects.
    Martinovic J; Gruber T; Ohla K; Müller MM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jan; 21(1):42-57. PubMed ID: 18476754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Fixation and saliency during search of natural scenes: the case of visual agnosia.
    Foulsham T; Barton JJ; Kingstone A; Dewhurst R; Underwood G
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jul; 47(8-9):1994-2003. PubMed ID: 19428433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. What antipriming reveals about priming.
    Marsolek CJ
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2008 May; 12(5):176-81. PubMed ID: 18403251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The role of invariant line junctions in object and visual word recognition.
    Szwed M; Cohen L; Qiao E; Dehaene S
    Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(7):718-25. PubMed ID: 19200808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Real-time tracking of visually attended objects in virtual environments and its application to LOD.
    Lee S; Kim GJ; Choi S
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2009; 15(1):6-19. PubMed ID: 19008552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Combining feature- and correspondence-based methods for visual object recognition.
    Westphal G; Würtz RP
    Neural Comput; 2009 Jul; 21(7):1952-89. PubMed ID: 19292649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Untangling invariant object recognition.
    DiCarlo JJ; Cox DD
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2007 Aug; 11(8):333-41. PubMed ID: 17631409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Grouping of visual objects by honeybees.
    Zhang S; Srinivasan MV; Zhu H; Wong J
    J Exp Biol; 2004 Sep; 207(Pt 19):3289-98. PubMed ID: 15326205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Pooling and segmenting motion signals.
    Burr DC; Baldassi S; Morrone MC; Verghese P
    Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(10):1065-72. PubMed ID: 19027034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.