BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17925302)

  • 1. A modified sign test for comparing paired ROC curves.
    Braun TM; Alonzo TA
    Biostatistics; 2008 Apr; 9(2):364-72. PubMed ID: 17925302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A permutation test for comparing ROC curves in multireader studies a multi-reader ROC, permutation test.
    Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Apr; 13(4):414-20. PubMed ID: 16554220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A permutation test sensitive to differences in areas for comparing ROC curves from a paired design.
    Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Gur D
    Stat Med; 2005 Sep; 24(18):2873-93. PubMed ID: 16134144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tests of equivalence and non-inferiority for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired areas under ROC curves.
    Liu JP; Ma MC; Wu CY; Tai JY
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1219-38. PubMed ID: 16158400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A conditional nonparametric test for comparing two areas under the ROC curves from a paired design.
    Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Mar; 12(3):291-7. PubMed ID: 15766688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Incorporating utility-weights when comparing two diagnostic systems: a preliminary assessment.
    Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Oct; 12(10):1293-300. PubMed ID: 16179206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of correlated ROC areas in diagnostic testing.
    Song HH
    Biometrics; 1997 Mar; 53(1):370-82. PubMed ID: 9147602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the exact interval estimation for the difference in paired areas under the ROC curves.
    Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
    Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):224-42. PubMed ID: 17139702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three approaches to regression analysis of receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous test results.
    Pepe MS
    Biometrics; 1998 Mar; 54(1):124-35. PubMed ID: 9544511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A non-inferiority test for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired partial areas under ROC curves.
    Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(10):1762-76. PubMed ID: 17968858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Semiparametric empirical likelihood confidence intervals for the difference of areas under two correlated ROC curves under density ratio model.
    Zhang D; Zhang B
    Biom J; 2014 Jul; 56(4):678-96. PubMed ID: 24648388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A signed-rank test for clustered data.
    Datta S; Satten GA
    Biometrics; 2008 Jun; 64(2):501-7. PubMed ID: 17970820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An ROC-type measure of diagnostic accuracy when the gold standard is continuous-scale.
    Obuchowski NA
    Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(3):481-93. PubMed ID: 16287217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Power and sample size estimation for the Wilcoxon rank sum test with application to comparisons of C statistics from alternative prediction models.
    Rosner B; Glynn RJ
    Biometrics; 2009 Mar; 65(1):188-97. PubMed ID: 18510654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The partial area under the summary ROC curve.
    Walter SD
    Stat Med; 2005 Jul; 24(13):2025-40. PubMed ID: 15900606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sensitivity analysis for m-estimates, tests, and confidence intervals in matched observational studies.
    Rosenbaum PR
    Biometrics; 2007 Jun; 63(2):456-64. PubMed ID: 17688498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Wilcoxon-based group sequential designs for comparison of areas under two correlated ROC curves.
    Zhou XH; Li SM; Gatsonis CA
    Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):213-23. PubMed ID: 17357988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exact, distribution free confidence intervals for late effects in censored matched pairs.
    Daniel SR
    Biom J; 2009 Feb; 51(1):31-44. PubMed ID: 19219909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A general approach to sample size determination for prevalence surveys that use dual test protocols.
    Cheng D; Stamey JD; Branscum AJ
    Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(5):694-706. PubMed ID: 17722203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nonparametric estimation of ROC curves in the absence of a gold standard.
    Zhou XH; Castelluccio P; Zhou C
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):600-9. PubMed ID: 16011710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.