These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17925853)

  • 1. Implementing routine HIV testing: the role of state law.
    Wolf LE; Donoghoe A; Lane T
    PLoS One; 2007 Oct; 2(10):e1005. PubMed ID: 17925853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Consistency of state statutes with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention HIV testing recommendations for health care settings.
    Mahajan AP; Stemple L; Shapiro MF; King JB; Cunningham WE
    Ann Intern Med; 2009 Feb; 150(4):263-9. PubMed ID: 19221378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Legal and ethical implications of opt-out HIV testing.
    Hanssens C
    Clin Infect Dis; 2007 Dec; 45 Suppl 4():S232-9. PubMed ID: 18190292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Written informed-consent statutes and HIV testing.
    Ehrenkranz PD; Pagán JA; Begier EM; Linas BP; Madison K; Armstrong K
    Am J Prev Med; 2009 Jul; 37(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 19423271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patient and clinician ethical perspectives on the 2006 Centers for Disease Control and prevention HIV testing methods.
    Merchant RC; Waxman MJ; Maher JG; Clark MA; Celada MT; Liu T; Simmons EM; Beckwith CG; Mayer KH
    Public Health Rep; 2012; 127(3):318-29. PubMed ID: 22547863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The changing landscape of state legislation and expanded HIV testing.
    Brown J
    Public Health Rep; 2008; 123 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):16-20. PubMed ID: 19166087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Legal barriers to implementing recommendations for universal, routine prenatal HIV testing.
    Wolf LE; Lo B; Gostin LO
    J Law Med Ethics; 2004; 32(1):137-47. PubMed ID: 15152437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2006 human immunodeficiency virus testing recommendations and state testing laws.
    Neff S; Goldschmidt R
    JAMA; 2011 May; 305(17):1767-8. PubMed ID: 21540419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The implementation of the CDC's revised recommendations for HIV testing in medical settings: a Rhode Island update and call for action.
    Alexander NE; Alverson B; Neale R; Beckwith CG
    Med Health R I; 2009 Jul; 92(7):247-8. PubMed ID: 19685641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The CDC's routine HIV testing recommendation: legally, not so routine.
    Fisher AH; Hanssens C; Schulman DI
    HIV AIDS Policy Law Rev; 2006 Dec; 11(2-3):17-20. PubMed ID: 17373060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Updated CDC guidelines for HIV testing: a review for Wisconsin practitioners.
    Petroll AE; Galletly CL; Havens PL; Kwiecinski MF; Pinkerton SD
    WMJ; 2008 Apr; 107(2):84-90. PubMed ID: 18593083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Routine screening: informed consent, stigma and the waning of HIV exceptionalism.
    Wynia MK
    Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(4):5-8. PubMed ID: 16885092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Current HIV epidemiology and revised recommendations for HIV testing in health-care settings.
    Branson B
    J Med Virol; 2007; 79 Suppl 1():S6-10. PubMed ID: 17874432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Routine HIV screening in North Carolina in the era of the Affordable Care Act: update on laws, reimbursement, and tests.
    White BL; Carter YL; Records K; Martin IB
    South Med J; 2013 Nov; 106(11):637-41. PubMed ID: 24192596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidence and the Politics of Deimplementation: The Rise and Decline of the "Counseling and Testing" Paradigm for HIV Prevention at the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
    Johns DM; Bayer R; Fairchild AL
    Milbank Q; 2016 Mar; 94(1):126-62. PubMed ID: 26994712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Wisconsin statutes regarding HIV testing in primary care: frequent questions and answers.
    Vergeront JM; Reiser WJ; Druckenmiller JK; Krchnavek KA; Davis JP
    WMJ; 1998 Dec; 97(11):47-51. PubMed ID: 9894441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Costs and consequences of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's recommendations for opt-out HIV testing.
    Holtgrave DR
    PLoS Med; 2007 Jun; 4(6):e194. PubMed ID: 17564488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Barriers to routine HIV testing among Massachusetts community health center personnel.
    Mimiaga MJ; Johnson CV; Reisner SL; Vanderwarker R; Mayer KH
    Public Health Rep; 2011; 126(5):643-52. PubMed ID: 21886324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Testing public health ethics: why the CDC's HIV screening recommendations may violate the least infringement principle.
    Pierce MW; Maman S; Groves AK; King EJ; Wyckoff SC
    J Law Med Ethics; 2011; 39(2):263-71. PubMed ID: 21561521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The legality of unlinked anonymous screening for HIV infection: the U.S. approach.
    Wan L
    Health Policy; 1990; 14(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 10104534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.