These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17926296)

  • 1. Does competition between resources change the competition between their consumers to mutualism? Variations on two themes by Vandermeer.
    Abrams PA; Nakajima M
    Am Nat; 2007 Nov; 170(5):744-57. PubMed ID: 17926296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Coupled oscillations in food webs: balancing competition and mutualism in simple ecological models.
    Vandermeer J
    Am Nat; 2004 Jun; 163(6):857-67. PubMed ID: 15266383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Consumer effects on the vital rates of their resource can determine the outcome of competition between consumers.
    Lee CT; Miller TE; Inouye BD
    Am Nat; 2011 Oct; 178(4):452-63. PubMed ID: 21956024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intermediate-consumer identity and resources alter a food web with omnivory.
    Kneitel JM
    J Anim Ecol; 2007 Jul; 76(4):651-9. PubMed ID: 17584370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A graphical theory of competition on spatial resource gradients.
    Ryabov AB; Blasius B
    Ecol Lett; 2011 Mar; 14(3):220-8. PubMed ID: 21265973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Coexistence in MacArthur-style consumer-resource models.
    Haygood R
    Theor Popul Biol; 2002 Mar; 61(2):215-23. PubMed ID: 11969391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. High competition with low similarity and low competition with high similarity: exploitative and apparent competition in consumer-resource systems.
    Abrams PA
    Am Nat; 1998 Jul; 152(1):114-28. PubMed ID: 18811405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Competition-similarity relationships and the nonlinearity of competitive effects in consumer-resource systems.
    Abrams PA; Rueffler C; Dinnage R
    Am Nat; 2008 Oct; 172(4):463-74. PubMed ID: 18717636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Resource competition in stage-structured populations.
    Revilla TA
    J Theor Biol; 2000 May; 204(2):289-98. PubMed ID: 10887906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Niche saturation reveals resource partitioning among consumers.
    Northfield TD; Snyder GB; Ives AR; Snyder WE
    Ecol Lett; 2010 Mar; 13(3):338-48. PubMed ID: 20455919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Environmental fluctuations can stabilize food web dynamics by increasing synchrony.
    Vasseur DA; Fox JW
    Ecol Lett; 2007 Nov; 10(11):1066-74. PubMed ID: 17727665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Population dynamics of sexual and resource competition.
    Yoshimura J; Clark CW
    Theor Popul Biol; 1994 Apr; 45(2):121-31. PubMed ID: 8016751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adaptive feeding across environmental gradients and its effect on population dynamics.
    Richards SA; Wilson WG
    Theor Popul Biol; 2000 Jun; 57(4):377-90. PubMed ID: 10900190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Coexistence of cycling and dispersing consumer species: Armstrong and McGehee in space.
    Wilson WG; Abrams PA
    Am Nat; 2005 Feb; 165(2):193-205. PubMed ID: 15729650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biodiversity, habitat area, resource growth rate and interference competition.
    Kuang Y; Fagan WF; Loladze I
    Bull Math Biol; 2003 May; 65(3):497-518. PubMed ID: 12749536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The eco-evolutionary responses of a generalist consumer to resource competition.
    Abrams PA
    Evolution; 2012 Oct; 66(10):3130-43. PubMed ID: 23025603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of parental care and aggregation on population dynamics.
    Nakaoka S; Wang W; Takeuchi Y
    J Theor Biol; 2009 Sep; 260(1):161-71. PubMed ID: 19539631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can we predict indirect interactions from quantitative food webs?--an experimental approach.
    Tack AJ; Gripenberg S; Roslin T
    J Anim Ecol; 2011 Jan; 80(1):108-18. PubMed ID: 20796204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Single-species models for many-species food webs.
    Murdoch WW; Kendall BE; Nisbet RM; Briggs CJ; McCauley E; Bolser R
    Nature; 2002 May; 417(6888):541-3. PubMed ID: 12037520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ontogenetic diet shifts result in niche partitioning between two consumer species irrespective of competitive abilities.
    Schellekens T; de Roos AM; Persson L
    Am Nat; 2010 Nov; 176(5):625-37. PubMed ID: 20849269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.