These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17927311)

  • 41. Adaptive plasticity of loudness induced by chronic attenuation and enhancement of the acoustic background.
    Formby C; Sherlock LP; Gold SL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jul; 114(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 12880017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Changing-loudness aftereffect following simulated movement: implications for channel hypotheses concerning sound level change and movement.
    Reinhardt-Rutland AH
    J Gen Psychol; 1992 Apr; 119(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 1506843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Two auditory aftereffects and their dependency on carrier frequency.
    Reinhardt-Rutland AH
    Percept Psychophys; 1980 Dec; 28(6):569-71. PubMed ID: 7208272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Towards a method for loudness-based analysis of the sound of one's own voice.
    Yadav M; Cabrera D; Kenny DT
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2014 Oct; 39(3):117-25. PubMed ID: 23570449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The functional significance of auditory adaptation.
    Hood JD
    Br J Audiol; 1990 Jun; 24(3):151-4. PubMed ID: 2364185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Frequency selectivity in loudness adaptation and auditory fatigue.
    Charron S; Botte MC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Jan; 83(1):178-87. PubMed ID: 3343438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Hands help hearing: facilitatory audiotactile interaction at low sound-intensity levels.
    Schürmann M; Caetano G; Jousmäki V; Hari R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Feb; 115(2):830-2. PubMed ID: 15000194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Limit cycles, noise, and chaos in hearing.
    Stoop R; Vyver JJ; Kern A
    Microsc Res Tech; 2004 Apr; 63(6):400-12. PubMed ID: 15252881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The performance/intensity function: an underused resource.
    Boothroyd A
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):479-91. PubMed ID: 18469711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Acceptable range of speech level for both young and aged listeners in reverberant and quiet sound fields.
    Sato H; Sato H; Morimoto M; Ota R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1616. PubMed ID: 17927421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Effects of center frequency on binaural auditory filter bandwidth in the human brain.
    Soeta Y; Shimokura R; Nakagawa S
    Neuroreport; 2008 Nov; 19(17):1709-13. PubMed ID: 18841088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Loudness and auditory steady-state responses in normal-hearing subjects.
    Zenker Castro F; Barajas de Prat JJ; Larumbe Zabala E
    Int J Audiol; 2008 May; 47(5):269-75. PubMed ID: 18465411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Acceptance of noise with intelligible, reversed, and unfamiliar primary discourse.
    Gordon-Hickey S; Moore RE
    Am J Audiol; 2008 Dec; 17(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 18840706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The influence of onset sound level of test stimulus on reported magnitude of changing-loudness aftereffects.
    Reinhardt-Rutland AH
    J Gen Psychol; 1995 Jul; 122(3):295-303. PubMed ID: 7650523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Underwater localization of pure tones by harbor seals (Phoca vitulina).
    Bodson A; Miersch L; Dehnhardt G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2263-9. PubMed ID: 17902862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Acoustic orientation via sequential comparison in an ultrasonic moth.
    Greenfield MD; Tourtellot MK; Tillberg C; Bell WJ; Prins N
    Naturwissenschaften; 2002 Aug; 89(8):376-80. PubMed ID: 12435040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Response scatter in measuring changing-loudness aftereffects: evidence for simplified processing of auditory motion-in-depth and potential collision.
    Reinhardt-Rutland AH
    J Gen Psychol; 2007 Oct; 134(4):467-75. PubMed ID: 18183741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Subjective and objective evaluations of a scattered sound field in a scale model opera house.
    Ryu JK; Jeon JY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1538-49. PubMed ID: 19045645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Effect of air bubbles in the human external acoustic meatus on underwater sound perception].
    Lipatov NV
    Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR; 1985; 281(6):1497-9. PubMed ID: 4028931
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Sensitivity to interaural level difference and loudness growth with bilateral bimodal stimulation.
    Francart T; Brokx J; Wouters J
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(5):309-19. PubMed ID: 18391567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.