229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17927421)
1. Acceptable range of speech level for both young and aged listeners in reverberant and quiet sound fields.
Sato H; Sato H; Morimoto M; Ota R
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1616. PubMed ID: 17927421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Acceptable range of speech level in noisy sound fields for young adults and elderly persons.
Sato H; Morimoto M; Ota R
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1411-9. PubMed ID: 21895082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Subjective and objective effects of fast and slow compression on the perception of reverberant speech in listeners with hearing loss.
Shi LF; Doherty KA
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 51(5):1328-40. PubMed ID: 18664685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modeling speech intelligibility in quiet and noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
Rhebergen KS; Lyzenga J; Dreschler WA; Festen JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1570-83. PubMed ID: 20329857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners.
Rosengard PS; Payton KL; Braida LD
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16197282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Speech recognition and working memory capacity in young-elderly listeners: effects of hearing sensitivity.
Cervera TC; Soler MJ; Dasi C; Ruiz JC
Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Sep; 63(3):216-26. PubMed ID: 19739905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relationship between listening difficulty rating and objective measures in reverberant and noisy sound fields for young adults and elderly persons.
Sato H; Morimoto M; Wada M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jun; 131(6):4596-605. PubMed ID: 22712933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perceptual integration between target speech and target-speech reflection reduces masking for target-speech recognition in younger adults and older adults.
Huang Y; Huang Q; Chen X; Qu T; Wu X; Li L
Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 244(1-2):51-65. PubMed ID: 18694813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of presentation level on memory performance.
Heinrich A; Schneider BA
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):524-32. PubMed ID: 21278574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of white noise on the most comfortable level for speech with normal listeners.
Beattie RC; Zentil A; Svihovec DA
J Aud Res; 1982 Jan; 22(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 7187912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perceptual weighting of stop consonant cues by normal and impaired listeners in reverberation versus noise.
Hedrick MS; Younger MS
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):254-69. PubMed ID: 17463228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of aging on word intelligibility and listening difficulty in various reverberant fields.
Sato H; Sato H; Morimoto M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 May; 121(5 Pt1):2915-22. PubMed ID: 17550189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Loudness discomfort level for speech: comparison of two instructional sets for saturation sound pressure level selection.
Beattie RC; Svihovec DA; Carmen RE; Kunkel HA
Ear Hear; 1980; 1(4):197-205. PubMed ID: 7409356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of speech transmission in open public spaces affected by combined noises.
Lee PJ; Jeon JY
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):219-27. PubMed ID: 21786892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development and evaluation of the Mandarin speech signal content on the acceptable noise level test in listeners with normal hearing in mainland China.
Chen J; Zhang H; Plyler PN; Cao W; Chen J
Int J Audiol; 2011 Jun; 50(6):354-60. PubMed ID: 21599613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of room acoustics on the intelligibility of speech in classrooms for young children.
Yang W; Bradley JS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Feb; 125(2):922-33. PubMed ID: 19206869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Children's speech recognition scores: the Speech Intelligibility Index and proficiency factors for age and hearing level.
Scollie SD
Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):543-56. PubMed ID: 18469717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Speech intelligibility in background noise with ideal binary time-frequency masking.
Wang D; Kjems U; Pedersen MS; Boldt JB; Lunner T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Apr; 125(4):2336-47. PubMed ID: 19354408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perception of clear fricatives by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners.
Maniwa K; Jongman A; Wade T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1114-25. PubMed ID: 18247912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effects of speech presentation level on acceptance of noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
Freyaldenhoven MC; Plyler PN; Thelin JW; Hedrick MS
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):878-85. PubMed ID: 17675593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
