These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17927421)

  • 21. Benefits of audibility for listeners with severe high-frequency hearing loss.
    Simpson A; McDermott HJ; Dowell RC
    Hear Res; 2005 Dec; 210(1-2):42-52. PubMed ID: 16137848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Revisiting perceptual compensation for effects of reverberation in speech identification.
    Nielsen JB; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov; 128(5):3088-94. PubMed ID: 21110604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Tune in or tune out: age-related differences in listening to speech in music.
    Russo FA; Pichora-Fuller MK
    Ear Hear; 2008 Oct; 29(5):746-60. PubMed ID: 18596643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Contribution of consonant versus vowel information to sentence intelligibility for young normal-hearing and elderly hearing-impaired listeners.
    Kewley-Port D; Burkle TZ; Lee JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2365-75. PubMed ID: 17902871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of the desired sensation level [input/output] algorithm for adults with hearing loss: the acceptable range for amplified conversational speech.
    Jenstad LM; Bagatto MP; Seewald RC; Scollie SD; Cornelisse LE; Scicluna R
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):793-811. PubMed ID: 17982367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Elderly listeners with low intelligibility scores under reverberation show degraded subcortical representation of reverberant speech.
    Fujihira H; Shiraishi K; Remijn GB
    Neurosci Lett; 2017 Jan; 637():102-107. PubMed ID: 27884735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The combined effects of reverberation and nonstationary noise on sentence intelligibility.
    George EL; Festen JM; Houtgast T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):1269-77. PubMed ID: 18681613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Using listening difficulty ratings of conditions for speech communication in rooms.
    Sato H; Bradley JS; Morimoto M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Mar; 117(3 Pt 1):1157-67. PubMed ID: 15807005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Speech tests: application in individuals with noise induced hearing loss].
    Moreira RR; Ferreira Junior M
    Pro Fono; 2004; 16(3):293-300. PubMed ID: 15609584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An Evaluation of the BKB-SIN, HINT, QuickSIN, and WIN Materials on Listeners With Normal Hearing and Listeners With Hearing Loss.
    Wilson RH; McArdle RA; Smith SL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):844-56. PubMed ID: 17675590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Listener Factors Associated with Individual Susceptibility to Reverberation.
    Reinhart PN; Souza PE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Jan; 29(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 29309025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Perceptual consequences of changes in vocoded speech parameters in various reverberation conditions.
    Drgas S; Blaszak MA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Aug; 52(4):945-55. PubMed ID: 19380609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Contribution of high-frequency information to the acceptance of background noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Plyler PN; Madix SG; Thelin JW; Johnston KW
    Am J Audiol; 2007 Dec; 16(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 18056883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of the speaker gender on speech intelligibility in normal-hearing subjects with simulated high frequency hearing loss.
    Kiliç MA; Ogüt F
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2004; 125(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 15244027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Speech masking release in listeners with flat hearing loss: effects of masker fluctuation rate on identification scores and phonetic feature reception.
    Lorenzi C; Husson M; Ardoint M; Debruille X
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Sep; 45(9):487-95. PubMed ID: 17005491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Relations between frequency selectivity, temporal fine-structure processing, and speech reception in impaired hearing.
    Strelcyk O; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3328-45. PubMed ID: 19425674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Loudness and the acoustic reflex: normal-hearing listeners.
    Keith RW
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1979; 4(4):152-6. PubMed ID: 422427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of reverberation on acceptable noise level measurements in younger and older adults.
    Adams EM; Gordon-Hickey S; Moore RE; Morlas H
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Nov; 49(11):832-8. PubMed ID: 20936995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The benefit obtained from visually displayed text from an automatic speech recognizer during listening to speech presented in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):838-52. PubMed ID: 18633325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.