These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17927431)

  • 1. Speech segregation in rooms: effects of reverberation on both target and interferer.
    Lavandier M; Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1713. PubMed ID: 17927431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech segregation in rooms: monaural, binaural, and interacting effects of reverberation on target and interferer.
    Lavandier M; Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Apr; 123(4):2237-48. PubMed ID: 18397029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prediction of binaural speech intelligibility against noise in rooms.
    Lavandier M; Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jan; 127(1):387-99. PubMed ID: 20058985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Binaural prediction of speech intelligibility in reverberant rooms with multiple noise sources.
    Lavandier M; Jelfs S; Culling JF; Watkins AJ; Raimond AP; Makin SJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):218-31. PubMed ID: 22280586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Binaural speech intelligibility in rooms with variations in spatial location of sources and modulation depth of noise interferers.
    Collin B; Lavandier M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1146-59. PubMed ID: 23927114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prediction of the influence of reverberation on binaural speech intelligibility in noise and in quiet.
    Rennies J; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2999-3012. PubMed ID: 22087928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The benefit of binaural hearing in a cocktail party: effect of location and type of interferer.
    Hawley ML; Litovsky RY; Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Feb; 115(2):833-43. PubMed ID: 15000195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The spatial unmasking of speech: evidence for better-ear listening.
    Edmonds BA; Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Sep; 120(3):1539-45. PubMed ID: 17004475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transient auditory storage of acoustic details is associated with release of speech from informational masking in reverberant conditions.
    Huang Y; Huang Q; Chen X; Wu X; Li L
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1618-28. PubMed ID: 19803660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Understanding speech in noise after correction of congenital unilateral aural atresia: effects of age in the emergence of binaural squelch but not in use of head-shadow.
    Gray L; Kesser B; Cole E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 73(9):1281-7. PubMed ID: 19581007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Revision and validation of a binaural model for speech intelligibility in noise.
    Jelfs S; Culling JF; Lavandier M
    Hear Res; 2011 May; 275(1-2):96-104. PubMed ID: 21156201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intelligibility of reverberant noisy speech with ideal binary masking.
    Roman N; Woodruff J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2153-61. PubMed ID: 21973369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory target detection in reverberation.
    Zurek PM; Freyman RL; Balakrishnan U
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Apr; 115(4):1609-20. PubMed ID: 15101640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceptual integration between target speech and target-speech reflection reduces masking for target-speech recognition in younger adults and older adults.
    Huang Y; Huang Q; Chen X; Qu T; Wu X; Li L
    Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 244(1-2):51-65. PubMed ID: 18694813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech intelligibility in virtual restaurants.
    Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Oct; 140(4):2418. PubMed ID: 27794329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of room acoustics on the intelligibility of speech in classrooms for young children.
    Yang W; Bradley JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Feb; 125(2):922-33. PubMed ID: 19206869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Amplitude-modulation detection by gerbils in reverberant sound fields.
    Lingner A; Kugler K; Grothe B; Wiegrebe L
    Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 302():107-12. PubMed ID: 23603513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Voice segregation by difference in fundamental frequency: evidence for harmonic cancellation.
    Deroche ML; Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2855-65. PubMed ID: 22087914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of room acoustical parameters on speech reception thresholds and spatial release from masking.
    Biberger T; Ewert SD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Oct; 146(4):2188. PubMed ID: 31671969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.