These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17928093)

  • 1. Paternity analysis in Excel.
    Rocheta M; Dionísio FM; Fonseca L; Pires AM
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2007 Dec; 88(3):234-8. PubMed ID: 17928093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Spreadsheets of a conventional application software for calculation of plausibility of paternity: application to parentage testing with highly polymorphic markers in deceased party].
    Aoki Y; Hashiyada M; Morioka A; Nata M; Sagisaka K
    Nihon Hoigaku Zasshi; 1997 Jun; 51(3):196-204. PubMed ID: 9301224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assignment of paternity in a judicial dispute between two neighbor Holstein dairy farmers.
    Lirón JP; Ripoli MV; García PP; Giovambattista G
    J Forensic Sci; 2004 Jan; 49(1):96-8. PubMed ID: 14979351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [DNAStat, version 1.0--a software package for processing a genetic profile database and for biostatistical calculations].
    Berent J
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2006; 56(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 16708610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microsatellite DNA markers applied to detection of multiple paternity in Caiman latirostris in Santa Fe, Argentina.
    Amavet P; Rosso E; Markariani R; Piña CI
    J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol; 2008 Dec; 309(10):637-42. PubMed ID: 18777523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of X-linked short tandem repeats loci to confirm mutations in parentage caseworks.
    Chen DP; Tseng CP; Tsai SH; Wang MC; Lu SC; Wu TL; Chang PY; Sun CF
    Clin Chim Acta; 2009 Oct; 408(1-2):29-33. PubMed ID: 19595994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [DNAStat, version 1.2 -- a software package for processing genetic profile databases and biostatistical calculations].
    Berent J
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2007; 57(3):322-5. PubMed ID: 17907628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Parentage and relatedness in captive and natural populations of the Roseate Spoonbill (Aves: Ciconiiformes) based on microsatellite data.
    Miño CI; Sawyer GM; Benjamin RC; Del Lama SN
    J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol; 2009 Jul; 311(6):453-64. PubMed ID: 19424995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A case of multiple assignments (paternity/maternity) in an equine-out breeding system.
    Castagnasso EE; Kienast ME; García PP; Giovambattista G
    J Forensic Sci; 2007 Jul; 52(4):889-90. PubMed ID: 17524055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genetic maternity and paternity in a local population of armadillos assessed by microsatellite DNA markers and field data.
    Prodöhl PA; Loughry WJ; McDonough CM; Nelson WS; Thompson EA; Avise JC
    Am Nat; 1998 Jan; 151(1):7-19. PubMed ID: 18811420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An Excel macro for generating trilinear plots.
    Shikaze SG; Crowe AS
    Ground Water; 2007; 45(1):106-9. PubMed ID: 17257347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Kinship determination using DNA markers].
    Jorquera G H; Acuña P M; Cifuentes L L
    Rev Med Chil; 2008 Feb; 136(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 18483673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of software for calculating the likelihood ratio for parentage and kinship.
    Drábek J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Mar; 3(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 19215880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inferring unknown genotypes of sires at codominant deoxyribonucleic acid markers in half-sib families.
    Gomez-Raya L
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Jun; 87(6):1872-82. PubMed ID: 19251934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mutation rates at 14 STR loci in the population from Pernambuco, Northeast Brazil.
    de Andrade ES; Gomes AV; Raposo G; Mauricio-da-Silva L; Silva Rdos S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Sep; 3(4):e141-3. PubMed ID: 19647702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Resolving relationship tests that show ambiguous STR results using autosomal SNPs as supplementary markers.
    Phillips C; Fondevila M; García-Magariños M; Rodriguez A; Salas A; Carracedo A; Lareu MV
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Jun; 2(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 19083821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The value of DNA paternity identification in beef cattle: examples from Nevada's free-range ranches.
    Gomez-Raya L; Priest K; Rauw WM; Okomo-Adhiambo M; Thain D; Bruce B; Rink A; Torell R; Grellman L; Narayanan R; Beattie CW
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Jan; 86(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 17878273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On statistical analysis of forensic DNA: theory, methods and computer programs.
    Fung WK; Hu YQ; Chung YK
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Oct; 162(1-3):17-23. PubMed ID: 16870375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Probability of exclusion in paternity testing: time to reassess.
    Cifuentes LO; Martínez EH; Acuña MP; Jonquera HG
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Mar; 51(2):349-50. PubMed ID: 16566769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Verification of private paternity analysis at the Institutes of Legal Medicine in Greifswald, Jena, and Kiel].
    von Wurmb-Schwark N; Simeoni E; Poetsch M; Banaschak S; Mályusz V; Schwark T
    Arch Kriminol; 2008; 222(5-6):152-61. PubMed ID: 19216365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.