435 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17928126)
1. The usefulness of toxicogenomics for predicting acute skin irritation on in vitro reconstructed human epidermis.
Borlon C; Godard P; Eskes C; Hartung T; Zuang V; Toussaint O
Toxicology; 2007 Nov; 241(3):157-66. PubMed ID: 17928126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro skin irritation testing on reconstituted human epidermis: reproducibility for 50 chemicals tested with two protocols.
Tornier C; Rosdy M; Maibach HI
Toxicol In Vitro; 2006 Jun; 20(4):401-16. PubMed ID: 16229985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Irritant contact dermatitis. Part II. Evaluation evaluation of skin irritation potential of chemicals].
Chomiczewska D; Kieć-Swierczyńska M; Krecisz B
Med Pr; 2009; 60(3):209-14. PubMed ID: 19746889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development of an in vitro corrosion/irritation prediction assay using the EpiDerm skin model.
Kidd DA; Johnson M; Clements J
Toxicol In Vitro; 2007 Oct; 21(7):1292-7. PubMed ID: 17936572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. HSP27 as a biomarker for predicting skin irritation in human skin and reconstructed organotypic skin model.
Chen H; Li S; Meng T; Zhang L; Dai T; Xiang Q; Su Z; Zhang Q; Huang Y
Toxicol Lett; 2014 Apr; 226(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 24503015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A feasibility study developing an integrated testing strategy assessing skin irritation potential of chemicals.
Hoffmann S; Saliner AG; Patlewicz G; Eskes C; Zuang V; Worth AP
Toxicol Lett; 2008 Jul; 180(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 18585875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Leiden reconstructed human epidermal model as a tool for the evaluation of the skin corrosion and irritation potential according to the ECVAM guidelines.
El Ghalbzouri A; Siamari R; Willemze R; Ponec M
Toxicol In Vitro; 2008 Aug; 22(5):1311-20. PubMed ID: 18474418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro irritation models and immune reactions.
Gibbs S
Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2009; 22(2):103-13. PubMed ID: 19188758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vitro skin irritation: facts and future. State of the art review of mechanisms and models.
Welss T; Basketter DA; Schröder KR
Toxicol In Vitro; 2004 Jun; 18(3):231-43. PubMed ID: 15046769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A catch-up validation study of an in vitro skin irritation test method using reconstructed human epidermis LabCyte EPI-MODEL24.
Kojima H; Katoh M; Shinoda S; Hagiwara S; Suzuki T; Izumi R; Yamaguchi Y; Nakamura M; Kasahawa T; Shibai A
J Appl Toxicol; 2014 Jul; 34(7):766-74. PubMed ID: 24122860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improved procedures for in vitro skin irritation testing of sticky and greasy natural botanicals.
Molinari J; Eskes C; Andres E; Remoué N; Sá-Rocha VM; Hurtado SP; Barrichello C
Toxicol In Vitro; 2013 Feb; 27(1):441-50. PubMed ID: 22906570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Determination of skin irritation potential in the human 4-h patch test.
Basketter DA; York M; McFadden JP; Robinson MK
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Jul; 51(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 15291823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A catch-up validation study on reconstructed human epidermis (SkinEthic RHE) for full replacement of the Draize skin irritation test.
Alépée N; Tornier C; Robert C; Amsellem C; Roux MH; Doucet O; Pachot J; Méloni M; de Brugerolle de Fraissinette A
Toxicol In Vitro; 2010 Feb; 24(1):257-66. PubMed ID: 19733228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of a sensitive test method to evaluate mechanical irritation potential on mucosal skin.
Farage MA; Meyer S; Walter D
Skin Res Technol; 2004 May; 10(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 15059175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of human epidermal model LabCyte EPI-MODEL for in vitro skin irritation testing according to European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM)-validated protocol.
Katoh M; Hamajima F; Ogasawara T; Hata K
J Toxicol Sci; 2009 Jun; 34(3):327-34. PubMed ID: 19483386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The human epidermis models EpiSkin, SkinEthic and EpiDerm: an evaluation of morphology and their suitability for testing phototoxicity, irritancy, corrosivity, and substance transport.
Netzlaff F; Lehr CM; Wertz PW; Schaefer UF
Eur J Pharm Biopharm; 2005 Jul; 60(2):167-78. PubMed ID: 15913972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimisation of the EpiDerm test protocol for the upcoming ECVAM validation study on in vitro skin irritation tests.
Kandárová H; Liebsch M; Genschow E; Gerner I; Traue D; Slawik B; Spielmann H
ALTEX; 2004; 21(3):107-14. PubMed ID: 15329774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Identification of potential biomarkers for predicting acute dermal irritation by proteomic analysis.
Zhang Q; Dai T; Zhang L; Zhang M; Xiao X; Hu H; Zou P; Liu X; Xiang Q; Su Z; Huang Y; He QY
J Appl Toxicol; 2011 Nov; 31(8):762-72. PubMed ID: 21469165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genes specifically modulated in sensitized skins allow the detection of sensitizers in a reconstructed human skin model. Development of the SENS-IS assay.
Cottrez F; Boitel E; Auriault C; Aeby P; Groux H
Toxicol In Vitro; 2015 Jun; 29(4):787-802. PubMed ID: 25724174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of contact allergens by dissociation of irritant and sensitizing properties.
Jacobs JJ; Lehé CL; Cammans KD; Das PK; Elliott GR
Toxicol In Vitro; 2004 Oct; 18(5):681-90. PubMed ID: 15251187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
