BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17928727)

  • 1. Preparation time and sealing effect of cavities prepared by an ultrasonic device and a high-speed diamond rotary cutting system.
    Vieira AS; dos Santos MP; Antunes LA; Primo LG; Maia LC
    J Oral Sci; 2007 Sep; 49(3):207-11. PubMed ID: 17928727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Er,Cr:YSGG Laser Handpieces for Class II Preparation and Microleakage of Silorane- or Methacrylate-Based Composite Restorations.
    Ergin E; Oz FD; Gurgan S
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2018 Sep; 36(9):499-505. PubMed ID: 30188252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microleakage of composite resin restorations in cervical cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser radiation.
    Shahabi S; Ebrahimpour L; Walsh LJ
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Jun; 53(2):172-5. PubMed ID: 18494974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Setien VJ; Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microleakage of glass ionomer restoration in cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation in primary teeth.
    Rossi RR; Aranha AC; Eduardo Cde P; Ferreira LS; Navarro RS; Zezell DM
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 18647510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of Erbium:YAG laser energies on the microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Roebuck EM; Saunders WP; Whitters CJ
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):280-4. PubMed ID: 11764116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Microleakage of resin-based composite restorations with ceramic inserts.
    Kuramoto M; Matos AB; Matson E; Eduardo CP; Powers JM
    Am J Dent; 2000 Dec; 13(6):311-4. PubMed ID: 11764125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Chlorhexidine's effect on sealing ability of composite restorations following Er:YAG laser cavity preparation.
    Geraldo-Martins VR; Robles FR; Matos AB
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jul; 8(5):26-33. PubMed ID: 17618327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of pre-heating resin composite on restoration microleakage.
    Wagner WC; Aksu MN; Neme AM; Linger JB; Pink FE; Walker S
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 18335736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microleakage of compomer restorations in primary teeth after preparation with bur or air abrasion.
    Aysegül O; Nurhan O; Haluk B; Dilek T
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 15853100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of marginal microleakage of flowable composite restorations in primary molars prepared by high-speed carbide bur, Er:YAG laser, and air abrasion.
    Borsatto MC; Corona SA; Chinelatti MA; Ramos RP; de Sá Rocha RA; Pecora JD; Palma-Dibb RG
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2006; 73(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 16948375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of microleakage of different margin types around Class V resin restorations in primary teeth.
    Lopes Coutinho TC; Almeida Tostes M
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Sep; 14(3):246-51. PubMed ID: 24295013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Leakage pathway of Class V cavities restored with different flowable resin composite restorations.
    Awliya WY; El-Sahn AM
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 18335730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microleakage study of different adhesive systems in Class V cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser and bur preparation.
    Ergucu Z; Celik EU; Turkun M
    Gen Dent; 2007; 55(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17333962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of a carbomer/fluoroapatite-enhanced glass-ionomer cement on primary teeth restorations.
    Tolidis K; Boutsiouki C; Gerasimou P
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 17(3):227-233. PubMed ID: 27759413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of different preparation and etching procedures on the microleakage of direct composite veneer restorations.
    Gorucu J; Gurgan S; Cakir FY; Bicer CO; Gorucu H
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2011 Mar; 29(3):205-11. PubMed ID: 21054199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Newer Class I cavity preparation for permanent teeth using air abrasion and composite restoration.
    Ferdianakis K; White GE
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(3):201-16. PubMed ID: 10686867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ultrasonic versus high-speed cavity preparation: analysis of increases in pulpal temperature and time to complete preparation.
    Vanderlei AD; Borges AL; Cavalcanti BN; Rode SM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Aug; 100(2):107-9. PubMed ID: 18672127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microleakage of posterior composite restorations lined with self-adhesive resin cements.
    Al-Saleh M; El-Mowafy O; Tam L; Fenton A
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(5):556-63. PubMed ID: 20945747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of cavity dimensions, insertion technique and adhesive system on microleakage of Class V restorations.
    Costa Pfeifer CS; Braga RR; Cardoso PE
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2006 Feb; 137(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 16521386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.