These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
53 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1792873)
1. Design of Kinemax total knee replacement. Bearing surfaces. Walker S Acta Orthop Belg; 1991; 57 Suppl 2():108-13. PubMed ID: 1792873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tibiofemoral contact stress after total knee arthroplasty: comparison of fixed and mobile-bearing inlay designs. Stukenborg-Colsman C; Ostermeier S; Hurschler C; Wirth CJ Acta Orthop Scand; 2002 Dec; 73(6):638-46. PubMed ID: 12553510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of design, materials and kinematics on the in vitro wear of total knee replacements. McEwen HM; Barnett PI; Bell CJ; Farrar R; Auger DD; Stone MH; Fisher J J Biomech; 2005 Feb; 38(2):357-65. PubMed ID: 15598464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term results of low contact stress mobile-bearing total knee replacements. Huang CH; Ma HM; Lee YM; Ho FY Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Nov; (416):265-70. PubMed ID: 14646769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimization of the geometry of total knee implant in the sagittal plane using FEA. Dargahi J; Najarian S; Amiri S Biomed Mater Eng; 2003; 13(4):439-49. PubMed ID: 14646058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Low friction total knee arthroplasty with the alumina ceramic condylar prosthesis. Yasuda K; Miyagi N; Kaneda K Bull Hosp Jt Dis; 1993; 53(2):15-21. PubMed ID: 8012253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Kinematics of three variations of the Freeman-Samuelson total knee prosthesis. Saari T; Uvehammer J; Carlsson LV; Herberts P; Regnér L; Kärrholm J Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 May; (410):235-47. PubMed ID: 12771835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Laxity and functional results of Miller-Galante total knee prosthesis with posterior cruciate ligament sparing after a 6-year follow-up]. Besson A; Brazier J; Chantelot C; Migaud H; Gougeon F; Duquennoy A Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1999 Dec; 85(8):797-802. PubMed ID: 10637880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differences in patellar tracking and knee kinematics among three different total knee designs. Chew JT; Stewart NJ; Hanssen AD; Luo ZP; Rand JA; An KN Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1997 Dec; (345):87-98. PubMed ID: 9418625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of femoral component position on the kinematics of total knee arthroplasty. Rhoads DD; Noble PC; Reuben JD; Tullos HS Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1993 Jan; (286):122-9. PubMed ID: 8425333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The kinematics of fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. Most E; Li G; Schule S; Sultan P; Park SE; Zayontz S; Rubash HE Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Nov; (416):197-207. PubMed ID: 14646762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Total knee arthroplasty with the Beznoska S.V.L. implant: short-term results]. Stárek M; Stehlík J; Held M Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2004; 71(6):352-9. PubMed ID: 15686636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An experimental model of tibial counterface polyethylene wear in mobile bearing knees: the influence of design and kinematics. Jones VC; Barton DC; Fitzpatrick DP; Auger DD; Stone MH; Fisher J Biomed Mater Eng; 1999; 9(3):189-96. PubMed ID: 10572623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Total knee arthroplasty with bicruciate preservation: Comparison versus the same posterostabilized design at eight years follow-up]. Goutallier D; Manicom O; Van Driessche S Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Oct; 94(6):585-95. PubMed ID: 18929754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vivo kinematic analysis of a high-flexion posterior stabilized fixed-bearing knee prosthesis in deep knee-bending motion. Tamaki M; Tomita T; Yamazaki T; Hozack WJ; Yoshikawa H; Sugamoto K J Arthroplasty; 2008 Sep; 23(6):879-85. PubMed ID: 18555651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: design factors in minimizing wear. Dennis DA; Komistek RD Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Nov; 452():70-7. PubMed ID: 16924175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors affecting the impingement angle of fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee replacements: a laboratory study. Walker PS; Yildirim G; Sussman-Fort J; Roth J; White B; Klein GR J Arthroplasty; 2007 Aug; 22(5):745-52. PubMed ID: 17689786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differences in patellofemoral contact stresses between mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasties: a dynamic in vitro measurement. Skwara A; Tibesku CO; Ostermeier S; Stukenborg-Colsman C; Fuchs-Winkelmann S Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 Jul; 129(7):901-7. PubMed ID: 18825394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of femoral component rotation and patellar design on patellar forces. Singerman R; Pagan HD; Peyser AB; Goldberg VM Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1997 Jan; (334):345-53. PubMed ID: 9005932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Medium-term results of a mobile bearing total knee replacement. Kaper BP; Smith PN; Bourne RB; Rorabeck CH; Robertson D Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 Oct; (367):201-9. PubMed ID: 10546616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]