146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17929196)
1. Can infants have interests in continued life?
Kaposy C
Theor Med Bioeth; 2007; 28(4):301-30. PubMed ID: 17929196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pro-Life Arguments Against Infanticide and Why they are Not Convincing.
Räsänen J
Bioethics; 2016 Nov; 30(9):656-662. PubMed ID: 27717058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Discussing infanticide.
Singer P
J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):260. PubMed ID: 23637423
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Abortion, infanticide and moral context.
Porter L
J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):350-2. PubMed ID: 23637451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What exactly did you claim?
Häyry M
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2015 Jan; 24(1):107-12. PubMed ID: 25473863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Of course the baby should live: against 'after-birth abortion'.
Rini RA
J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):353-6. PubMed ID: 23637452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Limitations on personhood arguments for abortion and 'after-birth abortion'.
Wrigley A
J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):e15-8. PubMed ID: 23637455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Critical notice--defending life: a moral and legal case against abortion choice by Francis J Beckwith.
Stretton D
J Med Ethics; 2008 Nov; 34(11):793-7. PubMed ID: 18974412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Personhood, harm and interest: a reply to Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva.
Beard M; Lynch S
J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):e1-4. PubMed ID: 23637453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Beyond Infanticide: How Psychological Accounts of Persons Can Justify Harming Infants.
Rodger D; Blackshaw BP; Miller C
New Bioeth; 2018 Jul; 24(2):106-121. PubMed ID: 29464993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Concern for our vulnerable prenatal and neonatal children: a brief reply to Giubilini and Minerva.
Camosy C
J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):296-8. PubMed ID: 23637431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Why pro-life arguments still are not convincing: A reply to my critics.
Räsänen J
Bioethics; 2018 Nov; 32(9):628-633. PubMed ID: 30168863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. If Abortion, then Infanticide.
Hershenov DB; Hershenov RJ
Theor Med Bioeth; 2017 Oct; 38(5):387-409. PubMed ID: 28766249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Yes, the baby should live: a pro-choice response to Giubilini and Minerva.
Manninen BA
J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):330-5. PubMed ID: 23637447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The common premise for uncommon conclusions.
Coady CA
J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):284-8. PubMed ID: 23637428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The moral significance of being born.
Levy N
J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):326-9. PubMed ID: 23637446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Philosophy, critical thinking and 'after-birth abortion: why should the baby live?'.
Tooley M
J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):266-72. PubMed ID: 23637425
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Toward an ethic of ambiguity.
Arras JD
Hastings Cent Rep; 1984 Apr; 14(2):25-33. PubMed ID: 6724882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is the pro-choice position for infanticide 'madness'?
Camosy C
J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):301-2. PubMed ID: 23637433
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. After-birth abortion.
Selgelid MJ
Monash Bioeth Rev; 2012 Mar; 30(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 22924237
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
