These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17929256)

  • 1. Analysis of patients with false negative mammography and symptomatic breast carcinoma.
    Murphy IG; Dillon MF; Doherty AO; McDermott EW; Kelly G; O'Higgins N; Hill AD
    J Surg Oncol; 2007 Nov; 96(6):457-63. PubMed ID: 17929256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How reassuring is a normal breast ultrasound in assessment of a screen-detected mammographic abnormality? A review of interval cancers after assessment that included ultrasound evaluation.
    Bennett ML; Welman CJ; Celliers LM
    Clin Radiol; 2011 Oct; 66(10):928-39. PubMed ID: 21718976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: mammographic findings and extent of disease at diagnosis in 184 patients.
    Krecke KN; Gisvold JJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Nov; 161(5):957-60. PubMed ID: 8273634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Breast carcinoma diagnosed in mammographic screening incidentally. Research on the radiologic signs in prior mammograms].
    Marra V; Frigerio A; Di Virgilio MR; Menna S; Burke P
    Radiol Med; 1999 Nov; 98(5):342-6. PubMed ID: 10780212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Screening mammography interpretation test: more frequent mistakes.
    Gozzi G; Martinoli C; Conti GM; Ganzetti A; Bodini M; Fiorentino C; Marini UP; Santini D; Bacigalupo L
    Radiol Med; 2005 Mar; 109(3):268-79. PubMed ID: 15775896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Negative mammograms in symptomatic patients with breast cancer.
    Patel MR; Whitman GJ
    Acad Radiol; 1998 Jan; 5(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 9442204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minority report - false negative breast assessment in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography: imaging and pathological features, and associated delay in diagnosis.
    Ciatto S; Houssami N; Ambrogetti D; Bonardi R; Collini G; Del Turco MR
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Sep; 105(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 17115112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The visibility of cancer on previous mammograms in retrospective review.
    Saarenmaa I; Salminen T; Geiger U; Heikkinen P; Hyvärinen S; Isola J; Kataja V; Kokko ML; Kokko R; Kumpulainen E; Kärkkäinen A; Pakkanen J; Peltonen P; Piironen A; Salo A; Talviala ML; Hakama M
    Clin Radiol; 2001 Jan; 56(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 11162696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. False-negative core needle biopsies of the breast: an analysis of clinical, radiologic, and pathologic findings in 27 concecutive cases of missed breast cancer.
    Shah VI; Raju U; Chitale D; Deshpande V; Gregory N; Strand V
    Cancer; 2003 Apr; 97(8):1824-31. PubMed ID: 12673707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. False-negative mammograms in patients with breast cancer.
    Niloff PH; Sheiner NM
    Can J Surg; 1981 Jan; 24(1):50, 52. PubMed ID: 7459735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms.
    Yang SK; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Cha JH; Kim SM; Kim SJ; Im JG
    Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 17507722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can computer-aided detection with double reading of screening mammograms help decrease the false-negative rate? Initial experience.
    Destounis SV; DiNitto P; Logan-Young W; Bonaccio E; Zuley ML; Willison KM
    Radiology; 2004 Aug; 232(2):578-84. PubMed ID: 15229350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Mammography and mammary ultrasonography: which examination sequence is preferable?].
    Müller-Schimpfle M; Stern W; Stoll P; Kaiser JW; Claussen CD
    Rofo; 1997 Oct; 167(4):348-54. PubMed ID: 9417262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Previous mammograms in patients with impalpable breast carcinoma: retrospective vs blinded interpretation. 1993 ARRS President's Award.
    Harvey JA; Fajardo LL; Innis CA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Dec; 161(6):1167-72. PubMed ID: 8249720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. False negative mammograms causing delay in breast cancer diagnosis.
    Burns PE; Grace MG; Lees AW; May C
    J Can Assoc Radiol; 1979 Jun; 30(2):74-6. PubMed ID: 457739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sclerosing lobular hyperplasia of the breast: imaging features in 15 cases.
    Poulton TB; de Paredes ES; Baldwin M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):291-4. PubMed ID: 7618542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with ipsilateral breast carcinoma: the role of mammography.
    Muttarak M; Pojchamarnwiputh S; Padungchaichote W; Chaiwun B
    Singapore Med J; 2002 May; 43(5):229-33. PubMed ID: 12188073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Palpable breast thickening: role of mammography and US in cancer detection.
    Kaiser JS; Helvie MA; Blacklaw RL; Roubidoux MA
    Radiology; 2002 Jun; 223(3):839-44. PubMed ID: 12034957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Outcome of men presenting with clinical breast problems: the role of mammography and ultrasound.
    Patterson SK; Helvie MA; Aziz K; Nees AV
    Breast J; 2006; 12(5):418-23. PubMed ID: 16958958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The evaluation of false negative mammography from malignant and benign breast lesions.
    Wang J; Shih TT; Hsu JC; Li YW
    Clin Imaging; 2000; 24(2):96-103. PubMed ID: 11124482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.