These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17929256)

  • 21. [Diagnostic errors in mammography. I. False negative results].
    Morrone D; Ambrogetti D; Bravetti P; Catarzi S; Ciatto S; Rosselli del Turco M
    Radiol Med; 1991 Sep; 82(3):212-7. PubMed ID: 1947253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations.
    Elmore JG; Barton MB; Moceri VM; Polk S; Arena PJ; Fletcher SW
    N Engl J Med; 1998 Apr; 338(16):1089-96. PubMed ID: 9545356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The role of MRI in invasive lobular carcinoma.
    Boetes C; Veltman J; van Die L; Bult P; Wobbes T; Barentsz JO
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2004 Jul; 86(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 15218359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. False-negative breast screening assessment: what lessons can we learn?
    Burrell HC; Evans AJ; Wilson AR; Pinder SE
    Clin Radiol; 2001 May; 56(5):385-8. PubMed ID: 11384136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Second round cancers: how many were visible on the first round of the UK National Breast Screening Programme, three years earlier?
    Daly CA; Apthorp L; Field S
    Clin Radiol; 1998 Jan; 53(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 9464431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Diagnosis of breast cancer: contribution of US as an adjunct to mammography.
    Zonderland HM; Coerkamp EG; Hermans J; van de Vijver MJ; van Voorthuisen AE
    Radiology; 1999 Nov; 213(2):413-22. PubMed ID: 10551221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of age and breast density on screening mammograms with false-positive findings.
    Lehman CD; White E; Peacock S; Drucker MJ; Urban N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Dec; 173(6):1651-5. PubMed ID: 10584815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Surgical decision making and factors determining a diagnosis of breast carcinoma in women presenting with nipple discharge.
    Cabioglu N; Hunt KK; Singletary SE; Stephens TW; Marcy S; Meric F; Ross MI; Babiera GV; Ames FC; Kuerer HM
    J Am Coll Surg; 2003 Mar; 196(3):354-64. PubMed ID: 12648684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Mammography in hospital patients: use and misuse.
    Woods WG; Earlam RJ; Turner MJ
    J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1992 Feb; 37(1):16-8. PubMed ID: 1573600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Breast cancers in women 35 years of age and younger: mammographic findings.
    Shaw de Paredes E; Marsteller LP; Eden BV
    Radiology; 1990 Oct; 177(1):117-9. PubMed ID: 2399309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Impact of menstrual phase on false-negative mammograms in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study.
    Baines CJ; Vidmar M; McKeown-Eyssen G; Tibshirani R
    Cancer; 1997 Aug; 80(4):720-4. PubMed ID: 9264355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Use of previous screening mammograms to identify features indicating cases that would have a possible gain in prognosis following earlier detection.
    Broeders MJ; Onland-Moret NC; Rijken HJ; Hendriks JH; Verbeek AL; Holland R
    Eur J Cancer; 2003 Aug; 39(12):1770-5. PubMed ID: 12888373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reassessment of breast cancers missed during routine screening mammography: a community-based study.
    Yankaskas BC; Schell MJ; Bird RE; Desrochers DA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Sep; 177(3):535-41. PubMed ID: 11517043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 mammograms and the use of stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in a nonacademic community practice.
    Mendez A; Cabanillas F; Echenique M; Malekshamran K; Perez I; Ramos E
    Cancer; 2004 Feb; 100(4):710-4. PubMed ID: 14770425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Follow-up of breast lesions diagnosed as benign with stereotactic core-needle biopsy: frequency of mammographic change and false-negative rate.
    Lee CH; Philpotts LE; Horvath LJ; Tocino I
    Radiology; 1999 Jul; 212(1):189-94. PubMed ID: 10405741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Analysis of 172 subtle findings on prior normal mammograms in women with breast cancer detected at follow-up screening.
    Ikeda DM; Birdwell RL; O'Shaughnessy KF; Brenner RJ; Sickles EA
    Radiology; 2003 Feb; 226(2):494-503. PubMed ID: 12563145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Preoperative assessment of breast cancer: sonography versus MR imaging.
    Hlawatsch A; Teifke A; Schmidt M; Thelen M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Dec; 179(6):1493-501. PubMed ID: 12438043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Breast cancers invisible on mammography.
    Foxcroft LM; Evans EB; Joshua HK; Hirst C
    Aust N Z J Surg; 2000 Mar; 70(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 10765896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Physician predictors of mammographic accuracy.
    Smith-Bindman R; Chu P; Miglioretti DL; Quale C; Rosenberg RD; Cutter G; Geller B; Bacchetti P; Sickles EA; Kerlikowske K
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Mar; 97(5):358-67. PubMed ID: 15741572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Architectural Distortion on Mammography: Correlation With Pathologic Outcomes and Predictors of Malignancy.
    Bahl M; Baker JA; Kinsey EN; Ghate SV
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Dec; 205(6):1339-45. PubMed ID: 26587943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.