BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17929265)

  • 1. Electromagnetic field measurements using personal exposimeters.
    Knafl U; Lehmann H; Riederer M
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2008 Feb; 29(2):160-2. PubMed ID: 17929265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Potential exposure assessment errors associated with body-worn RF dosimeters.
    Blas J; Lago FA; Fernández P; Lorenzo RM; Abril EJ
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2007 Oct; 28(7):573-6. PubMed ID: 17654534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement of electric fields induced in a human subject due to natural movements in static magnetic fields or exposure to alternating magnetic field gradients.
    Glover PM; Bowtell R
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jan; 53(2):361-73. PubMed ID: 18184992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of occupational exposure to radiofrequency fields and radiation.
    Cooper TG; Allen SG; Blackwell RP; Litchfield I; Mann SM; Pope JM; van Tongeren MJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(2):191-203. PubMed ID: 15266067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measurement of electromagnetic fields generated by air traffic control radar systems with spectrum analysers.
    Barellini A; Bogi L; Licitra G; Silvi AM; Zari A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Dec; 137(3-4):210-3. PubMed ID: 19864331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of critical situations in the evaluation of human exposure to magnetic fields with complex waveforms.
    Crotti G; Giordano D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Dec; 137(3-4):227-30. PubMed ID: 19854853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Workplace characterisation in case of rail transport of radioactive materials.
    Donadille L; Itié C; Lahaye T; Muller H; Trompier F; Bottollier-Depois JF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):369-75. PubMed ID: 17189278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. E-field assessment errors associated with RF dosemeters for different angles of arrival.
    Bahillo A; Blas J; Fernández P; Lorenzo RM; Mazuelas S; Abril EJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 132(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 18927131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Demodulation in tissue, the relevant parameters and the implications for limiting exposure.
    Silny J
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):604-8. PubMed ID: 17495662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Requirements for reliable worst-case assessment of human exposure to RF electromagnetic fields with known uncertainty.
    Christ A
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):554-64. PubMed ID: 17495656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exposure assessment procedures in presence of wideband digital wireless networks.
    Trinchero D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Dec; 137(3-4):236-42. PubMed ID: 19914966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Considerations concerning the use of counting active personal dosimeters in pulsed fields of ionising radiation.
    Ambrosi P; Borowski M; Iwatschenko M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Jun; 139(4):483-93. PubMed ID: 20083488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measurement and simulation of lineal energy distribution at the CERN high energy facility with a tissue equivalent proportional counter.
    Rollet S; Autischer M; Beck P; Latocha M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):425-8. PubMed ID: 17277327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rapporteur Report: ICNIRP international workshop on EMF dosimetry and biophysical aspects relevant to setting exposure guidelines.
    Roy CR
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):658-67. PubMed ID: 17495669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Application of a wrist dosimeter prototype for radiation monitoring ((153)Sm) during a therapeutic procedure simulation.
    Cecatti SG; Guimarães MI; Caldas LV
    J Radiol Prot; 2009 Dec; 29(4):519-25. PubMed ID: 19923645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Static fields: biological effects and mechanisms relevant to exposure limits.
    van Rongen E; Saunders RD; van Deventer ET; Repacholi MH
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):584-90. PubMed ID: 17495659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Direction distributions of neutrons and reference values of the personal dose equivalent in workplace fields.
    Luszik-Bhadra M; Bolognese-Milsztajn T; Boschung M; Coeck M; Curzio G; d'Errico F; Fiechtner A; Lacoste V; Lindborg L; Reginatto M; Schuhmacher H; Tanner R; Vanhavere F
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):364-8. PubMed ID: 17369265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Numerical dosimetry ELF: accuracy of the method, variability of models and parameters, and the implication for quantifying guidelines.
    Bahr A; Bolz T; Hennes C
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):521-30. PubMed ID: 17495652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Summary of personal neutron dosemeter results obtained within the EVIDOS project.
    Luszik-Bhadra M; Bolognese-Milsztajn T; Boschung M; Coeck M; Curzio G; Derdau D; d'Errico F; Fiechtner A; Kyllönen JE; Lacoste V; Lievens B; Lindborg L; Lovefors Daun A; Reginatto M; Schuhmacher H; Tanner R; Vanhavere F
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):293-9. PubMed ID: 17449908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accounting for human variability and sensitivity in setting standards for electromagnetic fields.
    Bailey WH; Erdreich LS
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):649-57. PubMed ID: 17495668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.