900 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17929517)
1. The effect of thermal cycling and air abrasion on cement failure loads of 4 provisional luting agents used for the cementation of implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
Michalakis K; Pissiotis AL; Kang K; Hirayama H; Garefis PD; Petridis H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):569-74. PubMed ID: 17929517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cement failure loads of 4 provisional luting agents used for the cementation of implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
Michalakis KX; Pissiotis AL; Hirayama H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(4):545-9. PubMed ID: 10960988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.
Kim Y; Yamashita J; Shotwell JL; Chong KH; Wang HL
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An in vitro assessment of circumferential grooves on the retention of cement-retained implant-supported crowns.
Lewinstein I; Block L; Lehr Z; Ormianer Z; Matalon S
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Dec; 106(6):367-72. PubMed ID: 22133393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effects of abutment taper, length and cement type on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
Bernal G; Okamura M; Muñoz CA
J Prosthodont; 2003 Jun; 12(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 12964683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cement selection for implant-supported crowns fabricated with different luting space settings.
Gultekin P; Gultekin BA; Aydin M; Yalcin S
J Prosthodont; 2013 Feb; 22(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 23387964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of abutment height and surface roughness on in vitro retention of three luting agents.
Cano-Batalla J; Soliva-Garriga J; Campillo-Funollet M; Munoz-Viveros CA; Giner-Tarrida L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 22299076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement.
Palacios RP; Johnson GH; Phillips KM; Raigrodski AJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 16911887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retentive properties of five different luting cements on base and noble metal copings.
Ergin S; Gemalmaz D
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):491-7. PubMed ID: 12473998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Retention and leakage of implant-supported restorations luted with provisional cement: a pilot study.
Pan YH; Ramp LC; Lin CK; Liu PR
J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Mar; 34(3):206-12. PubMed ID: 17302949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Retrievability of implant-retained crowns following cementation.
Mehl C; Harder S; Wolfart M; Kern M; Wolfart S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1304-11. PubMed ID: 19040447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of uniaxial resistance forces of cements used with implant-supported crowns.
Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H; Cehreli MC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):536-42. PubMed ID: 12182296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of 3 luting agents on retention of implant-supported crowns on 2 different abutments.
Güncü MB; Cakan U; Canay S
Implant Dent; 2011 Oct; 20(5):349-53. PubMed ID: 21811170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro vertical misfit evaluation of cast frameworks for cement-retained implant-supported partial prostheses.
Oyagüe RC; Turrión AS; Toledano M; Monticelli F; Osorio R
J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 18951675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dimensional accuracy and retentive strength of a retrievable cement-retained implant-supported prosthesis.
Randi AP; Hsu AT; Verga A; Kim JJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(4):547-56. PubMed ID: 11516002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retentiveness of various luting agents used with implant-supported prosthesis: an in vitro study.
Garg P; Pujari M; Prithviraj DR; Khare S
J Oral Implantol; 2014 Dec; 40(6):649-54. PubMed ID: 25506659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Retention of zirconia copings on zirconia implant abutments cemented with provisional luting agents.
Kokubo Y; Kano T; Tsumita M; Sakurai S; Itayama A; Fukushima S
J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jan; 37(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 19849775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of fatigue damage on the force required to remove a restoration in a cement-retained implant system.
Kaar D; Oshida Y; Andres CJ; Barco MT; Platt JA
J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(5):289-94. PubMed ID: 16958729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the amount of excess cement around the margins of cement-retained dental implant restorations: the effect of the cement application method.
Chee WW; Duncan J; Afshar M; Moshaverinia A
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 23566601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Vertical discrepancy and microleakage of laser-sintered and vacuum-cast implant-supported structures luted with different cement types.
Oyagüe RC; Sánchez-Turrión A; López-Lozano JF; Suárez-García MJ
J Dent; 2012 Feb; 40(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 22108101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
