These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17931519)
1. Three-port versus standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled clinical trial in a community-based teaching hospital in eastern Nepal. Kumar M; Agrawal CS; Gupta RK JSLS; 2007; 11(3):358-62. PubMed ID: 17931519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Two-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Poon CM; Chan KW; Lee DW; Chan KC; Ko CW; Cheung HY; Lee KW Surg Endosc; 2003 Oct; 17(10):1624-7. PubMed ID: 12874694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Two-port needlescopic cholecystectomy: prospective study of 100 cases. Lee KW; Poon CM; Leung KF; Lee DW; Ko CW Hong Kong Med J; 2005 Feb; 11(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 15687513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy as a Safe and Feasible Alternative to the Conventional Four-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Chatterjee A; Kumar R; Chattoraj A Cureus; 2024 Jan; 16(1):e52196. PubMed ID: 38347985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A prospective, randomized, controlled, trial comparing occult-scar incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and classic three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Zhang L; Sah B; Ma J; Shang C; Huang Z; Chen Y Surg Endosc; 2014 Apr; 28(4):1131-5. PubMed ID: 24202712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Surgical stress response and clinical outcomes of single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prospective nonrandomized study. Han HJ; Choi SB; Kim WB; Lee JS; Boo YJ; Song TJ; Suh SO; Choi SY Am Surg; 2012 Apr; 78(4):485-91. PubMed ID: 22472410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus the classical four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized prospective clinical trial. Emre Telciler K; Ilhan E; Yakan S; Cengiz F; Senlikci A; Aktürk Hayat E Minerva Chir; 2014 Feb; 69(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 24675241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of miniport laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus standard port laparoscopic cholecystectomy on recovery of physical activity: a randomized trial. Alhashemi M; Almahroos M; Fiore JF; Kaneva P; Gutierrez JM; Neville A; Vassiliou MC; Fried GM; Feldman LS Surg Endosc; 2017 May; 31(5):2299-2309. PubMed ID: 27655375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) versus classic video-laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized prospective study. Aprea G; Coppola Bottazzi E; Guida F; Masone S; Persico G J Surg Res; 2011 Apr; 166(2):e109-12. PubMed ID: 21227454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of single-port cholecystectomy on postoperative pain. Asakuma M; Hayashi M; Komeda K; Shimizu T; Hirokawa F; Miyamoto Y; Okuda J; Tanigawa N Br J Surg; 2011 Jul; 98(7):991-5. PubMed ID: 21538340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Randomized controlled trial comparing single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ma J; Cassera MA; Spaun GO; Hammill CW; Hansen PD; Aliabadi-Wahle S Ann Surg; 2011 Jul; 254(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 21494123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Postoperative port-site pain after gall bladder retrieval from epigastric vs. umbilical port in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Siddiqui NA; Azami R; Murtaza G; Nasim S Int J Surg; 2012; 10(4):213-6. PubMed ID: 22449831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective randomized comparative study of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Lai EC; Yang GP; Tang CN; Yih PC; Chan OC; Li MK Am J Surg; 2011 Sep; 202(3):254-8. PubMed ID: 21871979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Single-port versus needlescopic versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparative study. Hosogi H; Strassel V; Martin C; Sakai Y; Saad S Asian J Endosc Surg; 2011 Aug; 4(3):120-6. PubMed ID: 22776275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cerci C; Tarhan OR; Barut I; Bülbül M Hepatogastroenterology; 2007; 54(73):15-6. PubMed ID: 17419222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Single-incision versus 3-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in symptomatic gallstones: A prospective randomized study. Omar MA; Redwan AA; Mahmoud AG Surgery; 2017 Jul; 162(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 28256257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multi-port versus single-port cholecystectomy: results of a multi-centre, randomised controlled trial (MUSIC trial). Arezzo A; Passera R; Bullano A; Mintz Y; Kedar A; Boni L; Cassinotti E; Rosati R; Fumagalli Romario U; Sorrentino M; Brizzolari M; Di Lorenzo N; Gaspari AL; Andreone D; De Stefani E; Navarra G; Lazzara S; Degiuli M; Shishin K; Khatkov I; Kazakov I; Schrittwieser R; Carus T; Corradi A; Sitzman G; Lacy A; Uranues S; Szold A; Morino M Surg Endosc; 2017 Jul; 31(7):2872-2880. PubMed ID: 27778171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laparoscopically guided transversus abdominis plane block offers better pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a triple blind randomized controlled trial. Vindal A; Sarda H; Lal P Surg Endosc; 2021 Apr; 35(4):1713-1721. PubMed ID: 32297054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Feasibility and Safety of Three-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Compared to Four-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Shah MY; Somasundaram U; Wilkinson T; Wasnik N Cureus; 2021 Nov; 13(11):e19979. PubMed ID: 34984137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]