These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17931738)

  • 1. Making policy decisions about population screening for breast cancer: the role of citizens' deliberation.
    Paul C; Nicholls R; Priest P; McGee R
    Health Policy; 2008 Mar; 85(3):314-20. PubMed ID: 17931738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How a deliberative approach includes women in the decisions of screening mammography: a citizens' jury feasibility study in Andalusia, Spain.
    Baena-Cañada JM; Luque-Ribelles V; Quílez-Cutillas A; Rosado-Varela P; Benítez-Rodríguez E; Márquez-Calderón S; Rivera-Bautista JM
    BMJ Open; 2018 May; 8(5):e019852. PubMed ID: 29730621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effectiveness of public deliberation methods for gathering input on issues in healthcare: Results from a randomized trial.
    Carman KL; Mallery C; Maurer M; Wang G; Garfinkel S; Yang M; Gilmore D; Windham A; Ginsburg M; Sofaer S; Gold M; Pathak-Sen E; Davies T; Siegel J; Mangrum R; Fernandez J; Richmond J; Fishkin J; Siu Chao A
    Soc Sci Med; 2015 May; 133():11-20. PubMed ID: 25828260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cystic fibrosis: to screen or not to screen? Involving a Citizens' jury in decisions on screening carrier.
    Mosconi P; Castellani C; Villani W; Satolli R
    Health Expect; 2015 Dec; 18(6):1956-67. PubMed ID: 25200794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Public attitudes towards novel reproductive technologies: a citizens' jury on mitochondrial donation.
    Newson AJ; de Lacey S; Dowling DK; Murray S; Sue CM; Thorburn DR; Gillam L; Degeling C
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Apr; 34(4):751-757. PubMed ID: 30865256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating the use of citizens' juries in food policy: a case study of food regulation.
    Henderson J; House E; Coveney J; Meyer S; Ankeny R; Ward P; Calnan M
    BMC Public Health; 2013 Jun; 13():596. PubMed ID: 23782688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the impact of deliberative processes on the views of participants: is it 'in one ear and out the other'?
    Stafinski T; Menon D; Yasui Y
    Health Expect; 2014 Apr; 17(2):278-90. PubMed ID: 22296492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of citizens' juries in health policy decision-making: a systematic review.
    Street J; Duszynski K; Krawczyk S; Braunack-Mayer A
    Soc Sci Med; 2014 May; 109():1-9. PubMed ID: 24657639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. From passive subject to active agent: the potential of Citizens' Juries for nursing research.
    Iredale R; Longley M
    Nurse Educ Today; 2007 Oct; 27(7):788-95. PubMed ID: 17157967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Involving a Citizens' Jury in Decisions on Individual Screening for Prostate Cancer.
    Mosconi P; Colombo C; Satolli R; Carzaniga S; ;
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0143176. PubMed ID: 26751212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Yes, the government should tax soft drinks: findings from a citizens' jury in Australia.
    Moretto N; Kendall E; Whitty J; Byrnes J; Hills AP; Gordon L; Turkstra E; Scuffham P; Comans T
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2014 Feb; 11(3):2456-71. PubMed ID: 24583829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Investigating the Extent to Which Patients Should Control Access to Patient Records for Research: A Deliberative Process Using Citizens' Juries.
    Tully MP; Bozentko K; Clement S; Hunn A; Hassan L; Norris R; Oswald M; Peek N
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 Mar; 20(3):e112. PubMed ID: 29592847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Citizens' Perspectives on Disinvestment from Publicly Funded Pathology Tests: A Deliberative Forum.
    Street JM; Callaghan P; Braunack-Mayer AJ; Hiller JE
    Value Health; 2015 Dec; 18(8):1050-6. PubMed ID: 26686790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 'Should a mammographic screening programme carry the warning: screening can damage your health!'?
    Thornton H; Baum M
    Br J Cancer; 1999 Feb; 79(5-6):691-2. PubMed ID: 10070855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Should women aged 70-74 be invited to participate in screening mammography? A report on two Australian community juries.
    Degeling C; Barratt A; Aranda S; Bell R; Doust J; Houssami N; Hersch J; Sakowsky R; Entwistle V; Carter SM
    BMJ Open; 2018 Jun; 8(6):e021174. PubMed ID: 29903796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A citizens' jury on regulation of McDonald's products and operations in Australia in response to a corporate health impact assessment.
    Anaf J; Baum F; Fisher M
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2018 Apr; 42(2):133-139. PubMed ID: 29384238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Science and deliberation].
    Ravazzi S
    Epidemiol Prev; 2008; 32(6):319-24. PubMed ID: 19353967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do consumer voices in health-care citizens' juries matter?
    Krinks R; Kendall E; Whitty JA; Scuffham PA
    Health Expect; 2016 Oct; 19(5):1015-22. PubMed ID: 26414486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Citizens' Jury and Elder Care: Public Participation and Deliberation in Long-Term Care Policy in Thailand.
    Chuengsatiansup K; Tengrang K; Posayanonda T; Sihapark S
    J Aging Soc Policy; 2019; 31(4):378-392. PubMed ID: 29452043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Enhancing citizen engagement in cancer screening through deliberative democracy.
    Rychetnik L; Carter SM; Abelson J; Thornton H; Barratt A; Entwistle VA; Mackenzie G; Salkeld G; Glasziou P
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Mar; 105(6):380-6. PubMed ID: 23378639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.