These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17931946)

  • 1. Enlarging characteristics of four nickel-titanium rotary instrument systems under standardized conditions of operator-related variables.
    Uzun O; Topuz O; Aydýn C; Alaçam T; Aslan B
    J Endod; 2007 Sep; 33(9):1117-20. PubMed ID: 17931946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Shaping ability of two rotary instruments in simulated canals: stainless steel ENDOflash and nickel-titanium HERO Shaper.
    Perez F; Schoumacher M; Peli JF
    Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):637-44. PubMed ID: 16104977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Shaping ability of ProFile and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments when used in a variable tip sequence in simulated curved root canals.
    Ayar LR; Love RM
    Int Endod J; 2004 Sep; 37(9):593-601. PubMed ID: 15317562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of shaping ability of RaCe and Hero Shaper instruments in simulated curved canals.
    Aydin C; Inan U; Yasar S; Bulucu B; Tunca YM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Mar; 105(3):e92-7. PubMed ID: 18280956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative evaluation of the preparation efficacies of HERO Shaper and Nitiflex root canal instruments in curved root canals.
    Kaptan F; Sert S; Kayahan B; Haznedaroğlu F; Tanalp J; Bayirli G
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Nov; 100(5):636-42. PubMed ID: 16243253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments and stainless steel hand K-Flexofiles in simulated curved root canals.
    Schäfer E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Aug; 92(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 11505270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effectiveness of two nickel-titanium rotary instruments and a hand file for removing gutta-percha in severely curved root canals during retreatment: an ex vivo study.
    Gergi R; Sabbagh C
    Int Endod J; 2007 Jul; 40(7):532-7. PubMed ID: 17511787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of the shaping effects of 5 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped canals.
    Ersev H; Yilmaz B; Ciftçioğlu E; Ozkarsli SF
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 May; 109(5):e86-93. PubMed ID: 20416526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shaping ability of progressive versus constant taper instruments in simulated root canals.
    Yang GB; Zhou XD; Zhang H; Wu HK
    Int Endod J; 2006 Oct; 39(10):791-9. PubMed ID: 16948665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of phase transformation on the torsional and bending properties of nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments.
    Miyai K; Ebihara A; Hayashi Y; Doi H; Suda H; Yoneyama T
    Int Endod J; 2006 Feb; 39(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 16454792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and ProTaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Paqué F; Musch U; Hülsmann M
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jan; 38(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 15606817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fracture of ProFile nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a laboratory simulation assessment.
    Di Fiore PM; Genov KI; Komaroff E; Dasanayake AP; Lin L
    Int Endod J; 2006 Jun; 39(6):502-9. PubMed ID: 16674746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mechanical behaviour of nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments in simulated clinical conditions: a computational study.
    Necchi S; Taschieri S; Petrini L; Migliavacca F
    Int Endod J; 2008 Nov; 41(11):939-49. PubMed ID: 19133083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of the shaping abilities of 4 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals.
    Yun HH; Kim SK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Feb; 95(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 12582365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of different types of automated devices on the shaping ability of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments.
    Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
    Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):627-36. PubMed ID: 16104976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cyclic fatigue of ProTaper rotary nickel-titanium instruments in artificial canals with 2 different radii of curvature.
    Inan U; Aydin C; Tunca YM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Dec; 104(6):837-40. PubMed ID: 17904394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparative study of Endoflare-Hero Shaper and Mtwo NiTi instruments in the preparation of curved root canals.
    Veltri M; Mollo A; Mantovani L; Pini P; Balleri P; Grandini S
    Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):610-6. PubMed ID: 16104974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals.
    Schäfer E; Vlassis M
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):229-38. PubMed ID: 15056349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparative computational analysis of the mechanical behavior of two nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments.
    Necchi S; Petrini L; Taschieri S; Migliavacca F
    J Endod; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1380-4. PubMed ID: 20647101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative investigation of 2 rotary nickel-titanium instruments: protaper universal versus protaper.
    Unal GC; Maden M; Savgat A; Onur Orhan E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jun; 107(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 19386519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.