These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17932184)
1. GMC clears obstetrician over claims of wrongly delaying a caesarean section. Dyer O BMJ; 2007 Oct; 335(7623):743. PubMed ID: 17932184 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of malpractice claims on the use of caesarean section. Schifrin BS; Cohen WR Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2013 Apr; 27(2):269-83. PubMed ID: 23206669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fear of litigation and cesarean section rates. Minkoff H Semin Perinatol; 2012 Oct; 36(5):390-4. PubMed ID: 23009974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Legal aspects of consent 3: the duty of care to inform. Dimond B Br J Nurs; 2001 Apr 12-25; 10(7):466-8. PubMed ID: 12070391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Doctors at India's top hospital call for new inquiry into woman's death after resident is sacked. Dutta SS BMJ; 2017 Mar; 356():j1502. PubMed ID: 28336514 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. GMC was wrong to suspend obstetrician four years after baby died. Dyer C BMJ; 2008 Nov; 337():a2612. PubMed ID: 19017718 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Obstetrician who blamed delay in a Caesarean section on a "stupid midwife" is struck off. Dyer C BMJ; 2014 Oct; 349():g6066. PubMed ID: 25294060 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. GMC imposes conditions on surgeon's registration after two babies die. Dyer C BMJ; 2010 Oct; 341():c5663. PubMed ID: 20940221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Are Drs. responsible for negligence of CRNAs? Case on point: Glassman v. Costello, 986 P.2d 1050-KS (1999). Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2000 Jan; 40(8):2. PubMed ID: 11995112 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The professional responsibility model of obstetric ethics and caesarean delivery. Chervenak FA; McCullough LB Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2013 Apr; 27(2):153-64. PubMed ID: 23059404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How lawyers have invaded the delivery room. Huber PW Med Econ; 1992 Dec; 69(23):149, 153-7, 160 passim. PubMed ID: 10122761 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Childbirth on trial. Devlin R Nurs Times; 1986 Feb 26-Mar 4; 82(9):19-20. PubMed ID: 3634385 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Choice of cesarean section and perception of legal pressure. Vimercati A; Greco P; Kardashi A; Rossi C; Loizzi V; Scioscia M; Loverro G J Perinat Med; 2000; 28(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 10875095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The obstetrical dilemma. Avery JK J Ark Med Soc; 2005 Dec; 102(6):156-7. PubMed ID: 16381401 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. $5 million jury verdict: fault apportioned 57% Dr. 43% RN. Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2000 Dec; 41(7):1. PubMed ID: 11995071 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Medical malpractice claims in obstetrics and gynaecology: comparisons between the United States and Britain. Quam L; Dingwall R; Fenn P Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1988 May; 95(5):454-61. PubMed ID: 3401431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of legal claims--informing litigation systems and quality improvement. Fox R; Yelland A; Draycott T BJOG; 2014 Jan; 121(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 24354699 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]