These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17933100)

  • 1. SEM and profilometric evaluation of enamel surface after air rotor stripping--an in vitro study.
    Mikulewicz M; Szymkowski J; Matthews-Brzozowska T
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2007; 9(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 17933100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of a desensitizing paste containing 8% arginine and calcium carbonate on the surface roughness of dental materials and human dental enamel.
    Garcia-Godoy F; Garcia-Godoy A; Garcia-Godoy C
    Am J Dent; 2009 Mar; 22 Spec No A():21A-24A. PubMed ID: 19472558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of enamel after various post-stripping polishing methods: an in vitro study.
    Gupta P; Gupta N; Patel N; Gupta R; Sandhu GS; Naik C
    Aust Orthod J; 2012 Nov; 28(2):240-4. PubMed ID: 23304974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An in vitro comparison of the effects of various air polishing powders on enamel and selected esthetic restorative materials.
    Barnes CM; Covey D; Watanabe H; Simetich B; Schulte JR; Chen H
    J Clin Dent; 2014; 25(4):76-87. PubMed ID: 26054183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vivo enamel stripping: A macroscopic and microscopic analytical study.
    Kaaouara Y; Mohind HB; Azaroual MF; Zaoui F; Bahije L; Benyahia H
    Int Orthod; 2019 Jun; 17(2):235-242. PubMed ID: 30981677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical evaluation of a new technique for interdental enamel reduction.
    Zhong M; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Zellmann M; Zellmann S; Radlanski RJ
    J Orofac Orthop; 2000; 61(6):432-9. PubMed ID: 11126018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of traditional orthodontic polishing systems with novel non-orthodontic methods for residual adhesive removal.
    Andrews J; Hagan JL; Armbruster PC; Ballard RW
    Aust Orthod J; 2016 May; 32(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 27468590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Enamel surface roughness after interproximal enamel reduction with different methods in vitro].
    Zhao BJ; Wu HM
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2011 Feb; 20(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 21451899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlations between AFM and SEM imaging of acid-etched tooth enamel.
    Vitkov L; Kastner M; Kienberger F; Hinterdorfer P; Schilcher K; Grunert I; Dumfahrt H; Krautgartner WD
    Ultrastruct Pathol; 2008; 32(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 18300031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the enamel nano-topography influenced by different techniques of interproximal reduction: An atomic force microscopic study.
    Butrus DJ; Chawshli OF
    J Orthod; 2023 Jun; 50(2):196-204. PubMed ID: 36464894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Changes in the surface microrelief and the loss of dental enamel after the use of an abrasive spray of sodium bicarbonate].
    Kuliralo M; Dourov N
    Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol Odontol; 1990 Jul; 33(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 1964618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of enamel after various stripping methods.
    Arman A; Cehreli SB; Ozel E; Arhun N; Cetinşahin A; Soyman M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Aug; 130(2):131.e7-14. PubMed ID: 16905055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Caries risk after interproximal enamel reduction.
    Jarjoura K; Gagnon G; Nieberg L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jul; 130(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 16849068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enamel surfaces following interproximal reduction with different methods.
    Danesh G; Hellak A; Lippold C; Ziebura T; Schafer E
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Nov; 77(6):1004-10. PubMed ID: 18004908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Antagonist wear of three CAD/CAM anatomic contour zirconia ceramics.
    Park JH; Park S; Lee K; Yun KD; Lim HP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jan; 111(1):20-9. PubMed ID: 24199603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of IPR by mechanical oscillating strips system on biological structures: a quantitative and qualitative evaluation.
    Gazzani F; Bellisario D; Fazi L; Balboni A; Licoccia S; Pavoni C; Cozza P; Lione R
    Prog Orthod; 2023 Mar; 24(1):9. PubMed ID: 36907908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The enamel surface quality after interproximal stripping--a scanning electron microscopic assessment of different polishing procedures].
    Hein C; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Schillai G
    Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1990 Dec; 51(6):327-35. PubMed ID: 2286346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Restitution of enamel after interdental stripping.
    Lundgren T; Milleding P; Mohlin B; Nannmark U
    Swed Dent J; 1993; 17(6):217-24. PubMed ID: 8134890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro evaluation of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) effect on stripped enamel surfaces. A SEM investigation.
    Giulio AB; Matteo Z; Serena IP; Silvia M; Luigi C
    J Dent; 2009 Mar; 37(3):228-32. PubMed ID: 19124184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The effect of different polishing methods on enamel after interproximal enamel reduction].
    Wu HM; Zhao BJ; Chen D
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2008 Feb; 17(1):96-9. PubMed ID: 18360679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.